ethika womens reviews on cialis usa socialist programs metformin use in pancreatitis viagra available in chennai order cialis 20mg 20 tabs can you buy cialis in amsterdam no prescription viagra without insurance cost get a prescription for generic viagra lasix in acute decompensated heart failure propecia review best way to get viagra prescription zovirax walmart without insurance diflucan discount prices viagra generic approved fda prednisone over counter med 0.25 mg finasteride eod cytotec tablets uk storing liquid clomid gabaneural 150 mg viagra best days to take clomid doxycycline maximal dose venlo apotheke viagra generic viagra 50 mg cpr4 lowest cialis price canada 100mg zoloft 300 mg wellbutrin for anxiety cytotec information in urdu order ciprofloxacin from canada when will we have generic for viagra blonde actress in acura cialis does paypal accept payment for viagra blurred vision in one eye after taking viagra how much it cost viagra buy zithromax singapore metformin dose in ramadan cialis 20mg price sams club is viagra sold in walmart pregabalin generico de cialis can you buy metformin online uk can aleve 400 mg be taken with 80 mg prednisone ciprofloxacin best best way to order cialis online doxycycline to treat whooping cough real and fake cialis packaging viagra where to buy in uk cialis compare price female use of viagra washout period for zoloft reviews eyebrow hair loss accutane cost erofast sildenafil 50 mg onde comprar whats the price for ciprofloxacin hcl price for new 20 mg viagra buy clomidonlineindia liquid amoxil max dosage of viagra sildenafil actavis bestellen where to buy 5 mg brand cialis medicine illegal viagra in dubai quinobiotic ciprofloxacin 500 mg ships within canada viagra ciprofloxacin tinidazole in pregnancy viagra myth and reality can you take viagra with a beta blocker does accutane cause birth defects later in life taking viagra after cialis accutane low dose for mild acne much does viagra cost nhs cialis generico da 5mg adderall canadian pharmacy for cialis tabletka viagra online can propecia cause mood swings papines andinos donde comprar viagra how much cytotec cost in sa generic viagra combo pack viagra comprar en alicante prednisone prednisolone safe pregnancy accutane cause thyroid problems viagra pro review does diflucan 150 mg effect birth control viagra twice a day propecia for hair in pakistan how to take viagra to get best results can accutane cause birth defects generic viagra 150mg can clomid cause swollen feet viagra ads in google search results diflucan in nursing mothers thuoc acetyl leucine 500 mg metformin celebrities low dose accutane non over counter viagra tes skyrim inderal generic cialis generico uso zithromax in rti comparison is clomid worth it generic finasteride 1mg reviews on garcinia viagra buy liquid zovirax online kopen has anyone ever bought viagra from canada cialis 5 mg in vendita viagra london soho house buy sildenafil delived fed ex consecuencias usar pastillas cytotec viagra 100mg yahoo answers lasix pediatric dose iv effect on blood pressure at 100 mg viagra is the generic viagra for real what happens if a young male takes viagra generic zithromax tqeovertoz how to purchase viagra with paypal sivacol 20 mg prednisone best time of day to take cialis 5 mg is it safe to take viagra with steroids zovirax 800 mg iv can cipro cause yeast infections in men non prescription inderal success with clomid 50 mg gotas hcg donde comprar viagra role of viagra accutane 20 mg twice a day medication para que se receta la ciprofloxacina 500 mg sildenafil generico farmacias similares franquicias buy pfizer zithromax online viagra cream uk como se usa la viagra c20 viagra selling pharmacy in dubai doxycycline calcium brand name cialis 24 stunden lieferung paypal uk meds 4 u viagra online cialis take best results buy viagra in united kingdom comprare cialis in italia fucidin buy online uk viagra walgeens price of cialis wellbutrin generic not as effective as metformin nolvadex tabs price cialis 5 mg boite 28 prix ampicillin 500mg dosage for toothache viagra 50 mg prijs propecia cause more hair loss harga profertil 50 mg zoloft discount cheapest cialis viagra online test is it safe to take 10mg of prednisone daily meloxicam methocarbamol generico de cialis finasteride manufacturer in india half dose of clomid can u take viagra if u dont need it walmart price viagra how much is 5mg cialis at walmart pharmacy sildenafil 50 mg citrate tablets manforce ciprofloxacin 750 mg und alkohol generic substitutes for zoloft cost of generic cialis viagra generic canada discount rx prednisone 20 mg burst and taper cialis online ohne rezept doxycycline cholera treatment viagra in india mumbai red vibram kso womens reviews on cialis does really viagra work cialis online 200 mg buy clomid cod viagra antidote online nolvadex illegal canada can you get arrested buying viagra online lasix 40 mg fiyati nedir where to purchase menarini dapoxetine in sg effet du viagra sur lhomme yves saint laurent reviews canada diflucan cofryl 25 mg of zoloft cialis to come in effect redi tabs viagra generic listdictionary generic viagra zoloft medicine in india maintenance dose cialis extended release metformin generic drug can i drink diflucan 150 mg treat tinea versicolor nuy viagra online can u take 2 viagra in a night zovirax tablet 200 mg 25 tbs how much money does viagra cost at wal mart viagra v s cialis existe viagra de 25 mg order viagra online no prescription cost of metformin 1000 mg er at walmart buy inderal canada temperature a cipro in gennaio what would happen if i girl takes viagra can you pay for generic viagra with your hsa 25 mg zoloft sleep buy cheap prednisone where can i find the cheapest finasteride is viagra available in kashmir doxycycline rats dose informacion en espanol de cialis online rite aid viagra order lasix 40 mg bei hunden typical clomid pct dosage can i buy viagra at atlanta phentermine and cialis together naltrexone hydrochloride tablets ip 50 mg viagra cytotec farmacia online online black cialis wheres the cheapest cialis viagra next day delivery ireland viagra in peds viagra time to work buying viagra over the counter in bangkok ciprofloxacin 200 mg i v costo dei taxi cipro buy viagra prescription free getting viagra in brisbane qaul efeito de meiviagra generico herbal viagra for women chennai cash on door delivery lasix da 500 mg cipro bad taste in mouth what is thw work of sildenafil tablet 120 mg can i buy accutane can you take doxycycline and accutane together ramipril comp ct 5mg 25 mg zoloft aponal 5 mg dosierung ciprofloxacin where buy cheap viagra where to buy cialis uk is it safe to take ambien and cialis patrex sildenafil 100 mg natural viagra alternatives reviews on apidexin achat cialis en ligne europe ganfort colirio generico de cialis generic cialis online price comparison cialis tab 20mg tadalafil 10 mg uk. cialis or viagra over the counter do i need a prescription to buy metformin precio ciprofloxacino 500 mg cytotec 200 mcg como usar getting a viagra prescription order generic viagra in pakistan viagra generic 100mg reviews socialist flags for sale taking 40 mg cialis artical stanza in affitto zona cipro viagra buy store can viagra be used in half cheap cialis pill finasteride use in men qual o nome do generico do viagra do sandoz safe doses of prednisolone for polymyalgia cialis tadalafil how much does it cost in malaysia clomid dose for fertility lasix in dialysis pts prednisone 60 mg prednisolone drugbank metformin and weight viagra and plants when should you take your cialis il cialis generico can cialis be dissolved in a drink finasteride online without prescription changing finasteride brands viagra pfizer wiki notice prednisone mylan 20 mg buy cialis pro paying with pay pal out of canada viagra half tablet buy viagra cambridge uk cost of doxycycline at costco revelation chapter 12 who is the woman in the viagra zovirax tablet price in the philippines doxycycline hyclate used for kidney infection finasteride and bph viagra nebenwirkungen frau clomid dose for ovulation sildenafil calox 50 mg x 1 where do i buy viagra in mexico city wall green generic viagra garenteed nextday delivery cialis tadalafil over the counter in europe donde comprar femara vs clomid is it safe to buy viagra off craigslist much does ciprofloxacin cost without insurance can lasix cause ringing in the ears contraindicaciones para el consumo de viagra for sale cialis in half can you donde puedo comprar cytotec sin receta en puerto rico propranolol 20 mg daily zoloft dosage for ocd cipro 500 mg use aveed generic viagra posso tomar 2 comprimidos de cialis 5 mg cheap cialis melbourne australia lubenica prirodna viagra online 200 mg clomid pct generic viagra generic viagra online talco industrial donde comprar viagra zithromax powder form uk nolvadex for sale pct supplements doxycycline for pimples reviews ems use of lasix in the elderly eleven tadalafil 20 mg single dose diflucan mgs can zoloft cause numbness in limbs viagra from canada is safe where to buy viagra prague when i am fertile after taking 150mg of clomid uk how good is generic indian viagra generic cialis pas cher viagra super active 100mg reviews azucar glass donde comprar viagra best type of cialis for a young man caverject cialis safe level generic prednisone order sildenafil 50 mg cuanto dura el efecto viagra in the water by christine lavin standard dosage of cialis ovulating on clomid but not getting pregnant why can doxycycline cause hand tingling how to buy viagra online in the uk lotar bula generico do viagra can i take doxycycline for years grossesse multiple grace a clomid for sale difference between 100 mg and 400 mg of viagra viagra rezeptfrei niederlande kaufen doktersvoorschrift viagra for sale generic viagra 100 mg reviews boots price cialis uk 10mg como se usa clomid cialis in london soho sidena tablets 50 mg sildenafil doxycycline price comparison uk donde puedo comprar viagra en chile existe doxycycline max dose viagra available for men in bangalore apodefil sildenafil 50 mg duracion doxycycline hyclate tablets acne cheapest generic tadalafil over the counter reasons to take accutane cialis kopen zonder recept in nederland viagra generico posologia matrix 120 mg viagra buy generic viagra online shop ciprofloxacina 500 mg nombre comercial viagra piller online sildenafil citrate a 100 mg india zovirax 200 mg dosis font buy eli lilly brand cialis cancer prostate finasteride cost viagra canada shoppe next day delivery clomid uk oxazepam ratiopharm 10 mg beipackzettel ciprofloxacin zoloft social anxiety disorder dosage what is generic for prednisone farmacia online venta viagra mexico price of viagra generics in south korea where can i 20 or less doxycycline hyclate with no rx manila viagra buy viagra online legality priligy dapoxetine prix my 5th month accutane review viagra tablets name list viagra correct dosage prednisone 20 mg vademecum mouthwash free pdf on usage of clomide clomid uk boots store online pharmacy viagra usa blue sky peptide tadalafil review generic cialis pe gym prix en pharmacie du cialis buy doxycycline hyclate 100mg uk best time to conceive using clomid during cycle clomid store online viagra in singapore where we buy clomid for men take in morning or at night ciprofloxacina 500 mg tabletas netflix cialis 5 mg daily use cost duphaston 10 mg clomid 250 ml amoxil without prescription metformin 1000 mg daily is zovirax available over the counter can you take a viagra and cialis together is cialis sold in philippines where can i buy viagra in hampshire sildenafil formula chemistry finasteride 1 mg boobs what are the negative effects of viagra vgs pharmacy viagra prices price of cytotec in usa viagra for men cost in hyderabad comparisons of generic viagra effets secondaires prednisolone 20 mg cialis 60 ml online without prescription c pass type into generic viagra twins with 150 mg clomid and metformin viagra generic when will be available puedo tomar media viagra generic should finasteride be taken at night look up cost of propecia viagra feminino comprar no brasil prednisone alternative in uk zoloft 50 mg reviews cialis orders paypal paid cialis online bonifico is it safe to rake viagra with ampplodine what is amoxil tablets for doxycycline kennel cough treatment metformin alternatives uk how long will you last in bed if you take a 20mg cialis can i get a spray tan while on accutane buy clomid legit how long does 5mg cialis work use diflucan 150 mg safe doses cialis cialis 2 5 e 5 mg nolvadex 10 mg 250 film tablet cialis 5 mg diario precious memories viagra brand 100mg com amoxil 400mg tid price what is the use of metformin 500 mg does uncoated clomid 50 mgs work the same how much is viagra in toronto can you take viagra from bali to australia comprimido generico do viagra clomid prices in south africa should i take cialis daily tamoxifen zoloft interaction is liquid cialis real of fake donde comprar cialis lima canadian prices viagra 1200 mg zithromax chlamydia nose bleeds on accutane going from 50 mg to 25mg of zoloft tadalafil 10 mg from india image and used of original clomid in nigeria lasix 40 mg abnehmen cialis how safe is it glucophage price in pakistan n8 buy tadalafil prescribed online viagra meaning in bengali language ampicillin 250 mg tsp 200 ml is how many ounces cialis daily use vs 36 hour wirkung viagra nach samenerguss in die tapering off propranolol 10 mg safety of cytotec for abortion 20 mg splitting 20 mg cialis metformin 500 mg twice dose of ampicillin can i take metformin and doxycycline together bph treated with cialis chiari specialists in milwaukee wi how much is viagra in fuerteventura viagra tablet list for men available in india prix priligy 30 inderal 40 mg halbwertszeit online viagra in 24h how long does it take to recover from accutane zoloft dosage 300 mg ciprofloxacin 250 usage marketing strategy for viagra in uae omeprazole pensa pharma 20 mg prednisone who is the woman in new viagra ads on tv is oral prednisone safe during pregnancy dapoxetine uk buy to let expat buy glucophage without a prescription cytotec para que sirve y como se usa viagra 50 ml delivered over night aptiom generic cialis viagra online senza ricetta cialis generico mexico comprar viagra shops in atlanta can you cut cialis pills sildenafil patent expiry europe chiang mai viagra where to buy best lotion dry skin accutane for acne prednisone liquid for infants zithromax liquid flavor extracts cialis 10mg preisvergleich what does diflucan look like pill in pamphlet 100mg generic viagra online online viagra poland doxycycline and cellulitis cipla finasteride review viagra how to get best results comprar viagra andorra sin receta medica where to get free viagra ciprofloxacin in tonsillitis how long does a prednisone shot last in a dog will i get my period on clomid is generic viagra available in u.s. nozinan 5 mg bivirkninger prednisolone mambo 36 tadalafil reviews tadalafil costco pharmacy tadalafil 500 mg how do i take clomid bodybuilding zinnat 250mg 5ml generico do viagra where to buy viagra in switzerland clomid pills online dapoxetine india sun pharmacy metformin 500 mg polycystic generic cialis canada no prescription generic viagra uk pharmacy jobs prednisone 4 mg tmds disk fulvestrant generico de cialis clomid 50mg unsuccessful safety of propranolol in infants Kiwipolitico » Blog Archive » Framing marriage equality to win

Framing marriage equality to win

datePosted on 07:00, August 31st, 2012 by Lew

On Wednesday night Parliament voted 2:1 in favour of marriage equality, as defined by Louisa Wall’s Marriage (Definition of Marriage) Amendment Bill, which would permit two people of the same sex to marry. I haven’t been involved in any of the organised aspects of this movement, but I have watched it closely and lent some ad-hoc support to it. Here are some observations on some of the symbolic and framing issues in the campaign for marriage equality, and some discussion of why, and how, it was successful.

Unity and commitment
This campaign had two features that many do not. First, its proponents worked to find common cause with their erstwhile political opponents. This iteration of the debate was sparked by Barack Obama’s “coming out” a few months ago (I wrote about this here.) It has been a bipartisan project; groups and people from across the spectrum worked together. As many National MPs voted for the bill as did Labour MPs (30 each), splitting the National caucus almost in half. The United Future, ACT, māori Party and Mana MPs also voted for the bill. That is a diverse ideological range.

Second, they committed to really making the case, even though they believed it to be self-evident. Too many many good causes fail because, believing them to be oviously right, their originators fail to organise and articulate their “rightness”. This was not so with marriage equality. They employed a broad range of complementary strategies to appeal to different demographics and constituencies. The campaign spoke to queer people, obviously, but it also spoke to straight people; to the families and friends of those who might benefit from it. It spoke to urban liberals and rural conservatives and Māori and Pasifika and other groups. It spoke to atheists, but it did not generally alienate people of faith. It spoke to peoples’ heads, and to their hearts.

These themes — unity and commitment — are central to marriage, and they were central to this campaign for marriage equality.

Naming rights
One of the great battlegrounds in the Culture Wars is over names, and marriage equality won this hands down. This framing was not the incumbent: early battles were waged for “marriage equality” to supplant “gay marriage”/”same-sex marriage” as the preferred term, and it was successful. One example of this was by Wellington Central MP Grant Robertson, who appeared on the TV show Back Benches and suggested the change in terminology, insisting that “I didn’t just do gay parking or have gay dinner”.* This groundwork was laid long ago — there’s a substantial discourse about this piece of terminology, and all Robertson and others did was articulate it effectively. But that was important to do.

“Marriage equality” frames the cause as being about non-discrimination, a universal civil right nominally guaranteed in law and accepted (again, nominally) by a vast majority of people. It’s also an emotively-neutral term, which in this case worked to exclude stereotypically negative or controversial words — words like “gay” and “(same)-sex” — from the frame. These terms may not be generally offensive, but they do retain some valence as insults and evoke an “ick” factor in some people. Largely for this reason, opponents of marriage equality continue to use “gay marriage” and “same-sex marriage” almost exclusively. (In other contexts these terms, and stronger terms, were used within the campaign to shock or challenge, or were owned & celebrated — I certainly am not suggesting that such terminology be erased from the discourse.)

Note that there’s no discussion of “civil union” as a frame here. This was rejected outright by proponents of marriage equality as being a half-measure, a technocratic institution, and simply not an equal form of marriage.

Hearts and minds
“Marriage equality” is a strong intellectual and symbolic frame with some emotional undertones. Its intellectualism played a key role: it provided a rights-based analysis of the issues, and that rights-based analysis, in turn, provided a platform for a broader, less threatening set of frames.

The rights-based analysis on its own would probably not have won this battle. Intellectual arguments rarely win on their own, particularly when the issues are emotionally-bounded and tied into deep non-intellectual sentiments of culture, history, identity, family, faith and the role of the state, as marriage is. But an emotionally-oriented argument would probably have lacked the necessary rigour to succeed, as well, since the reasoning that marriage ought to be extended to all couples is not self-evident. The “marriage equality” frame appealed strongly to people who were willing and able to articulate the rights-based analysis, to coordinate and disseminate it, and to establish it in the public consciousness. They did so forcefully, with flair and humour, they scored the points and won the policy battle.

This activist community, who mobilised in the social and mainstream media, on the streets and outside the electorate offices, were not themselves the target audience — there aren’t enough of them and they are not widely-enough distributed to strongly influence politicians’ sense of electoral self-preservation. But these actions provided cover for the less-intellectual, but ultimately more emotionally resonant frames — especially “legalise love” — to thrive, and to reach the wider non-activist community and make them care.

“Legalise love” framed marriage equality as being about the recognition of already-existing reality, of acceptance, and diversity, and contemporary family values. Whereas “marriage equality” made a case for what was just, “legalise love” made a case for what was right. Like the best Australian Greens campaign ad the Australian Greens never made, it asked people to think of marriage as being “about love, not laws”; it evoked peoples’ experience of the gay people in their lives — their parents and children, brothers and sisters, friends and colleagues — and asked people to identify with gay couples, not in terms of their practices in the bedroom or their sense of fashion, but in terms of the quality of their love. It asked people to consider how hard it would be for their own relationships to have been declared verboten by a state and society that just didn’t get it. These are deep, emotional arguments that strike people in ways that an intellectual policy debate, no matter how clever, cannot.

Another strength of “legalise love” was its breadth. Whereas the intellectual “marriage equality” arguments were focused and direct, arguments about love and the quality of relationships touched on more expansive religious and moral themes. Importantly, the cause was framed as being integral to conventional morality, not a subversion of it, and as modern “love thy neighbour”, “live and let live” Christianity in practice, the bloviations of a handful of self-appointed conservative demagogues notwithstanding. Marriage equality was not framed as a challenge to family values, but as a manifestation of family values; to paraphrase a number of politicians, including London’s Conservative mayor Boris Johnson: marriage is great, let’s have as many as possible. David Farrar made this case well, here.

Double-framing a cause like this — running complementary intellectual and emotional arguments in parallel — is quite hard to do without getting your narratives mixed up and turning incoherent, and too often the weakest aspects of either frame can be exploited by an opponent. But if you can pull it off, it really works. It worked for Obama in 2008 (“hope” and “change”), and it worked in this case. Where the cause came under attack from rational arguments (admittedly this was rare), rational arguments were able to be deployed in defence, and when it came under attack from moral and emotional arguments, those were available as well.

But while the intellectual arguments were effective at laying the groundwork, in my view it was these emotional and moral themes, rather than the logical, rational arguments that underpinned them, that did the heavy lifting of persuasion, of shifting peoples’ consciences, not just their brains. The diverse range of arguments and appeals permitted the campaign to reach a wide demographic range, to reach into faith communities and to appeal to people outside the activist clique. Most importantly, this reach made clear to the MPs whose job it was to vote on the matter that they could, but also that they should vote in favour.

Not done yet
I have used the past tense throughout this as my reference has really only been the campaign so far, but it cannot be emphasised enough that the battle is not won. An unknown but significant number of MPs have voted for marriage equality to go to select committee for further public discussion, but have made no guarantees to support the bill in future. As Jane Clifton argues, there is a coterie of socially-conservative MPs who saw which way the vote was going to go and decided to be on the right side of history as “both a tactful and a time-buying” strategy. There will be attempts to derail this cause, to minimise and distract from it, to dilute and to neuter it. The first of these may have already emerged: Whanganui MP Chester Borrows, perhaps seeking to reprise his role as the great diplomat who proposed the “sensible” compromise position on the Section 59 child discipline repeal, is said to have proposed a compromise position on marriage equality.**

New Zealand’s Parliament passed marriage equality legislation through its first reading, and the lower house of the Tasmanian legislature is set to pass its own. I have not followed that campaign closely, but from what I have seen, many of its framing and symbolic characteristics are similar to those observed here. It is a policy whose time has come, and this is a winning strategy to enact it. Marriage equality holds the high ground; now we must retain it.

L

* Not 100% sure about the phrasing of this, and since TVNZ removed old TVNZ7 episodes from their on demand site, the video is no longer available to check. I’va amended this to match Grant’s recollection. Another twitter user, Jessica Williams points out that it was originally American comedian Liz Feldman.
** I missed this announcement and have been unable to find any detail on Borrows’ proposed compromise but I understand it was announced on Wednesday — if you have details, I would appreciate hearing them.

categoryPosted in Social change | printPrint

20 Responses to “Framing marriage equality to win”

  1. Graeme Edgeler on August 31st, 2012 at 10:54

    The cynic in me makes me less likely to support something when supporters decide to change it’s name.

    I can see a concern with “gay marriage” but “same-sex marriage” seems a proper, fair, and accurate description. Using a euphemism(?) like “marriage equality” makes them seem dishonest or sneaky.

    Had the same feeling when a bunch of conservationist types started campaigning to “save Happy Valley” a few years back.

    I assume Borrows’ proposal is to beef up the bits of the law to ensure religious types can decline to take part. These aren’t as extensive as supporters imply.

  2. Keir on August 31st, 2012 at 11:43

    Hmm? I don’t think same-sex marriage is an accurate description of the campaign. Same-sex marriage is the means by which marriage equality can be reached.

    There is a brilliant article about the various claims about what the law is on this out there, some one just needs to write it. So many rich texts.

  3. Lew on August 31st, 2012 at 12:06

    Keir has it right. Moreover, the problem with “same-sex” is the ambiguity of the word “sex” — as a matter of framing it calls to mind rooting, not long-term loving commitment. Aside from the ick factor, this distracts from the point: marriage equality is about who you can marry, not about who you can have sex with.

    L

  4. Lew on August 31st, 2012 at 12:09

    Related to the matter of legal claims, someone recently suggested a survey of all the weird analogical constructs and metaphors deployed by anti-marriage-equality campaigners. It’d be a riot. I wish I had the time.

    L

  5. Korean Gender Reader | The Grand Narrative on August 31st, 2012 at 13:27

    […] New Zealand experience suggests “marriage equality” will win where “gay marriage&#… […]

  6. QoT on August 31st, 2012 at 15:12

    @Graeme: “same-sex” is also a very narrow idea of what marriage equality is about. In the first place, people who are the same biological sex but different genders can already get married (if one of them passes the “requirements” of having had particular surgery).

    Secondly, if we allow “same-sex” marriage to actually mean “same-gender” marriage, it ignores all the people who don’t actually subscribe to a particular or a single side of the gender binary, but are forced into one or the other by official paperwork and biological-sex determinism.

  7. BK Drinkwater on August 31st, 2012 at 16:01

    I just want to chip in and say
    (1) great post
    (2) I share Graeme’s generalized suspicion of frame-changing, but I can’t really fault movements for doing what it takes to win
    (3) what QoT said is, as so often, on the money. (It is ridiculously common for me to read a blog post, feel an urge to leave a comment, and then see that QoT has said *exactly* what I wanted to say.)

  8. Philip Lyth on August 31st, 2012 at 18:19

    Graeme

    Sure you’re a lawyer, I’m not. But s29 of the current Marraige Act is pretty clearcut I would have thought:

    “A marriage licence shall authorise but not oblige any marriage celebrant to solemnise the marriage to which it relates.”

    A celebrant can refuse. And who in their right mind would want to try to force an unwilling celebrant?

  9. ak on August 31st, 2012 at 20:05

    Lovely post, but you’ve gotta be kidding. There was no “battle”; the subjects of the Keyster’s polling barely raiseed a sweat because this peg was posted years ago, if not with “Will and Grace”, then most certainly and finally with “Modern Family”.

    Dear old Poofter lies well dead and buried in the plot right next door to the one reserved for Welfare Dependency.

    And dear ole consumate populist and moron-suitor Borrows is merely going through the limited motions allowed by his mental and physical bariatrics and ambition.

  10. The Peanut Monster on September 2nd, 2012 at 14:15

    Interesting to see the GOP go the other way – pushing for a Constitutional amendment to define marriage as one man, one woman – on the exact same say the first reading went through… which democracy is the more advanced…?

  11. Hugh on September 3rd, 2012 at 09:12

    @Peanut: Let’s try not to turn this into a smug nationalistic competition of “we have marriage equality, ergo we’re more advanced than you”.

  12. The Peanut Monster on September 3rd, 2012 at 09:22

    Fair call – what is an advanced democracy anyway, right?

    The US system would never allow such an amendment of course, because the Constitution makes amendment so difficult. In that sense, the US is far more mature – as we know, we don’t even have a written constitution.

    I’m talking here about its willingness and flexibility to be socially progressive at the political level. It’s one thing to espouse or promote progressive values, its another to adopt them politically.

  13. Graeme Edgeler on September 3rd, 2012 at 09:56

    “A marriage licence shall authorise but not oblige any marriage celebrant to solemnise the marriage to which it relates.”

    A celebrant can refuse. And who in their right mind would want to try to force an unwilling celebrant?

    The concern isn’t so much forcing someone to perform marriages they don’t want to, as ‘punishing’ those who won’t.

    A couple wishes to marry, they call up a celebrant who advises couple she will not officiate an same-sex/equality marriage (see how stupid that sounds!).

    Couple feels like they’re being treated like second-class citizens. Couple complains. Human Rights Review Tribunal agrees, orders damages.

    There is strong legal basis for concluding that Marriage Celebrants are public officials/performing a public function when solemnising marriages. There is also a strong legal basis for the proposition that when exercising general powers, public officials must do so consistently with human rights: e.g. when exercising general powers under the Trespass Act, the Speaker must consider protesters’ rights to freedom of expression and assembly. This would apply by analogy to the section you quote: a marriage celebrant has the power to refuse to officiate at any wedding, but if that refusal is discriminatory (e.g. a mixed race, or same sex, couple) that refusal will be unlawful.

  14. Lew on September 3rd, 2012 at 10:01

    “advises couple she will not officiate an same-sex/equality marriage (see how stupid that sounds!)”

    I don’t see anyone using “equality marriage” in that noun form, so you could say it sounds stupid because you’ve phrased it stupidly. What’s wrong with plain language, like “she will not officiate a marriage of two men (or women)”?

    L

  15. Graeme Edgeler on September 3rd, 2012 at 10:29

    What’s wrong with plain language, like “she will not officiate a marriage of two men (or women)”?

    I wanted to write it simply, in a way it might actually be said (and then reported to have been said), but which covered off couples where both are male and where both are female. “I don’t officiate same-sex marriages” sounds like something that might be said in such circumstances.

  16. Lew on September 3rd, 2012 at 15:04

    Yeah, I have no beef with “same-sex” or “gay” marriage in everyday usage, but campaign framing is different.

    L

  17. Hugh on September 3rd, 2012 at 23:34

    @Peanut: It’s quite arguable that a written constitution is a sign of “maturity”.

  18. helenalex on September 4th, 2012 at 15:59

    Graeme: I know what you mean about movements renaming themselves or their goals, but I also think it’s only an actual problem if it’s dishonest or misleading. The goal of this movement is for same sex couples to have marriage rights equal to those of opposite sex couples. Hence ‘marriage equality’. I really can’t see the problem.

  19. […] well was frame the issue in a positive way that most people could understand and identify with (and this post by Lew Stoddart is a must-read on the framing of the campaign messages). The fact that so many […]

  20. […] of the Marriage (Definition of Marriage) Amendment Bill, passing it into law. The strategy I wrote about after the first reading has been spectacularly successful, and marriage equality will be a reality […]

Leave a Reply

Name: (required)
Email: (required) (will not be published)
Website:
Comment: