antabuse in your system order viagra asp doxycycline hyclate oral tablet 100 mg information fertility drug like clomid for sale metohexal 50 mg zoloft can doxycycline hyclate 50 mg treat a sinus infection 1000 mg. metformin twice daily clomid dose missed can you buy clomid over counter australia do i need recipe to buy viagra in us cipla genric viagra store in india feline doxycycline hyclate 100 mg 2 times can doxycycline used treat yeast infection safe time between nitro and viagra viagra cialis prices ciprofloxacin difficulty urinating in the morning place in melbourne to buy viagra had a break with finasteride safe to start again can we buy viagra in a pharmacy in bangkok is cialis worth it billige viagra kaufen ohne propecia salusmaster hoh mg of prednisone do you give a 30lb dog prednisone 50 mg can it make me fertile dapoxetine in europe onde comprar cialis em brasilia cialis 20mg how maney rupese in india bestraling bijwerkingen prednisone estonian soviet socialist republic in square miles generico do viagra araujo y cost 75mg viagra diazepam tablets ip 10 mg prednisone cialis 5 mg ou 20 mg melatonin brandon marshall talking about viagra lasix 40 mg hunde tadalafil tablets india can anybody buy viagra does metformin really help diabetes best hotel in cipro cialis coupon discounts is zoloft best taken at night or morning amsterdam viagra for sale propranolol 20 mg bid cheap cialis same day shipping tubemaster alternatives to viagra nolvadex 10 mg tabletas electronicas should i take robitussin while on clomid how to avoid doxycycline nausea where to buy accutane no prescription how to ask your boyfriend to take viagra viagra online viagra buy prescription accutane for hormonal acne reviews claversal 500 mg dosierung ciprofloxacin how long viagra 25 mg works difference between generic brand name zoloft viagra get in uae cialis fast shipping glucophage corticosteroids herbal viagra pills review buy your viagra with paypal cpt code for cytotec delivery of fetus how long will prednisone stay in my system buy doxycycline combined with metronidazole over the counter viagra uk zoloft 75 mg to 100 mg gabapentin is 200 mg cialis too much to take maca vs viagra la metformina causa insuficiencia renal amoxil 250 mg capsules why do you take lasix prexanil combi 10 mg prednisone where can i buy viagra on the gold coast viagra sildenafil in india lowest order viagra low price diflucan usa can clomid be ordered online acne accutane treatment pastillas genericas de viagra amoxil howdotofound online prednisone hyperactivity in adults prednisone injection in the butt where to get clomid uk ciprofloxacin tablets uses cipro eye drops cialis in deutschland ohne rezept tadalafil may treat walgreen cialis cost sildenafil citrate 20 mg and bodybuilding what if you accidentally take two propecia in one day finasteride 1mg indian us propecia comparison phirst study tadalafil online use of finasteride in prostate cancer buy viagra for women uk donde comprar cytotec sin receta en guadalajara tia juana pharmacies price viagra 100mg cialis original 20mg kaufen prescriptions for propecia at costco who are the actors in the latest cialis ad to buy cipla produced cialis online clomid 100mg in a day is it ok to take viagra every day cialis over the counter in usa viagra substitute over the counter at gnc cialis on paypal viagra shops in nairobi shoppers drug mart canada cialis cost clomid best day availability of generic viagra in the united states safe take tylenol zoloft buy clomid thailand buy cheap pills cipro viagra generico da 25 mg can clomid cause you to miss a period shelf life of liquid doxycycline want to order viagra by phone how much doxycycline is safe to take kaletra truvada viagra generic free generic cialis pills quanto costa il cialis da 10 can i take viagra with cymbalta acrilato de potasio donde comprar viagra amoxicilline 250 mg bijsluiter viagra generic viagras from cyprus can you take antibiotics while on clomid detrusitol retard 4 mg beipackzettel ciprofloxacin substitute for viagra in indian viagra price in london viagra 100 mg dosing prednisolone 20 mg lamar buy cialis today com buy zithromax st.louis melhor generico sildenafil is 200 mg diflucan for yeast too strong where can i get viagra in batam can i take doxycycline with lansoprazole dicorvin 500 mg metformin ex pharmarx generic viagra como actua cialis 5 mg orde viagra online plan b or generic cialis 150 generic viagra cost of doxycycline at costco clomid where to order male clomid dosage glimepiride 1mg metformin 500 mg dosage validita sildenafil sandoz 100 mg can you take doxycycline with trimethoprim accutane sold usa teva sildenafil online 40 mg accutane initial breakout statistics cialis buy china im selling viagra in toronto apresoline 50 mg zoloft best indian viagra tablet margarine para hojaldre donde comprar viagra clomid price za generic cialis cost what is cialis black latest price of viagra in india amoxil in first trimester for sore throat cure comprare in italia on line il viagra donde consigo cialis generico mexico can generic viagra be purchased legally in uk allergic reaction to prednisone where to buy propecia in the uk price of 1tablet viagra in india cerealis viagra without doctor diflucan and candida in intestine why take doxycycline for malaria price for metformin er buy prednisone overseas pharmacy how does nolvadex work in males antenex 10 mg prednisone sildenafil comprimidos 50 mg buy mifegyne and misoprostol cytotec cialis 5mg kaina viagra and old man costume iwant to buy viagra in penang viagra in verbindung mit drogen buy viagra in malmo is viagra made in india compra cialis in svizzera ciprofloxacino en que casos se usa how many doses of viagra buy viagra online next day delivery uk buy viagra online in karachi what is the cost of cytotec cialis safe men high blood pressure cost of 100 mg of viagra can clomid make your period really light how much does viagra cost australia viagra price at walmart canada saroten retard 25 mg dosierung viagra viagra in 2 days why does cialis cause chest pain a list of retina specialist in fairfax va low cost alternatives and cialis cialis availability in pakistan cheap accutane sale lang en are there generic drugs for viagra prednisolone 2 mg preisers disease viagra buy 24.ru can you buy clomid in tj without where can i get viagra in canada doxycycline treats yeast infection manfaat vibramycin 100 mg digran tadalafil 20mg get viagra drug online does cialis cause itching finasteride comprar carro cheap sildenafil citrate generic release kann man viagra in der apotheke kaufen viagra savings and coupons arcoxia 120 mg wirkstoff cialis sildenafil tablets brands how much is viagra in the us viagra safe heart medication comprare zoloft online generic viagra nomes de bebe zovirax 400 mg dosing doxycycline hyclate safe take counteract stuffy nose from viagra can you take xanax with doxycycline how much is the 5mg cialis in walgreens what days of cycle to take clomid safe exercise while taking propranolol before bed neobrufen retard 800 mg 40 comprimidos viagra generic viagra cost comparison how to buy cialis discretely zithromax cost rite aid buy viagra wholesale what is the max dose of doxycycline puedo comprar cytotec en farmacias del ahorro can lasix cause constipation zithromax price mercury drug website viagra online compare prices como y cuando tomar viagra el viagra es de venta libre ct specialists in auto electrical problems 20 mg prednisone dosage for 7 days bobble water bottle review buy viagra online viagra rx finasteride 1.25 bestellen sealine s380 for sale in uk zithromax viagra canada use family care specialists in montebello famot 20 mg cialis buy viagra at tesco now viagra comprar mercado livre viagra price in taiwan viagra launch marketing does clomid or gonadotropins safer prednisone at walamrt prices indian aunty as viagra were to buy viagra chicago viagra availabile in kerala market much does viagra cost private prescription buy finasteride 1mg vertigon tablet 25 mg zoloft how to buy clomid in mexico cura di cialis da 5 mg saxagliptin metformin bioequivalence of generic drugs is it safe to take 30 mg cialis clomid means in hindi ampicillin use in obstetrics cheap viagra and delay spray buy finasteride trade shop clomid online using paypal account dolo specifico e generico de cialis clomid from the united states jersey city njpharmacy with discount on cialis wher could i get viagra her in jozi ampicillin dose in neonates propecia for menopausal women viagra to buy in qatar ciprofloxacin generic or brand name get prescription propecia canada where buy viagra los angeles danemark cialis 8 mg aprovel nombre generico de amoxil selgian 20 mg cialis come comprare il viagra senza ricetta medica std treatment with doxycycline ciprofloxacin hydrochloride tablets 500 mg ciprofloxacin 750 mg indication ciprodex otic 7.5 ml for dog ear doxycycline antimalarial costs abc pills nolvadex online ncelab generic cialis democratic socialism in the us mil 100 mg viagra apo tamox e clomid onde comprar papel sildenafil tablets 100 g nolvadex 20mg online how long before cialis for daily use works should accutane be taken at the same time everyday viagra shop pasha rabotaet cost of lasix 20 mg walmart propranolol eg 40 mg bijsluiter when do u use viagra pressure in head when taking viagra russkie pesni viagra online viagra price dropping how to use clomid properly zithromax baownbeuv price lasix 20 mg and mineral excretion farmacia online cialis svizzera map indian viagra dropshipper buy cialis using mastercard in china gow many mg of sildenafil in black ant want to buy clomid from the uk with out perscription cialis buy new zealand order cialis without prescription cod viagra dosage over 65 generic price on propecia riva 50 mg viagra price cialis retail viagra several days in a row prednisolone acetate 1 15 ml fluconazole diflucan price philippines finasteride 2 5mg doxycycline in kidney transplant patients effient 10 mg controindicazioni viagra particle size in ciprodex otic prednisolone 20 mg bijsluiter buscopan sildenafil genericon cosplay propecia johor bahru getting viagra australia inderal dosage in thyrotoxicosis cheapest generic tadalafil side best place to get cialis online doxycycline hyclate 100 mg bloody nose la cytotec puede causar la muerte ampicillin sale anxiolit 50 mg viagra kodein dak 25 mg bivirkninger av zoloft finasteride 5 mg and hair growth busik online viagra liquid tadalafil dosage forms metformin stada 500 mg nebenwirkungen generic accutane baownbeuv first time viagra users price viagra cialis azithromax price philippines should i take accutane quiz onde comprar cialis em porto alegre viagra for sale in usa stores find viagra 100mg cost in india can you buy viagra in barbados without a viagra best suppliers average cost of 20mg cialis tablet para que sirve el ciprofloxacino 750 mg can i carry viagra for someone else in a plane cialis other drugs cialis 5mg tablets australia metformin ukpds calculator zovirax ointment cost profenid 200 mg wirkung viagra can you cut cipro 500 mg in half cost viagra 50mg provera vs clomid diflucan price mercury drug philippines price viagra cebu delivery doxycycline for tick bite in dog cialis in pakistan phone number contramal retard 50 mg bijsluiter cialis best price pfizer 100mg viagra propecia online propecia price without insurance buy viagra uk lloyds pharmacy ireland nolvadex online kaufen priligy rezeptfrei bestellen how to buy generic viagra in south africa sildenafil 150 ml can you overdose on propranolol metformin mechanism of action drugbank database how to take prednisone pills viagra sales in europe clomid pills purchase online review sibutril 20 mg prednisone prednisone 10 mg dangerous metformin tablets in india zovirax in allattamento incinta dopo 4 mesi di clomid online can doxycycline treat tooth infection order cialis online europe clomid for women pregnancy delivery amoxicillin versus ampicillin cheap pfizer viagra online uk priligy in tschechien kaufen propranolol 80 mg cena zithromax package insert pdf in powerpoint viagra 25 mg teilen ciclopirox shampoo generico do viagra zithromax in tokyo is viagra safe for diabetes medline alternative to metformin hcl 500 mg tablet diferencia viagra 50 mg y 100mg zithromax price mercury drug side effect of metformin 500 mg klotrix generic propecia cheap glucophage hereisthebestin risks of clomid safe take viagra age 18 buy cytotec malaysia ag specialists in plato mn what happens if someone takes viagra how long does 10 mg of viagra last comprar cytotec en valledupar buy undergrund viagra in london sildenafil citrate 100mg gel viagra shop in dublin can you buy cialis over the counter in philippines can i buy cialis without prescription in doha viagra for sale shipping in canada huracan capsule 150 mg viagra best sight to buy viagra online causa y efecto de la pastilla cytotec generic metformin zydus zovirax 15 mg ointment specials where can i buy cialis in budapest black cobra sildenafil 120mg india doxycycline dosage to treat std ampicillin 1000 mg dosage what does a generic viagra pill look like separatis ciprofloxacin 500 mg where to buy viagra in christchurch cialis prostate cancer treatment buy prednisolone eye drops online anadrol for sale 50 mg zoloft dapoxetine brand names in pakistan iman zithromax 500 mg azithromycin dosage cheapest viagra overnight delivery viagra order cialis accutane reviews mayo clinic bee informed counter viagra substitute price para sirve metformina clorhidrato 850 mg use viagra for performance anxiety zithromax pediatrico prezzo london cipromed 500 usage zithromax out of body in how many days best price viagra uk viagra vs birth control counterfiet propecia medsafe data sheet metformin 500 sildenafil 50 mg srpski buy tadalafil turkey shipping in canada cheapest viagra can cialis cause priapism cost of prescription prednisone hard sell the evolution of a viagra salesman review comprar cialis generico urgente order ciprofloxin on line next day shipping buy doxycycline hyclate tablets without prescription case in vendita via cipro accutane cost south africa compare price of propecia can i buy in malaysia viagra at the pharmacy tadalafil 50mg online han tomado viagra online ratio metformin hcl 500 mg fincar vs propecia cost bayer cialis 2.5 mg how much does viagra cost in mexico city online viagra consumer check normal dosage clomid 8 doxycycline 100mg caps propecia brand on line cialis usa who sells zovirax in hong kong tamsulosin hcl 0.4 mg and viagra donde puedo comprar viagra en alicante propecia in black men best price propecia in uk 200mg viagra online ciprofloxacino 500 mg ariston para que sirve generic viagra ultrafarma medicamentos 200 mg clomid online necesito comprar viagra en chile cual es accutane pushing out blackheads in ears ciprofloxacin in treatment of gonorrhea cialis prix pharmacie cialis tablets price in pakistan lumia ampicillin brands in pakistan karachi where can i get liquid clomid viagra made in hongkong loratadine orifarm 10 mg bivirkninger av prednisolone lasix liquide diflucan is it over the counter pamorelin la 11 25 mg of zoloft nolvadex whartisthebestin for sale chances of having twins with clomid 100mg cost of real viagra at walmart propecia from india is it trustful buy generic viagra with a mastercard where shall i buy viagra in chennai zithromax 500mg price in pakistan viagra online australia legal age 100 mg prednisone to start getting pregnant on 150mg clomid Kiwipolitico » Blog Archive » Withdrawal from Echelon: a realistic watershed moment in intelligence reform or Left political posturing?

Withdrawal from Echelon: a realistic watershed moment in intelligence reform or Left political posturing?

datePosted on 15:34, June 20th, 2013 by Pablo

In light of the attention brought to matters of intelligence collection and analysis in recent months, it is entirely reasonable for the Greens and Labour to demand a fill inquiry into the organization, role and functions of the New Zealand intelligence community, including its responsibilities and obligations in international intelligence networks such as Echelon/5 Eyes and other less publicized arrangements. As the Kitteridge Report noted with regard to the GCSB and what the Zaoui case demonstrated in the case of the SIS, there were or are serious deficiencies in both agencies. These are as much if not more managerial than operational, but the truth is that a review of the entire intelligence community is overdue in light of the changing realities of intelligence gathering in the 21st century.

That is why the National government’s attempt to pass reforms to the 2003 GCSB Act that extend its domestic powers and scope of authority, coupled with the proposed Telecommunications (Interception Capability and Security) Bill that would, among other things, force telecommunications firms to provide backdoor access to their source and encryption codes, needs to be delayed until such time a proper inquiry into the entire espionage complex is undertaken. Without full understanding of areas of strength and weakness in the system, it is impossible to knowledgeably address the proposed reforms in the way signals intelligence is gathered and used in and by New Zealand, much less how it should be balanced against rights to privacy and institutional accountability.

As part of the calls for the inquiry, some on the Left have proposed that a review of New Zealand’s participation in Echelon be undertaken. Some have gone so far to say that it could become another watershed moment such as that surrounding the 1985 non-nuclear declaration. Presumably the watershed would be occasioned by a withdrawal from Echelon.

As much as I think that a review of New Zealand’s role in Echelon is welcome, especially in light of the Kim Dotcom case and recent revelations about mass scale meta-data mining by the US National Security Agency (and the meta-data mining by the GCSB revealed by the Kitteridge Report), I think that it would be absolute folly to withdraw from Echelon. Changes in the terms and conditions of New Zealand’s participation in Echelon may be warranted, but a full withdrawal from the signals intelligence-sharing community composed of the US, UK, Australia, Canada and NZ seems foolish.

I will not reiterate here the early warning, big picture and deep insight benefits that NZ accrues from being an Echelon partner. What I will note is that it has been a partner in Echelon for more than three decades, and as such shares some of the most guarded secrets, both historical and contemporary, of the Anglophone intelligence community. This includes methods, technologies, locations and sources for signals intelligence collection as well as the content of specific subjects of interest.

The Echelon partners will take a very dim view of these secrets suddenly becoming insecure as a result of a NZ withdrawal from Echelon. No matter what assurances may be given or what phased devolution of responsibilities is proposed, they are bound to fret about classified Echelon information falling into hostile hands as a result of that decision. That will likely prompt a full scope defensive counter-response to minimize the possibility of damaging or sensitive material falling into the “wrong” hands.

That response will far outweigh the diplomatic estrangement caused by the non-nuclear declaration (which ultimately amounted to a freeze on bilateral military-to-military contacts but which did not alter intelligence sharing or diplomatic relations in any significant measure). The negative consequences of withdrawal from Echelon will be felt in the intelligence arena, but will also be felt economically, militarily, and most definitely cyber-electronically, and will not just come from the other 5 Eyes partners.

Under a Labour/Green government that decides to withdraw from Echelon, New Zealand might seek to hedge its bets by establishing intelligence sharing ties with the People’s Republic of China or Russia. The first would complement the economic re-orientation towards the PRC in recent years, whereas the latter would cultivate relations with a long-term and now resurgent Western adversary (which is now in the process of re-deploying submarines to the South Pacific for the first time in over 20 years). Either move would show a clear commitment to diplomatic re-alignment away from traditional partners and towards Eurasia, something that would nicely complement the primary geographic focus of NZ’s trade-oriented foreign policy (we should remember that NZ is in the early stages of negotiations with Russia on a “free” trade agreement).

For both Russia and the PRC, gaining access to Echelon data would be invaluable even if the remaining 4 Eyes are forced to completely overhaul their systems in order to limit the damage caused by a NZ “flip.” In fact, the repercussions from such an act might force NZ to seek the security protection of either great power. One assumes that for this to happen the NZ public will be comfortable with the shift in alignment.

It is less probable that other Western nations such as France or Germany would want to jeopardize their relations with the Echelon community by entering into an alternative signals intelligence-sharing arrangement with NZ. Perhaps rising powers such as India, South Africa or Brazil might want to take advantage of the window of opportunity, but that also seems unlikely.

That is why I believe that the speculation about an inquiry into the intelligence community resulting in a “watershed” NZ withdrawal from Echelon is poorly considered. Escaping international commitments of any sort is fraught in many ways, and in order to do so the benefits of reneging must clearly outweigh the costs. The decision must enjoy broad support and be politically sustainable at home as well as abroad.

In that light, the benefits of a withdrawal from Echelon are uncertain and the downside of withdrawing from such a long-term and highly sensitive international security commitment is too great and too obvious for such talk to be anything but ignorant or Labour/Green posturing in the build up to next year’s elections. If that is the case, it undermines the Labour/Green bid to have a full inquiry into NZ intelligence community reform because there will be little support outside of select party factions for a move to withdraw from Echelon, and any reform initiatives that include that possibility will not be taken seriously.

It would therefore seem best for the Greens (in particular) and Labour to stifle such speculation from within their ranks in order for their calls for a full inquiry into the NZ intelligence community be given due consideration. That still leaves much room for review, but has a better chance of garnering broad-based support than by continuing to entertain thoughts about watershed moments.

18 Responses to “Withdrawal from Echelon: a realistic watershed moment in intelligence reform or Left political posturing?”

  1. Hugh on June 21st, 2013 at 03:21

    I think the idea of a Labour/Green government entering some kind of Echelon-like agreement with China, let alone Russia, is next to zero. The constituency that would be satisfied by an Echelon withdrawal would be just as angry at ‘selling our sovereignty’ to China or Russia as they would by the existing agreement.

  2. Pablo on June 21st, 2013 at 06:31

    I agree Hugh. In framing my thoughts I decided to take the speculation about withdrawal at face value and ponder the options given the likely consequences and the increasingly Eurasian-centric, trade dominated foreign policy. Once that outline is drawn, it becomes clear that such speculation can be nothing more than idle chatter done, at best, for factional political purposes.

  3. Sanctuary on June 21st, 2013 at 08:29

    At the moment, I doubt most New Zealanders will want to withdraw from Echelon. But the supreme dismissive arrogance of John Key and the whole bureaucratic establishment to public disquiet over intelligence gathering seems almost hell-bent on changing that.

    And then, yet again, the failure of our high handed and arrogant political elites to be bothered with trying to take the public along with them in matters of state security will create a situation where the elites will be in lockstep on one policy course to which the majority of the public will be opposed. The political/media elites will rely on elite consensus and its control of the establishment media to ensure the views of the majority of the population are suppressed. Maybe this wouldn’t matter if this was a one off, but from treaty settlements to constitutional reform to state security the reckless arrogance New Zealand political and media elites seem to be growing, and with it an increasingly impatient authoritarian intolerance of democratic dissent.

    And all the while our elite will have the temerity to sit around in the establishment media professing puzzlement at causes behind the rise and rise of the anti-establishment popular right.

    Such a situation cannot stand forever, and without change eventually there will be a breaking, probably in the form of a showdown between a Bolivarian populist government (which could nominally be either of the left or right) and the upper class elites which will certainly feature significant political violence. Then we can really welcome our entry to the third world.

  4. Pablo on June 21st, 2013 at 11:12

    Thanks Sanctuary, for the thoughts. I cannot say that I see a Boliviarian option in NZ’s future but I do share your concern with the arrogance and contempt exhibited by NZ political and corporate elites. One thing that struck me about the “watershed moment” discussion is that it appears to signal a breakdown in consensus between Labour and National on some key aspects of foreign (intelligence and security) policy. But then it occurred to me that political opportunism rather than principled difference was more likely at play, so I discount the notion that there truly is a difference between the major parties on intelligence matters.

    After all, the 5th Labour government started the expansion of the post 9-11 security state. It was the 5th Labour government that ordered the Urewera raids (those who continue to maintain that it was strictly a Police led operation with no government involvement are naive or willfully disingenuous). It was the 5th Labour government that initiated the reapprochment with the US on military and security issues, and which volunteered troops to ISAF in Afghanistan. It therefore seems improbable that Labour suddenly developed an aversion to participation in the Anglophone intelligence sharing network. That leaves political posturing as the explanation for Labour’s indulgence of the watershed talk.

  5. Anne on June 22nd, 2013 at 21:09

    Forgive me my ignorance on matters involving security intelligence, but could the watershed moment referred to… have more to do with some internal changes (perhaps managerial) to the way New Zealand engages with the ‘5 eyes’ countries rather than a withdrawal from Echelon?

    A withdrawal is not going to happen. I find it impossible to believe that the leadership of both political parties – Labour in particular – are seriously contemplating such a move. The notion is more likely coming from a small fringe group who, as you say, are indulging in political posturing and they can be readily discounted.

  6. Pablo on June 23rd, 2013 at 07:23

    Anne: There is a legitimate need to review the terms and conditions of NZ’s involvement with Echelon as well as the way in which the NZ intelligence community is organized and operates. That is what an inquiry should focus on. I agree that the chances of a withdrawal from Echelon are almost zero, which is why any talk of such coming from the Green/Labour side undermines the validity of their other concerns.

  7. rich on June 25th, 2013 at 12:43

    Echelon didn’t help us find out about the Rainbow Warrior or the Israeli passport scandal.

    I think we’re better protected against any real threats by old-fashioned policing. I’d suspect that the only information we get from the US is that which they consider it in their interests for us to have, and they’d still pass that on (or release it publically).

    NZ should transition to being a declared neutral state, like Ireland or Iceland, and stop playing at being part of the American’s club. Sure, they’d fume for a few years, but they’d settle down – it’s not like we’re pointing nukes at them.

  8. Pablo on June 25th, 2013 at 15:53

    Rich: The declared neutrality option is an interesting one and well worth public debate. It would obviously need to take into consideration the costs and benefits of such a move, to include the diplomatic, economic, geopolitical and security ramifications and repercussions that it would entail. That could be a complex equation.

    Echelon did not stop the Boston Bombers, the Bali bombers, the Madrid Bombers or the London bombers, and it certainly did not stop 9/11. It can not stop Lone Wolf or small-cell attacks if the perpetrators have any notion of operational security. Its main focus, and what has been lost in the coverage of the PRISM/Snowden revelations, is on traditional inter-state espionage even if it has added counter-terrorism to its duties.

    I agree that better policing, human intelligence and counter-intelligence work is what it is most required, but as a complement rather than a substitute for signals and technical intelligence sharing with larger partners.

  9. l_f on June 25th, 2013 at 16:32

    Pablo considering you advocate a review of GCHQ- Do you think this new legislation for expanded powers in GCHQ New Zealand, will gain traction and become law or will this only aggravate the public?

    http://tvnz.co.nz/politics-news/growing-opposition-more-powers-spy-agency-5475070

  10. Pablo on June 25th, 2013 at 18:49

    l_f:

    Although I can see the need to “tidy up” the legislation that covers when, how and why the GCSB can assist other domestic agencies in an era in which transnational threats and cyber crime is prevalent, the current Bill is not suitable in its present form. It awards too much latitude and discretion in the issuance of warrants pursuant to national security upon which GCSB involvement can be authorized and has too little oversight of the process involved in the issuance of those warrants. It does not specify the agencies to which assistance can be rendered and under what conditions (leaving open the possibility that any agency can receive such assistance for reasons that do not have to do with threats to national security). It leaves it to two people (the PM and yet another retired judge) to issue warrants whereby the GCSB can involve itself in domestic signals or cyber espionage. In other words: too broad, too loose, too opaque and too lacking in oversight and accountability to be an effective governance framework for domestic signals and cyber espionage.

    It also commits the GCSB to a more regular and likely increased role in domestic security, which detracts from its core missions of monitoring foreign signals and countering foreign cyber and signals espionage. Given that it has a total complement of 290 people, that could force more work on staff that in turn can lead to a diminishing of performance standards in one or more areas.

    And even if it could handle its added responsibilities while performing its other tasks, the proposed legislation will not enhance its ability to counter threats such as the Boston Bombers, who even the NSA/PRISM/Verizon meta-data trawl could not detect (or Fort Hood shooter Major Hassan, who was in email and phone contact with the American al-Qaeda leader in Yemen prior to his attack). So the PM was being idiotic, ignorant or disingenuous in specifically suggesting that the proposed Bill could help prevent such types of attack.

  11. […] on Kiwipolitico asks if  Withdrawal from Echelon: a realistic watershed moment in intelligence reform or Left political postu… Pablo writes, “ As the Kitteridge Report noted with regard to the GCSB and what the Zaoui case […]

  12. Hugh on June 26th, 2013 at 12:23

    @rich: Just for the record, Iceland is a member of NATO. It is not a declared neutral state. You might be thinking of Sweden or Finland (although neither state’s ‘neutral’ status stopped it from significant intelligence collaboration with NATO during the Cold War).

  13. RJL on June 27th, 2013 at 12:46

    I think what the debate needs is some more information about precisely what benefit NZ receives, if any, directly from being a member of Echelon.

    There are lots of nebulous claims about Important National Security work, but it is unclear precisely what that means. What *useful* information does NZ really get that we couldn’t just get from our overseas diplomatic officers trawling the cocktail circuit?

    The only real benefit seems to be the indirect one of being seen to be in the American camp. Which is potentially not seen as beneficial at all by some countries that we interact with, i.e. China.

  14. Chris Trotter on June 27th, 2013 at 13:01

    Given the propensity of the DGSE to leak like, well, a damaged ‘swimming pool’, is it your contention, Pablo, that neither MI6 nor the NSA/CIA had the slightest idea that the French were about to stage a “black op” against Greenpeace in New Zealand?

    If so, then it is difficult to calculate the value Echelon adds to NZ’s security.

    On the other hand, if our “allies” knew what was coming and didn’t see fit to warn us, then justification for remaining a party to the UKUSA Agreement becomes an even harder sell.

    Wouldn’t it be more straightforward to simply draw people’s attention to the fate of the Whitlam Government after it toyed with the idea of shutting down Pine Gap?

    Isn’t it true that the UKUSA Agreement is a bit like the Hotel California?

    “You can check-out any time you like/ But you can never leave.”

  15. Hugh on June 27th, 2013 at 13:35

    @Chris: It’s Moscow that the DGSE has historically leaked to, not London or Langley.

  16. Pablo on June 27th, 2013 at 14:23

    RJL: I agree that a bit more information about the benefits received from being an Echelon partner would be helpful. That is one reason why I support a full inquiry on the NZ intelligence community before modifying any existing legislation, and why I think that the role of the GCSB in Echelon needs to be reviewed and debated along with a review of the functions and focus of other NZ intelligence agencies as well as the lack of (and need for) robust independent intelligence oversight mechanisms.

    The quality of NZSIS HUMINT overseas is poor and its scope is quite limited, and NZ diplomatic reporting is not that much better when it comes to security matters and threat assessment, so I am not sure that trawling the diplomatic cocktail circuit can compensate for a withdrawal from Echelon. In terms of getting a read on the threat environment and early warning of developing international events, diplomatic talk is cheap; intercepts of classified communications are better, direct confidential access to decision-makers is best.

    The question of the day is where the GCSB-managed intercepts are focused: near or far abroad (and to what extent at home)? State or non-state actors? Military, diplomatic or commercial? “Friendly” or “unfriendly” entities?

    I do believe that trying to be first-tier intelligence and security partners with the US while becoming increasingly reliant on trade with the PRC is untenable over the long term.

    Chris: I would not be surprised if the French ran the operation undetected by other great powers since it did not negatively affect those power’s interests at the time and reaffirmed the view that it is unwise to trifle with so-called strong states. Let us remember that those were different geopolitical and strategic “times” and the utility of Echelon for NZ today cannot be reduced to its action or inaction in that particular case.

    Drawing the parallel with the Whitlam government is slightly more appropriate (but still a stretch, since the current CIA ability to orchestrate the toppling of a current NZ government is minimal at best, and the Cold War logics that surrounded the Whitlam government’s fall no longer obtain). In any event my concern is more on the foreign implications of a withdrawal rather than domestic consequences.

    And yes, it is a bit like Hotel California. Presumably the service is better.

  17. RJL on June 27th, 2013 at 15:22

    While our elite diplomatic cocktail drinkers might have a limited scope; what do we really need to know? What existential security threats to NZ is the GCSB defending against? Our big problems seem to revolve around properly filling out the paperwork for meat exports. It’s not clear that Echelon is much help there.

    Also it perhaps speaks volumes about the focus (or competency) of our intelligence community that Ploughshares Aotearoa, and TV3 (twice!) have managed to plan and execute “attacks” on Waihopai station.

  18. Pablo on June 27th, 2013 at 15:45

    RJL:

    Although there is a bit of a Cold War legacy air about Echelon and the NZ eavesdropping stations, being part of that network may accrue greater dividends than are immediately apparent (for example, diplomatic support on issues of primary concern to NZ). Again, this is worth public discussion because as you have said before, at this point it is not clear what those benefits may be.

    The intrusions at Waihopai are not the fault of the intelligence operators but of the (I believe private) security services that were contracted to guard the facility. Neither the electronic perimeter defences or on-site human security appear to be up to the task of guarding a top secret facility, something that no doubt has been raised by the Echelon partners in the wake of the events you mention.

Leave a Reply

Name: (required)
Email: (required) (will not be published)
Website:
Comment: