Some say that reality TV is a stained-glass window on society. In the US the concept began with the show “Cops,” now in its gadzillionth year. It gave rise to the Survivor and Amazing Race series, singing and dancing shows, celebrity this and that, cookingÂ disasters of various sorts, adventure and survival programs,Â motorcycle and automobile customizers, the antics of sexual deviants, cheaters andÂ lumpenproletiarians of various ethnicities (e.g. “Jersey Shore”), BridezillasÂ and vapid HousewivesÂ from variousÂ places, dumb and dumber idiots doing an assortment of Darwin Award misadventures, animal attacks,Â plusÂ a varietyÂ other examinations of the detritus of US life. However, the recent turn in reality programming offers a dark reflection of the economic malaise gripping the country.
In recent months the reality concept has focused on the impact of economicÂ misery, albeit from a tangental angle. The most popular shows, led by those on aÂ channel called “True TV–not reality, but actuality”–are those that cover the flow-on effects of econonic hardship. These are led by several shows about vehicle repossession agents, but also include shows dedicated to pawn shops, gun dealers, auctioneers, hoarders and down on their luck gold prospectors. The television angle is not on the economic condition of the participants but on the behavioural effects produced by the consequences of personal economic misfortune: fights, tears, breakdowns and other human drama. Like watching train wrecks, these shows cater to morbid interest and pervese delight in other’s misfortune, which may sayÂ something about the state of US social cohesion. I confess to finding some of those involved strangely fascinating, and there is some dark humor involved, but my overall sense is that these shows are a bit too close to the truth to be entirely easy to watch.Â
I am not sure what to make of all this, but it could do conservative US policy makers some good to watch these shows, simply for them to see, should they wish to, the human face of the negative impact of the feral economic policies of the last decade.
NB: I am winding up myÂ tour in the US this week, and other than one mention of the US-Russia game have seen and heard zero in the US media Â about the RWC. What I did read is thatWayne Mapp said thatÂ the SAS was “sort of” involved in the latest terrorism incident in Kabul. Note to “Dr.” Mapp: that is Â like being “sort of” pregnant.
Otherwise, and in spite of the RWC, it will be great to be home.