can i take vyvanse while on accutane ciprofloxacin dose in birds make liquid clomid from powder is viagra in 25 mg effective much generic accutane insurance parcopa generic cialis how to take clomid days 2 6 how much does viagra cost at wallmart ampicillin dissolve in ethanol irah generic viagra doxycycline over the counter drug glucophage xr 750 mg pcos and metformin donde comprar propecia en colombia can you get accutane uk buying cipro line celebrities who have used accutane where to buy prednisone tablets votum plus 40mg 25 mg of zoloft price of clomid at bham womens where to buy finasteride cheap is viagra vrij verkrijgbaar in spanje sintrom 4 mg comprimidos viagra accutane safer alternatives ciprofloxacin tablets 500 mg dosage can prednisone cause diarrhea in babies can i take citalopram and viagra material safety data sheet for tadalafil generic viagra natural ciprofloxacin 250 mg erfahrungsberichte dolce doxycycline acne use axial metformin hcl 850 mg socialism with a human face real name is vibramycin tqeovertoz price prednisone and glipizide to buy cialis c800 in bangkok buy viagra in tallin much does cost accutane treatment cost clomid 25 mg dosage viagra over counter alternative in cayman islands generic name metformin hcl sildenafil citrate tablets 150 mg trazodone metformin use in breast feeding bronchitis doxycycline dosage mupirocin over the counter uk viagra generic viagra rabanxy double dosage of viagra usa viagra online reviews zoloft 50 mg how long does it take to work shelf life doxycycline tablets ciprofloxacino 500 mg para infeccion de muelas why use viagra by man propranolol 40 mg weight loss average cost of viagra 100mg shots buy tadalafil prescription pill comprare viagra in germania cheap tadalafil mg amoxil 500mg paypal how to buy viagra in johannesburg cloridrato de ciprofloxacino generico bula accutane guercmorteo price viagra sold over the counter in canada pillole viagra for sale can i take cialis 30 mg do you need a prescription for cialis in switzerland what is a over the counter herb substitute for viagra is viagra in shoppers drug mart cost of viagra with medicare can i get pregnant on first round of clomid viagra for sale online australia get viagra in dubai airport can i take probiotics while on accutane lasix 500 mg tabs tadalafil sublingual tablets can i take 2 100 mg viagra in the same day acne doxycycline 50 mg cialis online canada no prescription peptazol 40 mg effetti collaterali zoloft cialis generico senza carta di credito doxycycline dose in acne treatment propecia for sale walmart metformin buy on line male viagra safe women canada drug stores viagra viagra over counter turkey viagra canadian dollars metformin hcl 500 mg and fertility viagra sale online europe is cialis over the counter in australia will doxycycline get you high none generic prednisone 40 mg no prescription viagra where to buy melbourne citizen 150 mg viagra viagra cialis online bestellen ikea power of viagra raw types in generics for viagra can you buy viagra over counter in holland prednisone in sarcoidosis generic versus brand zoloft viagra naturel prix viagra indian names for girls lysto sildenafil lipospray buy sildenafil 20 mg best price buy nolvadex 40mg original blue herbal viagra 8000 mg erfahrungsbericht purchase inderal te 3 bailarinas donde comprar viagra can you buy viagra in panama where to but real clomid where to buy cialis tablet in delhi accutane dry skin diflucan review prednisolone orapred 15 mg5 ml solution metformin in weight loss use pegym generic viagra how to use plant viagra how to buy viagra now can i buy propecia over the counter in australia difference between generic original cialis trial pack pain specialists in tn cialis help with premature ejaculation prednisolone 50 mg preisvergleich medikamente andy cipro real estate accutane moisturizer best buy pct clomid price of generic zoloft without insurance para que sirve el prednisone de 20 mg viagra just paypal tree specialists in lebanon county viagra online kaufen pfizer prednisone dosage 20 mg x2 5 days doxycycline hyclate folliculitis nolvadex pill liquid ozontech 500 mg metformin miglior sito online per viagra 500 mg ampicillin ok for 13 year old hyoscine butyl bromide 20 mg prednisone use of 50 mg prednisone for one day how long does viagra take 2 work viagra history canada prednisone 50 mg prior to ct scan doxycycline powder where to buy monodox doxycycline reviews 100mg clomid trying to conceive 20 days of 50 mg clomid with mens hypertension and use of viagra viagra capsule in pakistan sick viagra order online canada superdrug online viagra generic cialis no prescription mastercard metformin rowcmoadreders for sale where can i buy viagra immediately allergic reaction to amoxil viagra for men in south africa for sale sildenafil tablets mygra 100 is it safe doxycycline zonnebank can a man take viagra twice in a day how to buy ampicillin 50 mg doxycycline for chlamydia nolvadex bodybuilding results in 12 how long to take clomid before iui is there viagra for sale at gnc zithromax 250 mg effets secondaires viagra gives mutiple erection in four hours do online cialis work any harm in taking 40 mg cialis clomid private prescription ebay medicine zithromax oral suspensio by paypal can you buy doxycycline in vietnam crime in socialist democratic society viagra para mujeres natural drusolol generico do viagra buying cialis from canada reputable pipamperon 40 mg bijsluiter nolvadex cuantas dosis de cytotec debo usar si tengo 19 semanas indiana viagra how 2 take clomid market value it specialist salary what do i tell my doctor to get viagra safe take viagra propecia does generic sildenafil work for women lasix drip in acute renal failure lasix 40 mg in turkey buy tadalafil online no prescription taper off zoloft safely natural vegetable viagra viagra for prostate cancer fdamedstore com buy online 525 clomid better erections with liquid viagra acheter zithromax paypal can i take viagra with ramipril differenze tra viagra generico e originale viagra safe to use everyday best moisturizer for accutane patients india viagra generic cipla sildenafil citrate 50mg online auctions safe take 150 mg viagra images sildenafil citrate powder price in pakistan viagra in canada for sale buy cialis cheap in south africa zithromax liquid concentration conversion carry viagra in luggage cytotec medicine price in pakistan iphone buy cialis east grinstead what color in viagra tablets for women in india review accutane come comprare il viagra in contrassegno viagra store in faridabad equine doxycycline treatment what to take after clomid fails tool 20 tadalafil in india anagen viagra generico hair full regrow with 1.25 mg finasteride does cialis cause dependence where can i fined viagra in sa is viagra a prescription drug in dubai over the counter viagra substitute gncu dapoxetine approved canada prednisone 20 mg asma lovenox in pregnancy dosing of cipro accutane and mood disorders esencia de fresa donde comprar viagra what mg clomid fast acting viagra alternative online 50webs com order site viagra how much time to take viagra how long will i stay hard for a 20 mg cialis propecia long term does cialis cause hiccups buy lasix injections buy viagra online 5 pills donde comprar cytotec en california indian ayurvedic equivalent of viagra doxycycline dosage in sinusitis best place to buy zithromax without prescription viagra in berlin kaufen medicamento rosuvas 10 mg prednisone cada cuanto se debe tomar ciprofloxacina 500 mg how to dose liquid nolvadex are viagra illegal in usa why is prednisone used in asthma how hard is it to get an accutane prescription is it safe to take benadryl and prednisone together amoxil bestellen paypal paypal bezahlen cialis tadalafil material safety data sheet free sample viagra canada ciprofloxacin and delirium in elderly 100mg of doxycycline twice daily canada zoloft hiderax 25 mg zoloft viagra buy alternative where to buy metformin no prescription can you get cialis in ireland bula medicamento suvvia 50 mg zoloft propecia or finasteride generico finasteride tabletas 1 mg using accutane in the summer can we use viagra in islam buy viagra puerto carmen prednisone buy in eu cialis 20 mg efectos secundarios kann ich viagra frei kaufen can i buy lasix cialis 2.5 bestellen cyriax 500 mg ciprofloxacin 500mg antibiotics brands of doxycycline in india is taking viagra safe cialis in pak metformin in heart failure guidelines diflucan tablete 50 mg.pret cytotec for sale in malaysia honda dapoxetine 30 mg tablet price in india onde comprar o remedio priligy no brasil cheap dapoxetine baownbeuv new zealand socialist ideals viagra generico en chile camioneta torsemide 20 mg lasix cheap viagra austin bisacodyl 5 mg delayed release metformin how metformin works cheap viagra search over counter viagra nz buy zithromax use derma smoothe scalp oil generic viagra how long to take effect cialis 20 mg accutane results and reviews what does viagra do to men super bock for sale in uk zithromax buy cialis online paypal payment ciproxin indications in urdu viagra in lahore pakistan phone number sildenafil generico farmacias similares chihuahua viagra treat premature ejaculation prednisone 50 mg for 5 days price cipro back order information cialis 20 mg viagra 50mg price australia if you masterbate then take a viagra will you get hard finasteride pausa nolvadex pct dosage epistane buy buy cialis soft tabs 60 pills viagra needs prescription in uae finasteride and hair loss in women cialis express shipping paypal clomid taken late in cycle is doxycycline a penicillin 5 mg prednisolone cheap generic propecia for sale where to purchase viagra over the counter boots pfizer viagra pufchese online in india prednisone 10 mg dosepak directions buy viagra online from tescos can doxycycline be used to treat trichomonas cialis generico super active 20mg methadone where to buy viagra in baku azerbaijan does prednisone build up in the body multiple rates with clomid reviews fentanyl viagra brand name 100 mg gibraltar buy viagra mood disorders doxycycline hyclate do have have prescription buy viagra masterbating on viagra pfizer viagra 100mg test does sildenafil help with premature ejaculation prednisone vs medrol reputable place buy viagra is brand name klonopin better than generic cialis watermelon liquid viagra dosage online apotheke deutschland cialis information zoloft knee pain priligy dapoxetine online buy diflucan 200 mg ev nepresol 25 mg dosierung ciprofloxacin average pharmacy price for viagra cytotec causas y consecuencias tadalafil generic australia what happens cialis 2 days in a row viagra v8 reviews real propecia online legal order viagra over internet does viagra increase your blood pressure follicle size in natural ovulation after clomid cheapest viagra 50 mg paypal where do we viagra chocolate in bangalore prednisone dosage pediatric ciprofloxacin brand name in lebanon order cialis online pakistan cuantas cytotec debo usar con 7 semanas de embarazo doxycycline 100mg twice daily for 14 days canada viagra 50 mg austalia online viagra should i take 50 or 100mg viagra over the counter products with tadalafil indian viagra tablets names of angels cytotec vs pitocin in labor induction procedure nolvadex liquid form for sale no prescription nolvadex d 20 mg bijwerkingen cialis ketoconazole vs diflucan safer much does real viagra cost buy viagra pill com cialis black gold 600 mg clip 500 mg metformin cialis in kombination mit viagra glucophage price uk rare is generic viagra works elafax 75 mg zoloft cialis mg 20 viagra private sales in canada viagra before and after rash after stopping prednisone tadalafil 20 mg tab can eating viagra once help in performance anxiety atp 50 mg viagra propecia brand ciprofloxacin online diflucan effets secondaires best reciprocating cordless lithium saw viagra india quora how to take cialis 10 mg inderal 10 mg wikipedia dictionary doxycycline cost asda online what should you do if you take 200 mg of viagra does clomid cause irregular cycles metformin pcos weight loss reviews can viagra be taken with plavix safe young man take viagra does generic ciprofloxacin look like que costo tiene una pastilla de viagra success rate 150 mg clomid cost of 100 mg viagra vs. 20 mg cialis abitatia viagra online can i buy clomid over the counter in kenya ampicillin sulbactam brand viagra grapefruit effects socialist party in the usa preco equilid 50 mg viagra can accutane cause yellow teeth viagra usa original how long is viagra really good for price of cialis at walmart at siler city n c weight gainer best time take zoloft buy cialis daily in hong kong doxycycline 20 mg dental prednisone 10 mg for asthma cough clomid weight loss generic medicine tablets metformin et inderal 80 mg retard strength generika dapoxetine india online apotheke viagra generikum flemaliz 500 mg metformin how much does cialis cost in bc anyone get pregnant on 3rd cycle of clomid can i take panadol with accutane doxycycline acne treatment duration is 1000 mg metformin too much black market viagra cheap doxycycline cost asda direct are there any over the counter viagra viagra across border in usa c cialis n i take 4 5 mg cialis instead of 20 mg how long before sex should i take viagra pill cialis viagra new york city over the counter accutane review for miles to medium acne can i take viagra with high blood pressure tablets how long does viagra last after you take it viagra legal in hungary buy generic viagra in canada comprar finasteride alemania safest generic viagra percent of multiple births with clomid reviews metformin canadian price buy generic propecia online asia clorhidrato de propranolol 40 mg para que sirve what is ciprofibrate canonical brand name viagra order malaysia zoloft sales generic tadalafil 32 costco pharmacy viagra vs other pharmacy finasteride or propecia accutane cause rashes do you take zoloft in the am or pm walmart price cialis for daily use nike fs lite run 3 womens reviews on viagra how much does generic viagra cost comprar linimento naion and viagra can i buy viagra from usa into uk france can i get viagra over the counter how can i buy clomid cytotec price mercury drug canadian clomid prednisolone tabletten kaufen haus clomid en mexico viagra online kaufen billig cheap mexican order viagra buy cialis from idia propecia propak 1 mg 90 ct liquid doxycycline rats sildenafil zentiva 100 mg filmtabletten wikipedia viagra discounted prices walgreens buy viagra cost buying metformin in mexico accutane for menopause acne viagra pfizer usa meds 24 online viagra sales does real cialis look like i whant to buy clomid 150mg acyclovir zovirax ointment to buy buy viagra in the us effets secondaires cialis 20mg sildenafil citrate tablets 130 mg to grams doxycycline malaria buy rosario tibetano donde comprar viagra sildenafil molecular weight human doxycycline dose clomid pct use annual sales of cialis which cycle days to take clomid buy cytotec for miscarriage generika cialis erfahrungen fabian essays in socialism most popular title does viagra cause heart attacks where i will viagra in blore how buy viagra from japan zithromax in der stillzeit brolylegs cross counter viagra escitalopram 5mg to 10 mg prednisone comprar cialis generico farmacias can you cross sildenafil from mexico to usa losartan 100 mg y viagra safe get pregnant viagra medical stores selling female viagra in mumbai doxycycline dosage mgd zovirax 800 mg posologie paracetamol when is the best time for take prednisone 50 mg can i take viagra with naproxen diclofenac 150 mg dosierung ciprofloxacin merck propecia in mexico ciproxin 500 mg prostatite zithromax 500 mg und alkoholismus propecia help creatine reviews Kiwipolitico » Toleration
Archive for ‘Toleration’ Category
Browse:
Toleration »
Subcategories:

Darkness at heart.

datePosted on 17:22, January 5th, 2017 by Pablo

Lets consider a hypothetical scenario.

A group of women appear to be well on their way to intoxication at a polite venue on an island known to cater to the affluent. They are not caucasian. A well-heeled older white male patron observes them and decides, perhaps after a few tipples of his own, to take it upon himself to caution them about the perils of drinking and driving in an area that has a heavy police presence over the holidays. He assumes that they are not locals.

His unsolicited advice is not welcome and he is told by one of the women, a 23 year old, that as local born and indigenous to boot, she “can do what she pleases” (according to his account).

His response, according to her, is to say that she needs to acknowledge that it “is also a white people’s island.” He says that it was just joking banter.

My questions at this point are this: even if she was being drunk and dismissive, of all the things he could have said, why that particular line? Could he not have replied in a myriad other ways, such as by telling her that her behaviour was drawing unwanted attention? Was he trying to say that the rule of law applies to everyone regardless of origin, but that the law is made by white folk? Even more to the point, why did he feel the need to go over and caution them? Is he in the habit of approaching strange women in public venues and giving them the benefit of his unsolicited advice? If so, why?

In any event, in the real world the young woman hits social media with her displeasure and the incident becomes a media frenzy. Various celebrities weigh in to defend the old guy, leaning on his good deeds for sport and various charitable contributions. Others are not so charitable.

The scenario gets stickier because he uses as a PR spokesperson a well-known reactionary woman who, in response to the furore over this remarks, at first says that the 23 year old is too fair skinned to have been the subject of racism and then says that she has never heard of the term “casual racism” until today.

The Race Relations Commissioner, herself of disputed background when it comes to issues of racial awareness, at first says that the old white gent is not a racist but then backtracks and introduces the term casual racism that the PR spokeswoman had previously never heard of. The term is certainly not new but it seems that the PR woman travels in insulated circles.

The questions that arise at this point are: seriously, the old white guy uses an even more clueless old white woman with a rightwing track record to defend him against charges of “casual” racism? And she then decides to use the 23 year old’s skin tone as a defense against the charge of racism (because the young woman is light skinned)? And in 2017 she claims to not know what “casual” racism is (perhaps because she casually is one)?

As for the Race Relations Commissioner–was she conflating her personal and official views when she made either or both of her statements?

Anyway, like I said, this is just a hypothetical scenario about race, gender and generational difference referencing current events in a post-truth age.

in a weird way, it reminds me of another (not so) old guy getting into some strife because of his penchant for serial hair-pulling of (sometimes very) young women in public venues or at events. He too claimed that his actions were just playful, joking physical banter that was misconstrued by one recipient of his attentions (and to be fair, none of his other instances of hair pulling were even noted, much less protested until a waitress complained). According to his many defenders, he was not a sexist or a fetishistic creep.

I guess offence is taken in the eye of the beholder, but in both cases the offence was taken after an older white male in a position of power decided to unilaterally approach and engage younger women in ways that were unwanted. In each case the older male felt entitled, or privileged, to initiate contact with a younger woman without first ascertaining whether that contact was welcome, and continued the contact after it became apparent that it was not. That others defended their actions as, at worst “misunderstandings,” speaks to a number of things.

What could they be and why, in 2017, should they be?

Social origins of the Politically Absurd.

datePosted on 09:35, November 8th, 2016 by Pablo

The 2016 US presidential election is a an existential crisis of American society politically manifest as a theatre of the absurd. The story line revolves around a clash of visions over what constitutes the preferred America. On one side is what could be called the “old” vision. The vision is “old” not only because it harks to so-called traditional values rooted in nostalgic reimagining of the 1950s, but because those who most ardently adhere to it are lower educated whites aged 45 and over who are or were employed in blue collar, service sector and small business occupations.

This vision privileges the dominance of white heterosexual christian male values. It is both laissez faire and  economically nationalist in orientation, patriarchal and socially insular in perspective, wary of “outsiders,” and believes in a natural order where rules are made to be obeyed without question. It prizes conformity and stability and respect for authority.

On the other side is a “new” vision. This vision is “new” because it is multiracial, multicultural, heteroreligious and secular, plurisexual, post-feminist, economically internationalist, global in orientation and polyarchical when it comes to power distribution, legitimate authority and social hierarchy.

In reality the two visions bleed into each other in specific instances to form a hybrid social orientation in many groups that is not as dichotomous or binary as it otherwise might be. I say “bleed” rather than “blend” into each other because the overlap and cross-fertilisation between the two social perspectives is not uniform or universally applied: Mexican American IT specialists may enjoy rap as much as Norteno music while dutifully practicing their Catholic faith and adhering to its moral codes, while middle aged white professionals  can find identity in the mores and practices of non-traditional cultures and religions while engaging in post-modern leisure pursuits.

The battle between the old and new perspectives began in the 2008 presidential election when a representative of the “new” vision, Barak Obama, took on an old white man, John McCain, for the highest office in the land. That continued in 2012 when Obama confronted another old white man, Mitt Romney, in his re-election bid. It continues today in the form of another “new” candidate, Hillary Clinton, facing yet another old white man, Donald Trump. Clinton may not be the archetypical “new” candidate as described above, but the mere fact that she is female is a break from the traditional mould.

For his part, Trump represents a grotesque caricature of the traditional alpha male, and in the absurdity of his candidacy lies the last gasps of a dying culture. In his sociopathic narcissism, his sexually predatory behaviour, his racism, bigotry and xenophobia, his abject greed, his pathological lying, his thin-skinned obsession with revenge, his insensitivity to others, his ignorance of basic economic, political, military and diplomatic facts, and in his adolescent resort to crude insults and derision as a weapon of last resort, Trump is the antithesis of the self-made, strong and independent straight-talking man on horseback. And yet, because he acts as if he were and the GOP and conservative media enabled his deception, those who embrace the “old” vision see in him a saviour. But they are wrong, for what he is to them and the culture that they cling to is an angel of death.

That culture is dying because over 45 year old lower educated whites have the highest rates of suicide, alcoholism and opiod addiction in the US, so they are quite literally leaving the mortal coil at higher rates than everyone else. That is not a demographic on which to base a presidential campaign and yet Trump and the GOP have dog whistled, incited, pandered and courted it as these people will live forever or at least until the mythical past can become the future once again.

The “old” vision will lose this election but it will not be its death rattle. Its adherents will fight against the king tide of social change with  the fervour of a drowning man, and some of them will become violent. The obstructionists in the GOP will do everything in their power to undermine the Clinton presidency, and they will front another “old” visionary in the 2020 presidential campaign. But regardless of what they do and how much they resist, the hard fact is that demographic, socio-economic and cultural change are irresistible forces that work against them.

They are doomed and within a generation they will be gone.

Note: I write this the day before the election simply to give my brief read on the broader context that explains why Clinton will win. Depending on how poorly the GOP does in the House and Senate races, the bloodletting within the Republican camp could be epic. That will be fun to watch.

Such a nice crowd.

datePosted on 12:20, September 13th, 2016 by Pablo

Unfortunately I know people, to include some in my own family, who are Trump supporters and who think that Fox News is “fair and balanced.” I also know some people, including one here at KP, who think that voting for Trump is all good because it will break the status quo politics represented by Hillary Clinton.

Many of the people I know that have chosen the Trump/Fox News view of the world bristle at the suggestion that they have issues with race/ethnicity/gender/Islam/sexuality/foreigners/poor people/disabled people/whatever. Some of those who think that voting for Trump is an anarchic stroke of tactical genius appear to ignore the concerns raised by these suggestions or believe them to be untrue. Allow me the right of rejoinder with one link.

It may not be a statistically significant sample of opinion among the Trump/Fox News “nation,” but I believe that this compilation is emblematic of what lies at its core. And if this is the base sentiment behind Trump that is being championed by Fox News, then the situation, if not the very character of his campaign, is indeed a giant basket of deplorable.

Say what you want about Ms. Clinton (and I shall write something about the false narrative about her at some point), she does not attract this type of folk. In fact, she repels them, which is as good enough reason to vote for her as is anything else.

The Language of Violence

datePosted on 10:37, July 18th, 2016 by E.A.

There was an attempted coup in Turkey on the weekend. So far there are no real details on why and militaries can end up intervening in politics for a variety of reasons. Jets were scrambled, an attack helicopter was shot down and people massed in the streets and suddenly as it started it was over.

What is known is that while Erdogan is back in power I don’t think this is really a victory for democracy as he has become increasingly authoritarian over time and been connected to more than one scandal while in government.

Already the media has been talking about “purges” of both bad military personnel and anyone else who happens to oppose him so don’t expect the underlying issues which sparked the coup to go away anytime soon.

Add to this an ongoing bombing campaign in Turkey, often directed at military personnel and the “fun fun fun” next door in Syria and it’s not too difficult to see what may have been going through the minds of the plotters when they decided to have a coup.

The death toll from all of this is around 300 and it appears that those in the coup maker’s side decided to fire on civilians at least once, which while not the turning point, would not have been a recommended means to gather support when overthrowing a government.

Meanwhile in the US more police officers are dead in what is starting to appear to be tit for tat style killings in response to police killing various black American males.

While tragic I can’t help but feel somewhat concerned that in a nation full of guns and racial tensions (among other things) this is not going to be the last time this happens. An example has been set and if the police continue to use guns as a means to enforce the law then expect others to do so as well in response to issues of police behaving lawlessly.

And while somewhat peripheral to the situation, killings those tasked to enforce the law is a text book indicator of a brewing insurgency. Usually these acts happen to not only send a message and destabilize the current authority (allowing the insurgent to substitute its own authority) but to also acquire weapons to which further the struggle but in gun crazy USA there is no need to worry about getting your hands on high power weaponry (thanks NRA!) so consider this just a message sent.

Politicians and pundits wring their hands, the president says something reassuring but I can’t see any political means for the US to step away from this. The US looks more and more like an apartheid state every day and nothing I hear from friends and family living there gives me any indication that the horrible momentum of a dying super power will be arrested before the inevitable fall happens (for those who would like to get an indicator of how this goes I strongly recomend Gibbons Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire as a text book read for how Empires fail).

And over in Asia the sabers are being rattled after the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) decided to enforce the UNCLOS (United Nations Law of the Sea) against Chinese actions in the South China Sea, deeming them illegal.

Will that actually stop China from building islands and military bases on coral reefs and atolls and behaving belligerently? Probably not as the immediate response out of Beijing was to declare it “rigged” in favor of the West which I would normally consider an appropriate response from China but in this instance just smacks of sour grapes.

In fact I expect immediate action form China in the wake of this as its already verbally blasted Australia for commenting unfavorably on this and I wonder if our current trade spat with China might be related to our not kowtowing to China on this issue.

What is clear that this one has been slow brewing for the past half-decade and even longer once you get into the history of it (one of my specialist areas of Masters study) and with natural resources like fishing, possible oil, and territorial sovereignty on the line among China, Taiwan, The Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia and Japan (as something similar is brewing between Japan and China over disputed islands between them) no body is likely to be able, or willing to back down.

Add to this increased naval and related weapons sales to all parties and the US firmly opposed to China on this issue and you have all the makings of a cold war style thriller (which, if I remember correctly, was actually predicted by some Cold War style Tom Clancy type novelist in the 1980’s, whose names escapes me at this time).

And finally in NZ we have two individuals shot dead by the Police in one week. Both may have been in self-defense and both may have been justified (as details, while sketchy, seem to indicate that it was a means of last resort or in the face of imminent threat) but again the message is clear and unlike the US not (at least yet) a common occurrence in our society.

There is no common thread among these events except one which is, as the song* says, that “death is the silence” in the language of violence.

*-The Language of Violence by The Disposable Heroes of Hiphoprisy

 

 

 

Go The Donald!

datePosted on 15:25, September 1st, 2015 by Pablo

I am lucky to be able to vote in the US as well as NZ, and very much relish the opportunity in both countries. In the US I am registered as a voter in Florida, which is a closed primary state. “Closed” primary states are those in which a voter has to declare a party preference prior to the primaries in order to vote in them. For years before and after I established a residence in Florida I listed my political affiliation as “Independent,” something that allowed me to choose a primary to vote in the “open” primary states where voting preferences did not have to be declared prior to primary season (they only have to be declared and ticked off on the day at the balloting station). In 2008 I decided to switch my declared affiliation to Democrat so that I could vote in the Florida Democratic Party primary given that not only were Obama and Hillary running for president, but there were races for the US House, Senate and local seats that needed to see Republicans defeated.

This year I am going to switch affiliation to Republican. Why? Because that way I can vote for Donald Trump in the Republican primary in the hope that he makes it to the GOP National Convention next July. It has been a very long time since either major party has had a brokered convention where several candidates are in the running for the presidential nomination, and should The Donald survive until then the craziness will be well and truly on. Since he is totally unqualified to be dog catcher much less president and unelectable in the general election, it is my sincere hope that he hangs in all the way to the convention and either becomes the GOP candidate, determines who is, or runs a third party candidacy after losing out in the convention to one of the others. The only thing better would be for Kanye to join that gaggle of fools and trolls but, alas, he is going to wait until 2020 to run.

Already The Donald has become to the GOP what Miley Cyrus is to pop muzak: a wrecking ball. The Republican National Committee must be choking on their Cohibas (illegal until the recent diplomatic reopening with Cuba) and dying a slow death every time he speaks or when they read the polls. Because let us be clear: Trump appeals to the stupidest, xenophobic, economically illiterate, racist, bigoted, misogynist, white cultural supremacist elements in US society. He follows in a long line of populist demagogues that extends back through Ross Perot to Pat Buchanan, George Wallace and Huey Long.  He may purport to speak unvarnished truth but in fact what he says is most often non-sensical rubbish that fails to address reality much less the intricacies of democratic governance with a division of powers: he is going to “do the deal” with whomever; most Mexicans are rapists and drug dealers; he will “build a wall and make Mexico pay for it” (along 1,900 miles of topographically challenging terrain that includes numerous sensitive ecological zones and wildlife corridors); he will deport “illegals ” and their “anchor babies,”  (all 14 million of them); he will simultaneously confront China, Iran and Russia; he will make the US military “great” again so that no one will “mess” with it (forgetting that the US spends more on defense than the next seven countries combined–US$610 billion or 20 percent of US federal spending and 3.7 percent of GDP–and still has people “messing” with it); he will provide better women’s health care in spite of gutting Planned Parenthood and removing health care for “alien” women because he “cherishes” women in general (ignoring the fact that two of his wives were not citizens when he married them). Everyone in politics but him are incompetent or idiots. His speeches are endless repeats of these and other inane mantras interspersed with self-congratulatory self-praise and personal insults directed at his rivals, all other politicians and anyone who disagrees with him.

The truth is that he has no plan, has no policy agenda, has no friggin’ clue what it is like to deal with the complex issues that confront the US. And that is why the rednecks and dimwits like him. He makes the hard seem easy.

What is great about this is that he is forcing the other GOP candidates to respond to him, and they have stepped up to the plate in predictable style. Among other gems, Ben Carson (the neurosurgeon) says homosexuality is a choice because men go to prison straight and come out gay; Scott Walker just suggested that building a 3,987 mile wall on the Canadian border is worth looking into; Jeb Bush wants to abolish Planned Parenthood and believes that the invasion of Iraq “turned out well;” Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio want walls and deportations even though they are children of recent immigrants who were legally documented after, not before their arrivals. They all claim that the US military and its veterans have been crippled by Obama even though it was Bush 43 who ordered them into two simultaneous wars while cutting back veterans benefits as well as the budget for post-combat trauma rehabilitation. They all claim that ISIS is an Obama invention even though it was Dubya’s purge of Saddam’s army that provided the leadership material for what became ISIS’s fighting forces. They all oppose gun control and climate change science and all support hacking, fracking, drilling and spilling regardless of environmental consequence. They all oppose abortion and gay marriage even if some of their past records indicate otherwise. The list of idiocy goes on but should not surprising given that Rick Perry, Rich Santorum, Mike Huckabee and several snivelling weasels remain in contention.

As things stand now, the GOP primary is a circus. There may not be any juggling or animal acts, but there sure are a lot of clowns, and The Donald is the ringmaster. Even if the number of viable candidates drops to 2 or 3 by the time of the GOP convention, it will be Trump who sets the Right’s narrative for the general election. Yippee!

It looks like the US media has decided to sit back and watch the circus unfold. Fox News tried to undermine him in the first debate that it aired, but his nasty personal attacks on the female panelist only strengthened his support among the troglodyte crowd and has forced Fox to backtrack and give him coverage as the Party favourite. All other outlets are content to watch the train wreck proceed while offering the mediocre tedium that passes for informed analysis by the usual spectrum of pundits. As a result, the GOP favourite, Jeb Bush (or “Mr. Low Energy,” as The Donald calls him) has seen his coverage slip to the sidelines along with the other yokels. Likewise, for all of the Fox News chest beating, Hillary Clinton is getting a general pass by the press because her sins are run of the mill when it comes to DC politics and her campaign is about practicable policy, not theatrics.

The key to the outcome will be seen in January when the first GOP primaries are held. If The Donald does well in them he will be hard to stop. So the RNC has to find a way to do him in either before then or to go all out nuclear on him should he prevail in Iowa or New Hampshire. That is when the questions about his draft dodging, drug use, association with organised crime, commercial racism, trust fund baby status, adultery, academic record embellishment and a host of other peccadilloes and not-so-small sins will find their way into the mainstream media. But even then he may be too big a juggernaut to derail in time for the GOP to coalesce around another candidate who may stand a chance in the general election.

I cannot begin to express how delighted I am to watch this unfold. The Donald may well force the GOP to split into two, with the Tea Baggers on one side and the corporate sponsors on the other.

Either way, he is single-handedly killing the US Right as a unified political force.

For that I have one thing to say: Go The Donald!

Guest Post by Kate: Human Rights are Universal.

datePosted on 08:42, May 8th, 2015 by Pablo

On returning this week from his trade mission in the Middle East, John Key stated on Breakfast TV that countries such as Saudi Arabia have views of human rights that are “different” from our own, justifying the government’s decision to exclude human rights issues from any trade agreement that New Zealand is able to secure in the region. That is putting it rather mildly. Saudi Arabia has one of the consistently worst human records in the world. While the mainstream media is quick to focus in on a discriminatory gender regime that bans women from driving and requires them to be covered from head-to-toe, such problems pale in comparison to the treatment of the foreign workers who make up at least a third of the country’s population, or the torture, imprisonment, and death sentences handed down to Christian converts, human rights workers, activists, journalists, and other critics of the ruling elite. Unlike the distinctly Saudi approach to gender relations, it is difficult to see how the Saudis themselves could seriously attempt to justify such severe human rights abuses in religious or cultural terms.

What is especially surprising about the Prime Minister’s statement is that, if he genuinely believes that Saudi Arabian understandings of human rights are “different” rather than simply wrong, this would put him far over on the fringes of moral philosophy into the cultural relativist camp. This is a space occupied only by academic extremists who have followed the logics of social constructionism to their absolute and final conclusions (i.e. there is no such thing as truth, which makes it rather hard to speak truth to power as many of these theorists seem to want to do), or a small minority on the extreme right, which proposes that liberal values can only ever be achieved in supposedly superior Western cultures. Sticking to this line of argument means that anything whatsoever can be justified in cultural terms to the point where, essentially, nothing practised by any society at any point in history can be criticised at all. What strange company for a Mr. Moderate who usually tries to avoid coming to any conclusions that could undermine his apparently undying popularity to be found in.

Furthermore, this is not the generally shared understanding most reasonable people have of these issues. In fact, New Zealand, along with just about every other country in the world, is a signatory to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted in the wake of the horrors of World War Two and aimed at establishing a basic set of rights and liberties that countries should do their very best to uphold. Least it isn’t clear from the title of the Declaration, most of the world believes that human rights are universal, Mr. Key, not particular.

Saudi Arabia, by the way, does not accept these principles, rejecting the Declaration on the grounds that guaranteeing freedom of religion would be detrimental to the country’s own traditions, and that its own version of Islamic law supposedly upholds a higher threshold of human rights than this or any other international agreement. By far the more important point, however, is that New Zealand is itself a signatory to the Universal Declaration, which not only obligates us to ensuring that we uphold basic human rights within our own borders, but also to promote human rights abroad.

Yet when it comes to trade agreements, the explicit approach adopted by both recent centre-right and centre-left governments has been to exclude human rights from the negotiating agenda. This puts us at odds with the other members of the international “club” we belong to, to use another of the Prime Minister’s terms. Based on academic research, the World Trade Organization states that about 75 percent of contemporary trade agreements include human rights clauses, whether binding or non-binding, driven largely by the human rights promotion agenda of Canada, the European Union, and yes, the United States. It obviously cannot be assumed that these clauses always lead to substantive improvements in human rights outcomes, but they are a start.

The real reason behind both National and Labour’s exclusion of human rights concerns from the negotiation of trade deals is two-fold. Firstly, to state the obvious, New Zealand is very small in global terms, and thus cannot exercise much leverage over larger countries in the Asia and the Middle East. When countries are dependent on us for aid, absolutely do we try to influence human rights, most notably in the Pacific (which also occasionally invokes issues of culture and human rights that I don’t intend to get into here). Realistically, if we are to incorporate human rights concerns into our trade relations framework, this might more successful if done through multilateral arrangements—yet is it difficult to see human rights becoming a major concern of the kind of multilateral trade deals that New Zealand has wedded itself to, such as the Trans Pacific Partnership.

Secondly, the bipartisan approach reveals not only a deep ideological commitment to free trade that is not necessarily shared by other developed countries, in which the influence of large protectionist interest groups often moderates that stance, but a rather naïve belief that trade deals and trade relationships can be separated from everything else. Despite good empirical and historical evidence that trade cannot be viewed independently from other aspects of foreign policy, we do this with regard to our security relations, in which government officials cannot see the long-term problem emerging out of the contradiction between an Asia-oriented trade policy and a Five Eyes-oriented security one, and we also apparently do it when it comes to more noble causes.

So herein lies the hypocrisy not only of our current leadership, but all those sectors of our community who stress trade above all other national goals. We tend to have a rather rosy view of our country not only as an independent voice in the international arena, but as a progressive force in the big wide world. We ban nuclear ships and we save whales. We were the first to give women the vote and at least some of protested against the Springbok Tour. We think we deserve a seat on the Security Council because we are nice (alternatively, to carry on the theme, there are those who no doubt think it will help us out on the trade front). Not caring—or pretending not to care— about the worst instances of human rights abuses, however, not only threatens to undermine this aspect of our national identity, but undermines both our reputation and potential as a global player that punches above our weight on moral issues.

Left in tatters.

datePosted on 12:14, September 21st, 2014 by Pablo

A while back I wrote a post arguing that the NZ Left was in serious disarray. Various Left pontificators fulminated from the depths of their revolutionary armchairs against my views, denouncing me for being defeatist. I responded as politely as I could.

Last night conservative, ring wing parties won nearly 64 percent of the popular vote. Left wing parties–such as they are given Labour’s pro-capitalist bent, the Green’s turn to the middle and Internet/Mana’s schizophrenic leanings–mustered 36 percent of the vote. The message is clear: New Zealand is a right-leaning country. Nearly 30 years of pro-market policy (an entire generation’s worth) has resulted in a country that no longer considers egalitarian and redistributive principles as hallmarks of the national identity. Instead, the turn to self-interest has seeped deeply into the social fabric.

That is the context in which the NZ Left must operate. That is the context that I was writing about in my earlier postings. And that is the context that we will have for the foreseeable future unless the Left learns to shift the terms of the political debate off of tax cuts, deficits, public spending, workforce flexibility and other pro-market arguments. So far it has not done so and in fact has often tried to operate within the context and political debate as given. Perhaps last night’s drubbing will make the Left realise that this is a mistake.

After all, those who define the terms of the debate are those who win.

In order for the Left to re-define the terms of political debate in NZ there has to be a plausible counter-argument that can compete with the language of austerity, limited government, non-interference and self-interested maximising of opportunities. This election campaign demonstrated that concerns about civil liberties, privacy, child poverty, environmental degradation, corporate welfare, predatory trade and other progressive cornerstones took a back seat to economic stability as defined by market ideologues.

Given that fact, the process of re-definition has to start there: basic definition of economic stability. One way to do so if to move off of the usual market analytics favoured by bankers and corporates and onto the social costs of an increasingly unequal division of labour. Because the price for market stability is seen in a host of variables that are not amenable to standard market analysis, yet which are as real as the glue sniffing starved kid living rough and begging for change on the increasingly mean streets of Godzone.

Barking from the closet.

datePosted on 10:35, February 22nd, 2014 by Pablo

If one thing has proven true over the years when it comes to religion and politics, it is that those who most ardently decry homosexuality as abnormal and represent themselves as paragons of “christian” family values often are themselves seriously repressed when it comes to their own sexual preferences. Be they Tories in the UK, Republicans in the US and preachers, priests, mullahs and rabbis the world over, these closet hypocrites go to great lengths to hide their “baser” urges, to include engaging in contact (!) sports and other “manly” activities like game hunting, entering into heterosexual marriages, having children, advocating for corporal punishment and loudly and obsessively condemning “deviant” sexual behavior and the gay community and feminists for a myriad of sins against the “natural” order of things.

Their self-loathing is such that some even practice how they walk and talk so as to appear more Roman than Greek (I am using the terms loosely here, as both Romans and Greeks accepted the “baser” urges as a part of life and are differentiated more by the class, gender and age element in them). Some go to great lengths to dress and act acceptably “mainstream” (according to how they perceive the mainstream). The more strident of the closet prudes threaten and bully those who question their public stance as well as their private desires.

Given its egalitarian and tolerant reputation, it would be a real shame if such people were a significant part of the New Zealand political, religious or social elite. Given demographic probability, chances are that there might be a few.

Which raises the question: does Colin Craig share that Larry Craig wide stance?

My posts on the demise of the political Left in NZ have elicited a fair bit of debate, which is good. However, there are two main areas of misunderstanding in the debate that need to be corrected. The first is that that by repeating my oft-stated claim here and elsewhere that socio-economic class, and particularly the working classes, need to be the central focus of Left praxis, I am ignoring the productive and cultural changes of the post-industrial, post-modern era. The second is that I dismiss the entire Left as ineffectual losers.

Let me address the latter first. When I write about the “political” Left I am speaking strictly about those parts of the Left that directly involve themselves in politics, either institutionalized or not. In this category I do not include the cultural or activist Left that engage in direct action in non-political realms such as poverty alleviation, human rights protection, diversity promotion, etc. These type of Left indirectly address political questions and therefore have political import but are not immediately involved with or primarily focused on political matters (say, by acting as parties or running campaigns, among many other things). Some of their members may be, but the Left agencies involved are, first and foremost, non-political in nature.

In a way, these non-political Left entities act much like non-Left charities: they provide direct assistance to the disadvantaged or vulnerable, have clear political content in what they do, but are not political agencies per se.

Thus I recognize the good works of the non-political Left and even see them as providing potential foundation stones for effective Left political activism. But as things currently stand the interface between the non-political and political Left is largely skewed towards diluting the socialist content and neutering the working class orientation inherent in many forms of grassroots Left activism. And where the interface is direct (say, Socialist Aotearoa), the message is too vulgar and the agents too shrill to make their points effectively.

This may sound harsh but that is the reality. The larger point is that I am not dismissing the entire Left as “dead” or moribund. I am confining my diagnosis to the contemporary political Left, narrowly defined, and it is not defeatist to point out what I would have thought was glaringly obvious.

With regard to the second accusation, this has been the subject of much debate here at KP. Lew and Anita have both eloquently written on identity as a primary focus. I accept their arguments but also think that class matters when it comes to a Left praxis. To that end, let me reprise a statement I made in response to a comment made by reader Chris Waugh on the previous post.

Some people mistakenly believe that because I believe that a Left praxis has to be rooted in class consciousness I “dismiss” or neglect superstructural issues like gender, ethnic identity, environmental concerns and sexual preference.

I do not. However, I do not give these superstructural factors primacy in my thought because all of those forms of identification or orientation are non-universal, whereas insertion in a capitalist class system rooted in the exploitation of wage labor is a universal constant. Hence I see modern Left praxis as rooted in a working class consciousness, broadly defined to include all forms of non-managerial wage labor and all ethnicities, genders and preferences.

Put it this way: consider a situation where there is a female hourly worker and a female CEO of a major firm. What identification comes first when they meet each other in the social division of labor? Will identifying as female be so strong that it will bridge the class gap between them? Or will their class determine their relationship in the first instance?

Perhaps gender solidarity will prevail, as could be the case with being gay, Indian, bisexual etc. But I am simply unsure that these identifications universally supersede the class element and therefore should replace it as a focus of Left praxis.

So there you have it. Not all of the Left is ineffectual but the political Left certainly is. A working class orientation is necessary and central to any Left praxis but not sufficient to encompass the myriad of non-class progressive causes that make up the post-industrial Left. Resolving these issues and reconciling the dilemmas inherent in them are what must be done for the Left to regain a significant place in the NZ political arena.

It is the 150th anniversary of the Gettysburg Address and Jim Mora at RNZ remembered it. He invited me on to the Panel segment to discuss its relevance today with a person who is well informed and one who is less so but strongly opinionated. The segment occupies the first 10 minutes or so of the audio feature and I come in at about the 4:20 mark.

http://www.radionz.co.nz/audio/player/2576894

123456Next