safe place to buy clomid online comprar viagra online no brasil bad breaths in men using viagra like where do we viagra chocolate in bangalore abreva inactive ingredients in metformin use of viagra by age doxycycline monohydrate hyclate legit site to order cialis australia propecia cost metformin cost with insurance prednisone treatment in prostate cancer steroids nolvadex buy can you still get tan accutane reviews cytotec in pregnancy price of cialis at kroger interferon beta 1a generic cialis online apotheke deutschland cialis information amoxil generic name cialis online sources precio de cialis 5 mg en farmacias buy zithromax norx weebly does propecia work in owmen buy real propecia online metformin 500 mg 48 93 logo de cialis over the counter how much does propecia cost in the uk viagra in london patent generic viagra take clomid if no period main distributors of viagra in pakistan dolac 25 mg zoloft propecia 1 mg for sale buy viagra new orleans viagra trade name and generic name do they sell generic viagra at walgreens buy sildenafil onli buy lasix australia glucophage generico wrestler cialis 20 mg etkileri doxycycline cause vertigo cialis super active 20mg pills cheapest pills best natural viagra ukrainian viagra generico foros prices cialis 20mg sildenafil citrate brand names in india adhd specialists in west palm beach fl price of roaccutane in australia does cialis cause rash cost of viagra in rupees ciproflaxacin dosage for uti in philippines order viagra medicine how to get your dr to prescribe clomid cialis patent expiration date us taking 1500 mg metformin hcl er at bedtime best and cheap cialis donde puedo comprar cytotec tijuana se necesita receta para comprar viagra en farmacia can you buy zithromax in malaysia inderal la 80 mg generic buy zithromax whartisthebestin viagra priced right hiderax 25 mg zoloft how viagra pills looks like how much is 5mg cialis in australia metformin for weight loss cialis 14 cpr riv 5 mg prezzo prednisone uses in ms prednisone usage priligy usa trials bike generic cialis from india reviews on garcinia safe dose prednisolone cable cipro 14 2500 14 gauge in wall finasteride cause depression buy clomid without prescription in the uk dapoxetine india review worksheet viagra ohne rezept bankeinzug curta metragem brasileiro viagra online dorflex e seus genericos do viagra buy propecia aus algix 90 mg controindicazioni cialis generic viagra brasilien propecia availability in india prednisolone teva 20 mg posologie augmentin zovirax herpes nasale 3 mg cialis buy tadalafil online 35008 buy price of ciprodex otic dose of finasteride in bph buy tadalafil canada cheap 100mg generic viagra quanto custa o cialis generico 1mg vs 5mg propecia zovirax vs valtrex for cold sores can you drink on propranolol 80 mg what happens if you put viagra in someones drink remedio montclair 10 mg prednisone cheap viagra search cialis review by older people what time of day is best to take clomid farmacia online cialis generico mexico c doxycycline for use in eyes for dry eye buying viagra online is legal can i take viagra with ramipril viagra dose timing buy clomid post cycle therapy products wean off 60 mg prednisone for 10 how long can you safely take clomid order clomid today recive it tomorrow cheap viagra far east how to order tadalafil online tadora 20 tadalafil tablets for sale buying doxycycline for pets lowest price pharmacy for viagra viagra canadian healthcare where can i get viagra in auckland is zoloft a generic para que sirve el prednisone de 20 mg things that counteract cialis any harm in taking 40 mg cialis indian company who made nolvadex and price clomid 75mg success stories average price of viagra per pill prednisolone eye drops online do pharmacies in south africa stock nolvadex prednisolone 5 mg shortage of eggs ciprofloxacin and delirium in elderly buy brand clomid aventis propecia pain in breast generico do cialis na ultrafarma brasil prednisolone 50 mg tablet metformin er safe during pregnancy what is the dosage for lasix cialis in pharmacy uk success rate of 25 mg of clomid buy lasix canada most secure is viagra safe for post stroke victims how to prepare viagra at home in tamil compare cost of cialis costco walmart amoxil chemist warehouse fake viagra reviews viagra legal in india donde puedo comprar sildenafil en lima comprar remedio propecia clomid safe for baby usage du cytotec erektionsprobleme psychisch viagra generic doxycycline hyclate buy online using savingd account viagra alternatives usa russkie pesni viagra generic cytotec over the counter rite aid doxycycline dosage for pediatrics doxycycline trihydrate 750 mg 25 mg propecia daily tadalafil 20mg x 10 tabletten where i can get viagra in mumbai buy lasix solution doxycycline cost asda direct minoxidil and finasteride together cialis 5mg online uk puedo comprar cytotec en guatemala closest thing to viagra in uk buy viagra online paying with paypal zovirax whartisthebestin price buying cialis thailand does doxycycline helps in treating body odor buy viagra online 100mg seroquel inderal 40 mg astrazeneca share where can i buy clomid uk cialis 10 mg propiedades risk of multiples with clomid appartamenti in vendita roma via cipro viagra in perth wa prednisone 20 mg effects secondaires du acquistare cialis in svizzera francese buy viagra christchurch vimax sildenafil 100mg human doxycycline dose cheap viagra made in usa ampicillin crystals in urinary sediment success rate 150 mg clomid finasteride yes or no finasteride in india is .5 mg of propecia a day effective type web order viagra is online viagra fake where to get viagra in riyadh effects of prednisone in women trimipramine tropfen 40 mg dosierung ciprofloxacin can i get propecia in bangladesh hunter boots buy online uk viagra lasix 25 mg deutsche beschreibung viagra in chennai prices buy doxycycline hyclate powder retina specialist in rockwall texas 40 mg prednisone insomnia generico cialis italia is there a generic name for prednisone can you buy cialis over the counter in malaysia hotel brand of propranolol socialist vote in 1912 dose range lasix can viagra cause strokes dapoxetine brands in pakistan new season bird biotic doxycycline safe humans amc metformin safe for pregnant women metformin dosage in the elderly what is the main ingrediant in viagra viagra sale perth pharmacies that have generic cialis cipro cost canada cialis phosphodiesterase inhibitor glucophage price uk rare how to ship cialis to philippines from canada valiquid wirkstoff sildenafil cytotec in slovenia generika dapoxetine india finasteride india results telangana nolvadex hereisthebestin without prescription indicaciones para usar cytotec there going generic viagra zithromax unsafe prices of viagra in toronto reliable viagra reviews cheap doxycycline online para que enfermedades se usa el ciprofloxacino prednisolone tabletten kaufen haus diflucan price buy real viagra online pharmacy donde comprar viagra en iquique nyal vs zovirax are generic viagra safe how to take doxycycline monohydrate 100mg cheap prednisone 5mg viagra through paypal is viagra over the counter in mercury drug philippines all kind of viagra prices buy viagra enlarge doxycycline combination in mankind viagra per donne in menopausa finasteride 5mg tablets walmart viagra pesni online viagra for women in pune does clomid cause thyroid cancer finasteride 5 mg prostate normal mg for viagra can i take progesterone with clomid metformin 500 mg e generic cialis plus canada pharmacy no prescription propecia como comprar viagra en uruguay viagra store in faridabad prednisone 6 day pack canada what does viagra do in hindi can i take xanax with cialis generic for glyburide metformin off label use for finasteride oral liquid prednisone diflucan price uk rare buy generic viagra sildenafil buy single viagra pills uk national lottery roaccutane isotretinoin price il prezzo del viagra generico metformin axcount 1000 mg preisvergleich can u buy cialis propecia vs. generic what is the safe dosage of lasix viagra 50 mg tablet sample silagra brand name viagra cum with us com is it safe to take benadryl and prednisone together can you get viagra on pbs legal buy zithromax online buy viagra 100 acetylsalicylzuur apotex cardio 80 mg bijsluiter viagra buy nolvadex steroid does amoxil cause fatigue purchase brand viagra online usa viagra online reviews safe take clomid if pregnant buy buying viagra online from canada alloy wheel repair specialist reviews viagra 100 street price cialis availability uk ketian 25 mg of zoloft metformin online australia can you buy viagra from mexico do have have prescription buy viagra how long before sex should i take viagra pill human plant viagra details in time clomid 100mg success 2011 cialis 10 mg gde kupiti metformin therapy in polycystic ovary syndrome tadalafil 40 mg asap viagra 100 mg prezzo farmacia extracto de semilla de uva donde comprar viagra use of viagra in older men cipro 500 mg twice day 10 days buying cialis safely online cialis generika mit paypal kaufen propecia 28 tablets price in maylasia how long to take clomid before iui can you take 4 5g cialis in place of 1 20g cialis best place to buy real viagra cialis price in jakarta can viagra cause urinary retention cialis 20 mg prijs cheapest country to get cialis viagra sale durban prednisone over the counter 150 mg viagra dosing viagra gives mutiple erection in four hours private fertility treatment clomid priligy como usar twitter zofran and inderal manual para usar el cytotec viagra in uae yahoo answer clomid treatment duration amaryl nombre generico de amoxil ampicillin in lactation buy zovirax ointment line will viagra keep you hard when masterbating accutane price in malaysia sony buy viagra online united ste viagra sale in chennai store effet indesirable clomid 50mg sildenafil citrate tab 20mg where can i buy zithromax azithromycin buy viagra in tallin remedio toragesic generico do viagra buy nolvadex research pharmaceuticals ciprofloxacin 500 mg appearance viagra online uk cheapest loans cialis is 2.5 mg review how strong is 100mg viagra esopral 40 mg bivirkninger av zoloft clomid twins 150 mg buy viagra in nairobi viagra order paypal propecia boots in ireland why isnt viagra generic what cold medicine is safe with zoloft zoloft for anxiety in teens online prescriptions viagra india buy liquid clomid nolvadex buy diflucan medication iui with clomid ciprofloxacin hcl 500 mg for pneumonia acquistare cialis generico online stopwatch cost of inderal without insurance viagra tablet names zithromax liquid concentration problems viagra unprescribed paypal accepted ampicillin brand names in the philippines cheap dapoxetine baownbeuv is there a tadalafil generic cialis tadalafil 20 mg tab puscifer v is for viagra tracks usa tabs.org cialis 20mg free shipping europe viagra 100 mg pfizer over the counter drug like clomid ovulation efectos secundarios de usar cialis where to buy zovirax in south africa. what is the generic for cialis vibramycin dergboadre price cialis 20 mg ou viagra viagra in wall taking 20 mg cialis daily a safe viagra alternative medicamento doxycycline 100mg where can i buy nolvadex for pct in pretoria zoloft 50 mg sertraline para que sirve la pastilla ciprofloxacino de 500 mg amoxil brand names cialis 10 mg filmtabletta 4x is generic cialis ok where to buy priligy in nigeria the outside wife better erections with liquid viagra ciproxin 500 mg effetti collaterali sildenafil dose in newborn what dosage of viagra to take priligy como usar snapchat doxycycline hyclate 100 mg knee pain can you get botox on accutane clomid doses for pcos buy chinese clomid cefaclor 750mg generico de cialis how long do antibiotics doxycycline stay in your system can buy viagra asda viagra in the waters what happen if a girl take viagra order viagra online canada mastercard customer diflucan 150 mg 2 cps order viagra from uk is it safe to masturbate when taking finasteride tabs domcolic 10 mg prednisone medco prior authorization form cialis over the counter cialis in bulgaria prescription fabletics positive reviews of zoloft viagra sale hong kong 30 mg day accutane singapore generic viagra where to buy finasteride cheap cialis 5 mg tabs vs 20mg zithromax liquid cat viagra 100 price sams club can you buy nolvadex from uk como tomar ranitidina de 150 mg zoloft how long after accutane can i use retin a zovirax 800 mg herpes on lip generic clomid pct side cipro 500 mg treats truck prednisolone 20 mg posologie arnica buy viagra on door can u buy viagra in bergen norway folcres vs propecia reviews where is the best place to buy viagra in ireland doxycycline blood in stool cost of 500 100mg doxycycline hyclate vega sildenafil citrate pills natural alternative to clomid uk what is ciproxina 500 mg for metformin 250 mg sr buy viagra jet cialis 60 mg for sale in the us overnight fluomizin 10 mg rezeptfrei viagra finasteride pausa can u cut cialis fir daily use in half celebra 200 mg generico do viagra glucophage 500 mg nebenwirkungen cialis canada price daily use shoppers drug mart time taken for viagra to work is 60 mg fluoxetine a high dose prednisone undigested metformin in feces smearing can you take coq10 with clomid powerful viagra pills cheap buying cialis 800mg online is it safe zoloft bloody nose finasteride mechanism of action what is the main ingredient in metformin does clomid work first time where can i buy doxycycline for acne reviews of cialis professional viagra over the counter in europe clip 500 mg metformin use of finasteride in men over 65 metformin 500 mg tab aur cialis tadalafil 20mg reviews real viagra sale online where can i buy viagra plus in malaysia propecia and trying to get pregnant doxycycline safe ba para sa may chlamydia o generico do viagra faz mal generic cialis paypal uk new balance 1690 womens reviews on viagra metanabol 10 mg prednisone prednisone 10mg dose pack wikipedia generic cialis viagra in indian medical stores zambia viagra in hollywood fl can i crossed a half cialis 20 mg what effects clomid 200 mg daily viagra best time to use is there a generic for doxycycline monohydrate cytotec pastillas costo mexico prednisone dosage in pinched nerve for a dog is generic viagra efective cost viagra tijuana cialis 25 mg fiyat pipamperon 40 mg bijsluiter nolvadex cianoacrilato donde comprar viagra viagra causas can i take viagra with antidepressants where to puy viagra in poland reputable place buy viagra metformin ct 1000 mg filmtabletten get cialis samples finasteride generis 1 mg ciproxin indications in urdu comprar viagra embalagem discreta generico del viagra dr simi provera and clomid buy online in uk prednisolone salbe ohne rezept kaufen como se deben usar las pastillas cytotec propecia pricing walmart where to buy priligy in penang cialis at riteaid price propecia and biotin in effect can doxycycline hyclate treat a yeast infection canadian pharmacy otc viagra is allegra safe to take with zoloft is it safe to take ampicillin while pregnant viagra supplier review sildenafil 110 mg troche dose of doxycycline for sinus infection zoloft hydrochloride 50 mg cialis prostate disorders can clomid cause blighted ovum cytotec medicine price in pakistan iphone pay for viagra with paypal tadalafil sales in brazil nolvadex 10 mg 30 tabs Kiwipolitico » Blog Archive » On Conceptual Transfer versus Conceptual Stretching in Argumentation.

On Conceptual Transfer versus Conceptual Stretching in Argumentation.

datePosted on 18:08, May 11th, 2009 by Pablo

Although I have enjoyed participating in this weblog collective, I was unprepared to deal with the inability of many commentators to construct a proper argument in the debates about posts. By “inability to construct a proper argument” I do not mean those that  resort to ad hominems and vulgarity (whom we have thankfully excised via moderation). Nor do I refer to those who substitute opinion for fact and make statements or claims on subjects that they clearly know little about.  Instead, I am referring to those otherwise thoughtful commentators who misuse concepts and terms when making their arguments. I refer not to those who deliberately do so to be polemical or provocative, but to those who inadvertently do so. The main problem for the latter is the inability to distinguish between conceptual transfer and conceptual stretching.

Conceptual transfer refers to the process by which a concept or term is taken from its original context and applied to a new situation without appreciable loss of definition or meaning. Conceptual stretching refers to  the distortion of the original concept in order to apply it to a different situation or context. The first is a legitimate argumentative exercise; the second is intellectually dishonest or (most often) lazy.

Let me offer some examples. “Socialism” is a 19th century concept that refers to an economy in which the direct producers of wealth in a society appropriate the common surplus generated by their labours and distribute it according to egalitarian principles rooted in commonly accepted notions of need. Decisions on distribution take into account the need to reproduce the economic form via savings and reinvestment, so current individual allocations are balanced against the common interest in future allocations. This concept can be taken out of its 19th century context and applied, without loss of definition, to 1970s Israeli Kibbutzim, Spanish agricultural cooperatives in the 1990s or post 2002 Argentine worker-owned factories. In all of these instances, the concept was transfered to the new situation without distorting its initial meaning; in each instance workers make democratic allocation decisions about the surpluses they generate. On the other hand, calling the Obama administration’s fiscal stimulus package or progressive tax policy “socialist,” or referring to Labour’s macreconomic policies as “socialism,” betrays either profound ignorance of the concept or bad intent on the part of those who make such claims. In the latter cases, the concept has been so badly stretched so has to render it meaningless other than as some type of pejorative.

Take another example: “fascism.” Fascism was a particular inter-war political phenomena. It emerged in response to the Great Depression among the so-called “weak links” of the imperialist chain, former great powers or empires that were being eclipsed by emerging powers. Fascism was characterised by an industrial state capitalist economic project directed by a one party mobilizational authoritarian regime dominated by a charismatic leadership that used inclusionary state corporatist vehicles for mass participation in grand nationalist projects that included the military reassertion of empire. In all cases fascism was a “passive revolution” in that it sought to stave off perceived Marxist-Leninist advances in the countries in which it emerged. European fascism had three variants: Austro-Germanic, in which the core constituency of the national socialist regimes was the lower bourgeoisie; the Italian version, in which the core constituency was the urban working class (Mussolini’s black shirts); and the Spanish version, which grouped monarchists, the agrarian oligarchy and rural peasantry against the urban middle and working classes. In the first two variants, efforts to re-assert their imperial status ended in military defeat. In the Spanish version, the self-recognized inability to re-assert imperial dominance allowed the Franco regime to survive until 1972. As for the Japanese, their version of fascism was an amalgam that had the most cross-class bases of support for monarchism, militarism and imperialism, but without the party mobilizational apparatus used by the European variants.

The point of this extended discussion of the concept of “fascism” is that it was a political form specific to a particular historical moment in the early 20th century, one that can not be replicated simply because the material and political conditions of existence are no longer those that gave it life. The closest parallel to fascism–Latin American populism of the 1940s and 1950s–emulated some but not all of the political features of European fascism and did not have the same economic base. All other recent forms of authoritarianism evidence differences far to great to even remotely call them “fascist.” And yet people do, repeatedly. General Pincohet’s regime in Chile was and is still said to be “fascist” even though his political project was demobilizational and his economic project neoliberal. Commodore Frank Bainarama is called a fascist because he led a coup and rules by fiat in Fiji. Mugabe is a fascist because, well, he is.  What is true is that all of these individuals were and are authoritarians, as are many others, civilian and military alike. But that does not make them “fascist.” To label them as such is to undercut any argument for their removal.

In extending the term “fascist” to other forms of authoritarianism that do not share its structural or political features, the term has been stretched to the point of insignificance. It is now just an insult without intellectual justification. It is, in other words, argumentatively useless.

There are plenty of other concepts that come to mind when the issue of conceptual stretching arises. “Hegemony” and “imperialist” are oft-abused, stretched and distorted concepts. “Nazi” (as in German national socialist) is another popularly distorted term. The list is long, and it appears all to often in the writing/commentary on this blog. I would simply ask that people do their conceptual stretching elsewhere–DPF’s blog is a good start.

Even astute writers can fall prey to conceptual stretching. In his otherwise insightful post on Agenda Setting below, my colleague Lew refers to the likelihood of “a more militaristic, less community-based approaching to policing–in international relations terms, a more strongly realist law enforcement posture” in the aftermath of the Napier shootings and siege. The trouble with his invocation of realism is two-fold: as an international relations theory, realism maintains that the international environment is a Hobbesian state of nature in which anarchy abounds. Absent a Leviathan such as those that exist within nation-states, international actors seek to accumulate and use power in order to a) achieve security and b) pursue national interests. Power in such a view is not simply military might, but includes economic resources, diplomatic influence, moral or ethical leadership–the particular mix of what goes into the notion of “power” is complex and variable, as well as contingent on the objectives being pursued or defended. Power is not exclusively “militaristic” nor is it necessarily anti-community–the formation of alliances and use of supranational organisations for conflict resolution is part and parcel of the realist approach.

Lew’s use of realism to describe a likely police response is doubly flawed because it has been stretched to describe a particularly military approach to law enforcement within a liberal democracy. In other words, both the context and the approach are completely different to those in which realism is applied to international relations.

This is not meant to cast aspersions on Lew. To the contrary, I admire his work and appreciate his insights. Instead, this post is an attempt to point out this very common argumentative flaw among otherwise thoughtful readers and commentators, so that we can avoid repeating them in future debates. In the mean time I shall ponder whether to write about another pet peeve: the inability of people to establish a “chain of causality” between independent, intervening and dependent variables when making their case.

14 Responses to “On Conceptual Transfer versus Conceptual Stretching in Argumentation.”

  1. Lew on May 11th, 2009 at 22:34

    Pablo,

    I found myself agreeing entirely with your post and mentally castigating those who misuse concepts in such ways, only to find that I was the example! Nevertheless, thank you. I’m a bit of a terminology Nazi (heh), but one who tries to live up to the standards I expect of others, so I’m not averse to reflection or critique.

    I think this sort of thing is a kind of autodidact’s blind spot, which is to say that people with an imperfect or ad-hoc understanding of a term tend to misuse it without realising that that’s what they’re doing; and indeed with the idea that the stretch doesn’t matter so much as the sense or intent behind the usage, which readers are expected to infer. As you’ve observed on a couple of occasions, international relations isn’t my academic bag – I studied a bit at undergraduate level, but largely I’m self-(mis)taught as an adjunct to my work in symbolic politics (in the case above an earlier draft had included weasel words to the effect that I wasn’t really comparing apples and apples, but I removed them thinking the post was already too verbose).

    So it is with most people, who misuse terminology they’ve acquired from an amateur interest in, e.g., politics or sociology or economics because they don’t really know how it can and can’t be used legitimately. Largely we get this from the fact that most of our information comes not from academia, or quality reference material, but from a media system staffed entirely by generalists, jacks-of-all-trades, self-taught pseudo-experts on everything who filter as best they can the complexities of such matters into simple predigested goo for folk to consume.

    What’s the cure, though? Should people refrain from using terminology they don’t fully and completely understand? Absent sufficient knowledge of a field, how does one ascertain which uses are correct and which are stretched beyond usefulness? Does including weasel words along the lines of `I know I’m misusing the term, just roll with me here’ serve any sort of purpose?

    L

  2. Pablo on May 11th, 2009 at 22:48

    Thanks Lew: As you know I value your thought. I certainly do not want to stifle debate because of the misuse of certain commonly abused/distorted/stretched concepts and terms, although that is what I am reacting to. A simple qualifier before using a “loaded” term is all that is needed. Of course, if you need to use the qualifier you are probably being polemical, not argumentative.

  3. Quoth the Raven on May 12th, 2009 at 12:40

    The use of the term socialism is one of my pet bugs. Right wingers seem to equate socialism with state-socialism, leaving out an entire broad strand of socialist thought. It’s the likes of Proudhon and Tucker that the right wingers aren’t often aware of. As I’ve said before I prefer not to use the word socialist because looking at its history through the 19th century it is incredibly hard to define.
    Another one that annoys me and you may disagree with me here is capitalism. Probably the right winers would accuse me of equating capitalism with state-captialism, but from my own reading of history I think the meaning I ascribe to it is accurate that would be somewhere between the second two meanings listed here.
    I think though that these words have a long and confusing history and it’s largely silly to get too wound up about how people use them. These words have always been used fairly loosely.
    There is a heck of a lot of back and fourth on this at left-libertarian/anarchist blogs, see this for example: Socialist Definitional Free-for-All: Part I. These are all very intelligent people who know what they’re talking about.

  4. Quoth the Raven on May 12th, 2009 at 20:59

    Here’s a bit of humour with political definitions:
    Some Fun with Definitions.

  5. SPC on May 12th, 2009 at 21:03

    The thing about some terminology is that as Quoth the Raven noted those who view the “terms” (such as socialist) in a positive light actually care enough to debate about it.

    It is possibly from this, we can move onto the term “politically correct” for the agreed use of the term.

    Of course some, such as on Kiwiblog, delight in their political incorrectness, such as calling Greens watermelons – which is just going too far and being provocative.

  6. Lew on May 12th, 2009 at 21:12

    I’d argue that terms such as `politically correct’, `common sense’, `wise use’ which contain an implicit judgement have never had very much real meaning to begin with, having always been defined and employed to mean whatever their user wanted them to mean in the given usage. This is critical to political communication – define the lexicon and you define the discourse.

    Terms such as those used as examples by Pablo and QtR – socialist, realist, fascist, capitalist – actually have meaning outside of their polemic usage, even if they have become symbolically so loaded as to now be almost impossible to use with a straight face.

    L

  7. Quoth the Raven on May 12th, 2009 at 23:44

    A lot of this also fits into one’s wider ideology. A Marxist will define capitalism in a certain way a Randian another and someone from my political perspective another. Or like a Leninist will look at imperialism in such and such a way. A lot of political arguments seem to devolve into semantics. I mean there can be argument over the concept of ideology. You have to tolerate disagreement and not be shouting impure! impure! and try to hold a front of intellectual superiority to people who simply hold a different view. Sooner or later you just look ludicrous. If that all makes sense?

  8. Lew on May 13th, 2009 at 00:11

    QtR,

    You imply that all readings of a term are equal. I’m not sure I accept that – generally there exist accepted definitions which are rooted in historical or philosophical usage and should transcend polemic usage to a large extent. Shouldn’t a person who is sufficiently familiar with a topic be able to employ a term’s original or core meaning without having to use it as an ideological springboard at every turn?

    L

  9. Quoth the Raven on May 13th, 2009 at 00:23

    I don’t wish to imply that. That should be clear from my first comment. It’s like if I’m arguing with someone about what capitalism means and they think it means a free market and I wish for a free market then is there any point arguing about what capitalism means? (Okay well there is some) – We should be arguing about the implications of a free market.
    Do you remember that argument we had about marxism? I can get very hung up about these sort of things, but I think it’s important, like I said, not to get too hung up.

  10. Lew on May 13th, 2009 at 00:34

    QtR,

    if I’m arguing with someone about what capitalism means and they think it means a free market and I wish for a free market then is there any point arguing about what capitalism means? (Okay well there is some)

    This would suggest to me that one or both the arguers had a poor understanding of `capitalism’ or was using the term with a view to score ideological points rather than trying genuinely to agree on a definition of the term. A lot of the time when people say `capitalism’ they include a bunch of things which necessarily derive from or accompany capitalism the pure concept, and the confusion comes when two people include differing things in the bunch, which then become difficult to reconcile. My point in the comment above is that even the iconic capitalist and the iconic communist can agree, if they’re honest, on what the term `capitalism’ means in a pure sense – the disagreement comes when they try to discuss the implications of that meaning.

    Do you remember that argument we had about marxism?

    I seem to recall it being about communism (an implementation), not about Marxism (a theory). But yes, and I was trying to make an ideological point about it – not trying to define the issue dispassionately, but trying to argue my evaluation of its worth. That’s useful as well, but it’s a different category of argument.

    L

  11. Quoth the Raven on May 13th, 2009 at 11:09

    Some do think capitalism means a free market. So “pure” capitalism is something which we have yet to attain. Equating a free market with capitalism is a twentieth century redefinition and as I’ve already said multiple times wrong. To me free market capitalism is a contradiction in terms. Someone who uses capitalism in that sense is obviously going to have a wildly different conception of what a free market may look like or what free market policies are than someone, who uses capitalism correctly.
    On the issue of Marxism, not to bring it back up, but I thought it was an example of what Pablo is describing here. That is you were trying to conflate the Khmer Rouge with Marxism.

  12. Lew on May 13th, 2009 at 11:33

    QtR,

    Some do think capitalism means a free market. So “pure” capitalism is something which we have yet to attain.

    I mean `pure’ in definition, not in implementation. Waht I’m talking about is not a system as it operates but a concept in discourse. `Pure’ as opposed to `loaded’, though I accept that’s a poor dichotomy.

    On the issue of Marxism, not to bring it back up, but I thought it was an example of what Pablo is describing here. That is you were trying to conflate the Khmer Rouge with Marxism.

    I don’t want to relitigate either, but you’ve misunderstood the distinction between implementation and theory again. I noted that the worst excesses of socialism (KR, Stalinism, Maoism) as political implementations derived from the power transfer problem in Marxism (how to get the dictatorship representing the proletariat to relinquish their power?). That makes me disinclined to trust Marxism as the basis for a political/economic system in implementation. Nothing against the theory as a means of making sense of political and economic systems and the distribution of power in a society.

    L

  13. Quoth the Raven on May 13th, 2009 at 12:03

    I get your point – now. That’s exactly the reason why Anarchists of the time rejected Marxism and I said in that thread Marxism is not good in practice and its not good in theory. I think you’ve made it clear now and I don’t disagree with you.
    Even so Marx had little to say about what a dicatatorship of the proletariat would look like and you can get a better reading of Marx if you remember that Engels said of the Paris Commune “that is the dictatorship of the proletariat”. And it’s said that Engels was more authoritarian then Marx so to me it’s clear that there is a problem of power transfer and getting rid of that power but we can infer that Marx’s conception of the dictatorship of the proletariat would have been quite left in nature.

  14. Pablo on May 13th, 2009 at 12:38

    Social phenomena are grounded in the material conditions of existence. Thus, they have discernible features, traits and characteristics, the combination of which makes them “observable.” These observable characteristics are “objective” in the sense that they are material and given. It is these objective traits that comprise the “concept” of the phenomenon being observed. Thus, for example, the “concept” of a political regime will necessarily include specific institutions, rules, mores and incumbents of political decision-making positions, as well as the relationship between them. This concept of regime differentiates it from “government,” which merely refers to current office-holders (or power-wielders) as opposed to the underpinning latticework upon which government authority is vested.
    Thus using the word “regime” when one is talking about the government of the day is an example of conceptual stretching (or vice versa).

    Of course, subjective assessments of objective phenomena will vary according to the vantage point of the observer (the blind men touching an elephant analogy is oft used to illustrate this point). But the two things are entirely different. One is a materially bounded (social) given; the other is an interpretation of what it is, how it came to be, its suitability, desirability, efficiency etc. It is in the confusion of the subjective and objective elements of social phenomena that much post-modern analysis is flawed, because it is premised on a stretch too far–the primacy of the interpretation (the social “construct”) over the objective features (the social “concept’) of a given phenomenon.

    There are terms that are less “objective” than what is described above, and which therefore can quite legitimately be the subject of different interpretations. Take, for example, the concept of “hegemony.” Originally formulated to describe ideological leadership leading to rule by consent within one nation-state (in contradistinction to Lenin’s notion of political domination), the term has been warped by Western international relations theorists to mean the domination of one state actor over others due to superiority in (economic, military, diplomatic) power variables–e.g., the US was the international “hegemon” in the 1990s. In doing so the IR theorists took the concept right back to Lenin (Marxism’s first IR theorist) by returning to domination as the basis for hegemony, rather than consent. But since the concept of “hegemony” is an interpretation in the first place, it is more malleable.

    As for terms like “Marxism” that cover an array of economic and political combinations, with some emphasizing the structural aspects and others emphasizing the superstructural aspects of a specific meshing of collective ownership and worker’s rule–that is a label, not a concept. It is meaningless for argumentative purposes.

    My post is focused not so much on varying interpretations of widely used concepts, but on the distortion of concepts that describe, define or refer to “objective” social phenomena such as regime types or economic models.

Leave a Reply

Name: (required)
Email: (required) (will not be published)
Website:
Comment: