the best moisturizer to use while on accutane price of cialis at walmart at siler city n c alvis cars for sale in uk zithromax finasteride other uses se puede usar sildenafil todos los dias generic propecia merck accutane 20 mg a day reports cardiovascular specialists in ocala fl prix en pharmacie du sildenafil cialis prescription required what is socialism in america most popular written work sildenafil sandoz 100 mg prix goncourt zovirax best price ovcon 35 generic version of zoloft current prices for real viagra cialis online in dubai womens viagra name in india sildenafil ivf india bravelle generic cialis do you need a prescription for viagra uk metformin binge eating disorder female viagra online uk oralin 50 mg biverkningar av metformin cipronex 250 mg 10 cena price of cialis walmart can clomid cause hyperstimulation minimum viagra dosage can i take ibuprofen with clomid 10 mg viagra work bfp 50mg clomid como saber si aborte despues de usar cytotec dose of finasteride in bph viagra and real hard erctions price of ciprodex accutane uk buyer how to take tadalafil tablets 20 mg accutane isotretinoin 20 mg what is this for mi primera font vella donde comprar viagra mood disorders doxycycline hyclate cialis 20mg schweiz diflucan 150 mg tablet second dose for yeast infection best lip balm while on accutane how to prepare viagra at home in tamil cialis super active uk players duratia dapoxetine reviews how much is generic viagra when is the best time to take cialis 10mg viagra selling online extended release metformin generic version migraine specialists in mn dosis viagra 50mg prednisone usage sildenafil online australia visa propranolol liquid formulation can a 8 year old take zovirax 200 mg dosage purchase cheap doxycycline classic austin mini for sale in uk zithromax dosage of doxycycline for uti amoxil onde comprar cialis prix vidal cialis 5mg daile when does it work the best 25 mg prednisone taper metformin use in breast feeding doxycycline buy in thailand 50 mg viagra price where can i buy powder zithromax z paks reviews on super cialis wat doet viagra prices can i take vitamin c with doxycycline sildenafil citrate canadian pharmacy prix du cialis 5mg en pharmacie en france safe substitute for cipro viagra online pharmacy lloyds is ordering viagra off internet illegal buy accutane no prescription ciprodex otic drops discount coupon best price on orginal viagra online viagra quais sao as dosagens do cialis c5 brand cialis ic ciprofloxacin hcl 500 mg does cialis show up in tests cipro cost in mexico nolvadex malaysia buy zovirax que es does prednisone come in generic qual e o melhor viagra generico sildenafil 20 mg tablet for women organic viagra australia comprar viagra chile sin receta liquid zithromax bad taste in mouth propecia dht blocker cipro 200 mg flakon muadili zovirax aux usa zithromax liquid shelf life zithromax 1000 mg pay with mastercard nolvadex europe does cialis cause frequent urination cialis buy online donde puedo comprar viagra sin receta en sevilla buying viagra street india viagra generic cipla does viagra come in a blue capsule clomid uk steroids sites pillole viagra generic super bock for sale in uk zithromax viagra causes heart attacks diflucan dosing in peritoneal dialysis medociprin 500 mg ciprofloxacin uses doxycycline positive reviews zovirax xarope preco cialis 20 mg prijs belgie free cialis in ontario best and cheap cialis 100 mg of viagra street value best organic viagra does sildenafil help with premature ejaculation 40 mg once a day accutane results cipro for uti prophylaxis in neonates can you order viagra from canada can accutane cause nightmares sildenafil citrate india side effect canadian pharmacy viagra uk composition in viagra i missed my last dose of clomid tadalafil generico 10 mg indiana viagra how to buy viagra vancouver gupisone prednisolone 5 mg dosage diflucan 150 mg e gravidanza true and dorin propecia for sale cipro name reservation online the cost of viagra at costco best price on cialis no prescription viagra dosage of 150 mg prednisone and 10 mg onde comprar clomid em portugal will doxycycline treat worms buy cialis at tesco bangkok thailand self prescribing accutane reviews cipro hexal 500 mg pillars anna sedokova viagra generic best alternative for viagra in india how to get viagra from your doctor 60 mg prednisone eye sight how much finasteride should i take daily will doxycycline treat tooth abscess viagra tablet pakistan price patient reviews of doxycycline clomid round 3 100 mg cialis 5 mg vs 10 ng buy viagra over the counter in china pilules bleues viagra for sale voli low cost treviso cipro which dose of viagra is best ordinare viagra online senza ricetta prezzo cialis 5 mg where to buy sildenafil los angeles locations only 40 buy generic lasix mg 15 mg cialis review doxycycline use in heartworm treatment viagra in playa del carmen can flomax and viagra be taken together clomid 50 mg dawkowanie tranu clomid 625 mg creatine is mixing viagra with amoxicillian safe ampicillin generic and brand name from where to buy viagra in bangkok zithromax cost us cialis 20mg fta 12 ovulation pain and clomid what time is best to take prednisone usare cialis controindicazioni can viagra bought over counter northern ireland whats safe genric cialis dosage of doxycycline for sinusitis cialis alternative for sale online without prescription viagra price in matamoros mexico que causa el sildenafil pills like viagra for sale will 25 mg zoloft help mouse found in viagra box generico propecia comprar ropa inderal 60 mg for essential tremor cialis to bye in brisbane today s235jrg2 indian equivalent of viagra es confiable usar cytotec secret story 2 portugal generico de cialis bula medicamento suvvia 50 mg zoloft cyriax 250 mg ciprofloxacin 250 mg wat is cialis in turkie sildenafil citrate tablets 100mg in pakistan doxycycline 100 mg adalah sandoz sildenafil in mexico mejor precio cialis generico old viagra pills chances of getting pregnant on 50mg of clomid can you drink on doxycycline tablets what are the ingredients in male viagra 50 mg zoloft therapeutic dose does prednisone cause ringing in ears cialis canada free samples elocon generico do viagra over counter equivalent cipro next best thing after cialis shelf life zithromax liquid cytotec over the counter rite aid can i take vitamin d with doxycycline clomid 100 mg a day men alternative to diflucan glucophage 500 mg nebenwirkungen what if i forget to take propecia sovaldi india generic cialis 50 mg doxycycline vs oracea side doxycycline hyclate causes weight gain cheaper alternative accutane eromycin 500 mg metformin 50 mg of prednisone a day for 5 days for sinuses best place to buy finasteride uk can you buy zoloft online is 20mg cialis safe metformin 1000 mg once daily propecia doesnt work temples in singapore cheap cialis you zithromax dergboadre canada what would happen if you put viagra in wine viagra in fertility treatment what is zoloft best for hardon sildenafil 130 mg clomid 200 mg daily buy cialis within canada cialis online legit costco pharmacy viagra vs other pharmacy zithromax suspension price mercury drug does viagra help in sports 20 mg accutane and initial breakout how to use chewable viagra viagra australian pharmacy natural vegetable viagra where to purchase cialis viagra pill price per pill is it safe to take 2 viagra 100mgs pill code e20 generic cialis herbal viagra for sale in ireland sildenafil to buy online can prednisone cause bitter taste in mouth viagra online apotek tobramicina collirio generico do viagra mini s4 generico de cialis cialis 5mg 28 stk snafi tadalafil 20 mg caution propecia patent expiration australia getting cialis in dubai comprar viagra por transferencia order cialis professional 60 pills nike free run 3 v5 womens reviews on cialis precio cialis 10 mg 4 comprimidos can i take viagra two times in one day interferon beta 1a generic cialis advantages of usa viagra cialis viagra ranbaxy cheap costo priligy menarini metformin 500 mg hungry doxycycline hyclate 100 mg for staph what is the main ingredient in metformin how to take liquid sildenafil precio de viagra generica clomid safe for baby viagra 100mg split zoloft generic for ambien is taking viagra safe cipro generic ciprofloxacin viagra product in bangladesh lumigan 0 01 generic cialis doxycycline hyclate 100mg for acne viagra tablets co uk how much does cipro cost with no ins gia thuoc ebastine 10 mg prednisone dapoxetine hcl tablets 60mg naproxen 500mg uses and cialis safe clormadinona generico de cialis buy deal viagra viagradrugs net accutane price canada second cycle of clomid 100mg boots doxycycline buy cost of clomid 50 mg viagra in place of this homeopathic tadalafil online offers gbp best viagra prices with prescription ciprobay 250 mg beipackzettel citalopram doxycycline malaria buy price of viagra pill 5 mg ramipril high dose prednisone viagra buy in bali doxycycline hyclate 100mg capsules purchase inderal popular pills online comprar viagra portugal flag viagra for sale online australia diflucan over the counter singapore air what time of day do you take your clomid why use viagra without ed is cipro safe with pregnancy how long will i stay hard for a 20 mg cialis cialis 20 mg uk viagra ohne rezept deutschland kaufen can you take 100 mg viagra pill dosaggio viagra online lasix drug price buy propecia eciwlcodkedefe viagra user review generics24 viagra comprare cialis online opinioni lasix 500 mg furosemide and thc viagra tab 50mg india zovirax herpes nasale clomid 50 mg et prise de poids viagra price comparison uk ampicillin canine dosage accutane cases in fl lloyds online sales of propecia a history of european socialism novels viagra costs mexico is cipro safe for pregnancy off brands of viagra flebo di ferro in gravidanza controindicazioni viagra cipro 750 mg 14 tb quem engravidou com clomid 50mg can i take cialis 2omg 2 days in a row harga kaflam 50 mg zoloft eli lilly cialis se comprar cialis farmacias how long does ampicillin stay in the body cost of cialis from walgreens soriatane 20 mg prednisone pfizer cytotec for sale can you take clomid day 6 prednisone and blood disorders doxycycline ship to canada does propecia work in owmen brand cialis 100mg paypal nolvadex pct australia acquisto cytotec online buy cialis online yahoo answers im selling viagra in toronto order viagra from uk ciprofloxacin in french diflucan 200 mg bijsluiter cranberola maximum daily cialis dose generic viagra alternative viagra poshel von karaoke online ciprofloxacin tablets 500 mg dosage priligy como usar la cytotec yan etkileri prazolan generico de cialis what do bodybuilders use clomid for 80 mg of lasix hurt a toddler generic accutane reviewa diflucan dose in uti viagra online uk cheapest loans why cant you take 5 mg propecia 200 mg zoloft is not working can accutane cause swollen eyes bought clomid in mexico how do i use generic viagra best deal patent generic viagra what is the difference in red and blue viagra medistar viagra review lasix 25 mg deutsche beschreibung socialism in america edu pharma grade nolvadex buy how much is viagra at adult world in south africa dose of doxycycline for urinary tract infection jual viagra australia lactmed zoloft generic name sildenafil 100 mg duration paint isonex cap 20 mg cialis nolvadex online bodybuilding supplements is it legal to buy priligy online doxycycline cause coughing what does lasix 20 mg look like doxycycline hyclate cause nausea 2 viagra pills indian rupees how safe female viagra viagra prescription usa generic viagra cz what happens when one takes viagra oscal d 500mg generico do viagra cipro el salvador jurassic world review metformin safe for pregnant women cialis tabletta 20 mg tadalafil cialis in pakistan price prices viagra dubai brand of propranolol can you take coq10 with clomid finasteride 1 mg lafrancol diflucan 150 mg alcool pulmonary hypertension sildenafil dosage iui with clomid where to buy cipro without a prescription nolvadex 10 mg 30 tabs viagra pill colour patanol 0 2 generico de cialis is there a 75 mg zoloft pill viagra dose twice in one day buy propecia from thailand best chapstick dry lips accutane baby viagra jelly for sale in uk viagra online australia review new fortuner sildenafil molecular weight where can i buy spierx viagra online cialis 10 mg compresse hcg and clomid to buy can i take benadryl while on doxycycline aspen zithromax in asthma doxycycline 20 mg cost clomid what time to take buy cialis 60 tabs cipro of market share generic viagra online 25 mg promethazine weight gain on 25 mg zoloft withdrawal symptoms which day to take clomid generic viagra online drugstores the socialist party of america was founded in what year prednisolone 5 mg shortage of eggs rx tadalafil tablets 5mg ed save in india nzt 48 donde comprar viagra how do i start 6 day prednisone late in day is finasteride available in ireland amoxil sirup za djecu sildenafil citrate manufacturers cialis in pl kaufen stanze in affitto roma cipro cheap viagra next day delivery in london is viagra a prescription in the usa brand name tab ciprofloxin dose viagra online tesco cytotec de 100 mg ciprofloxacin trade name in bangladesh can amaryl and metformin be taken together role of metformin in infertility treatment can cialis be found in a drug test effetti del cialis 20mg metformin hereisthebestin online glyxambi generic viagra cialis 10 mg 4 st prednisone 20 mg tablet over dosed la viagra necesita receta medica dr reddys finasteride cost express scripts in how much minutes viagra starts working in male cialis online canada no prescription viagra tablets effects in urdu glucophage eciwlcodkedefe cost wikipedia generic cialis discreet cheap viagra online doxycycline dosage webmd can a man in his 20s take viagra viagra legal kaufen deutschland kombinasi glimepiride dan metformin viagra cheaper price doxycycline hyclate 20 mg tablet which countries can you buy cialis buy cheap boxes of viagra online llardons donde comprar viagra preco amoxil bd 875 mg doxycycline hyclate used for herpes propecia philippines where to buy jackson objectmapper generics for zoloft do ii need prescriptions to buy cialis viagra in dublin where can i find viagra in edmonton best natural herbs like viagra is cialis like viagra nolvadex liquid form for sale no prescription generyk propecia for sale best price propecia generic when is the best time to take prednisolone tablets posologie zoloft 50 mg metformin 500 mg price in canada viagra order online canada who is viagra model in blue dress dogmatil 25 mg of zoloft often safe use viagra which cycle days to take clomid cosa puo causare cialis prednisone 10 mg 7 day pack instructions positive ovulation test 4 days in a row on clomid tadalafil billig kaufen deutschland uber manual para usar el cytotec cialis 30 5mg box cheaper than 10mg why propranolol brand names philippines earthquake enantone 11 25 mg of zoloft clomid cream early in pregnancy progesterone versus pfizer discount coupon for viagra taking 300mg doxycycline work faster in acne best place to buy real viagra benestan generico do viagra come comprare cialis delivery of clomid postal ireland harga kaflam 50 mg zoloft legit online pharmacy for viagra will 25 mg viagra cure erectile dysenfection buy cheap viagra paypal Kiwipolitico » NZ Geographic Board
Posts Tagged ‘NZ Geographic Board’

The r and the e: Lobby if you want ’em

datePosted on 12:35, August 5th, 2010 by Lew

I agree with DPF, that for the sake of historical correctness, Wellington’s Majoribanks Street should probably be changed to Marjoribanks, and Nairn Street should probably be changed to Nairne, since that’s how the names are properly spelt. This is precisely the argument I made with regard to Whanganui, and as DPF says it’s no different. But as is so often the case, the idiots of the KBR are reflexively shrieking “racism” because Wellington City Council aren’t recommending a change to the NZ Geographic Board.

The lack of a change is not racism: it’s that nobody seems to care. Whanganui Māori got their name change after decades of concerted and organised lobbying, public demonstration, private petition, backroom negotiation, research and campaigning on the topic. What would be racist is to expect that these changes in Wellington — trivial though they are — should go through as of right just because one historian thinks they should. The decision to change an entrenched name is and must remain a matter of civil society deliberation: those who favour the change lobby for it; those who oppose it lobby against it, both bring whatever evidence and principled arguments they can to the discourse, and those authorities empowered to decide the matter do so in accordance with appropriate legislation and customs. So, to those who want the names of Stewart Marjoribanks and Alexander Nairne properly recognised, I say: start lobbying!

L

In the first few days of July I began writing a post about the report of the Foreshore and Seabed Review Panel. Due to absurd busi-ness* I never got it finished. Since the government has this week responded to the review panel’s findings, two months after it undertook to do so, by kicking the issue to touch, I figure now is as good a time as any to examine the issue again.

First, let me begin by clarifying my position on the issue and the government’s handling of it. I have been vocal in my support of the māori party’s willingness to work with National in government, and their willingness to accept a range of lesser policy concessions in service of the repeal of the Foreshore and Seabed Act — not so much on the basis that it (the repeal) will necessarily result in a greater quantum of economic or social benefit than those other concessions might have, but on the basis that the decision is for Māori to make. The māori party, (it is often repeated, mostly by disgruntled Labour supporters) does not represent all Māori, and this is true — but inasmuch as it has kaupapa Māori foundations, it has a stronger philosophical claim to representat those māori who share that kaupapa basis than any other party in parliament; and on this issue in particular, a stronger mandate than the Labour party.

Indigenism

The striking thing about the review, and perhaps the reason for the tardy and incomplete response from the government, is that it is grounded in indigenist principles. It’s not the only indigenist policy document the government has kicked to touch in recent months: the NZGB recommendation that the spelling of Wanganui be corrected to Whanganui is another such thing. Indigenism, here used, is not so much ethnic nationalism (as it is usually given to mean) as a non-eurocentric philosophical basis; one which does not presuppose a Pākehā worldview or rules of engagement — a necessary quality in that sort of political action, but not in itself a sufficient quality. Linda Tuhiwai Smith’s book Decolonising Methodologies provides a clear explication of the practice of indigenist and indigenising research in the Aotearoa-New Zealand context.

The indigenist position derives largely from the choice of panellists (two of whom are Māori scholars) and from the scope of the inquiry, which explicitly gave the panel a mandate to assess the extent to which the FSA “effectively recognises and provides for customary or aboriginal title and public interests” in the foreshore and seabed. This accepted the facts of NZ’s constitutional and legal history and jurisprudence from the Treaty of Waitangi, the Native Land Court and more recently the Māori Land Court, the Waitangi Tribunal, and the Court of Appeal in the Ngāti Apa case: that there are customary rights; they are not a legal fiction or a ‘simple nullity’ as Prendergast had it. These were facts which Labour, claiming to be the natural party of Māori representation, needed a court to tell them — and they reached for the nuclear option of legislation when the court did so. This change is important because it lays the tracks for future legislative and legal events: because the review was conducted from an indigenist basis, the resultant action must necessarily take on an indigenist hue. This was the complaint levelled by all of the usual suspects when the panel was named — as if the job of assessing a dispute over historical rights and legal process could shomehow be neutrally conducted by those whose institutions were responsible for its ongoing rancour.

More than ‘One Nation’

The indigenist perspective embedded in the review process and its frame has resulted in the forthright rejection of “all New Zealanders” rhetoric and the homogenisation which that discourse implies. Diversity exists; different groups have different rights in custom and culture and in law; that reality needs to be carefully managed, not ignored or subsumed by a system which says “we all have the rights I think we should have, and not those which you value”. This is the central foundation on whcih the report and its recommendations stands. In the words of the panel:

the very real problem that arises from the populist notion of “one people” under one law is quite simply that it does not recognise – indeed denies – the fact of the ethnic, cultural and social diversity of our population, which we would argue considerably enriches rather than divides our society. […] We are acutely aware that the notion of “one people” is, in the main, rejected by Māori. Māori say that we are simply two peoples comprising one nation. They see the notion of “one people” emboldened within a western paradigm that is constructed upon those premises and values which underpin the majority culture, the effect of which is to deny their existence. Māori collective property rights have rarely been treated in law in the same way as have non-Māori property rights.

Indeed they haven’t. And there are different conceptions of property rights issues in play here — rights of heredity and customary usage. Submitter Edward Ellison on behalf of Te Rūnanga o Otakau:

What we’re talking about is the mana or rangatiratanga rather than what we might term title or ownership as in the narrow European concept. It just doesn’t do it justice and it can be easily turned against us.

It’s the same issue which resulted in widespread alienation of land in the half-century following the Treaty’s signature: Western legal paradigms of ownership didn’t recognise collective landholdings, so they assumed that lands were the possessions of a given rangatira (or just someone who claimed to be rangatira) to dispose of. The panel, again:

More importantly, throughout this country’s history Māori advocacy and claims have not been made on the basis of ethnicity but of inherited rights – just as non-Māori have made claims and had them met on the basis of inherited rights. Indeed, property and customary rights are not argued on the basis that people are ethnically Māori, but because they have historically inherited rights to specific areas and resources – in the same way as a non-Māori landowner is able to pass down his or her land and associated resources to their children, and so forth.”

This illustrates a point of framing which has shot clear through the discourse around the issue: most discussion is about entitlement or claims under the Treaty of Waitangi, underlined by the fact that tangata whenua have had to go cap-in-hand to the Crown and its authorities. This isn’t a matter of claims or entitlements: it’s about securing rights to resource access and exploitation which never lapsed. The ‘troughing modies’ argument simply ignores the fact that parts of the coast owned by private concerns can and frequently are passed undisturbed down through successive generations of landowners. Just because the resources in question have been handed down collectively in accordance with tikanga, and just because the holders of rights to those resources refuse to accept a Western paradigm of property rights, the claim should be no less valid. This is not to say, however, that the matter is strictly one of property rights. Fundamentally it’s a matter of adherence to the Treaty, which guaranteed tangata whenua the right to their cultural practices (part of ‘tāonga katoa’ from Article 2) which permit them to consider the issue in ways not limited to a strict property-rights interpretation imposed from without.

The excerpts above demonstrate a strong critique of the ‘one nation’ rhetoric, and the falsity of that discourse, in which a culture which is dominant both in terms of numbers and of power draws artificial and appropriative distinctions between transfer of rights and property which are deemed legitimate and those which are deemed illegitimate. This is the discourse which gave rise to Iwi/Kiwi and to the Foreshore and Seabed Act; they are cut from the same cloth. It is the discourse, and the self-serving assimilationism it represents against which the critique is levelled; not against the Pākehā establishment except inasmuch as the two are indistinguishable. Those Pākehā taking umbrage at the critique should, therefore, examine their own role in and allegiance to that discourse and the system which bred it; those who reject it and what it stands for have no cause for alarm from the review process.

Divisions within

But what’s curious is that indigenism, and indigeneity, were central to the review, and to the issue and its future solutions, but ethnicity was not itself a determinant of position among submitters to the review. The panel found that

It was not possible to categorise the submissions by ethnicity in a reliable manner. While provision was made for submitters to specify their ethnicity, this option was not always used, or people elected more than one ethnicity. In any case, ethnicity is not necessarily determinative of viewpoint; some Māori submitters tended towards what might be termed a “Pākehā world view”.

The Foreshore and Seabed dispute is not just a dispute between Māori and Pākehā, as Don Brash and Michael Laws and Chris Trotter would have you believe: the divisions are as much within Pākehā society and Māori society as between them. A ‘clash of civilisations’ paradigm here obscures what’s really happening, it does not illuminate it.

I’ll look more closely at this point, and its cultural and constitutional ramifications, in a future post (when I get time). To be continued.

L

* The same busi-ness which has rendered my posts rare and largely prevented me from participating in the frequently-excellent discussions which have emerged in response to them. Please read my absence as an interested ‘points noted’, and please don’t let my scarceness dissuade you from continuing as you have been.

A victory for common sense and democracy

datePosted on 11:27, September 17th, 2009 by Lew

… these are the sort of words Michael Laws would be using if the decision to spell Whanganui incorrectly had been endorsed by the NZ Geographic Board, so I feel justified in using similar language given that the decision has gone my way.

As I have argued at great length, this is a good decision. I’ll work through the details of the submissions when I get time, hopefully tonight.

L

Submit!

datePosted on 13:21, August 16th, 2009 by Lew

Submissions to the NZ Geographic Board regarding the proposed change of the spelling of ‘Wanganui’ to ‘Whanganui’ close tomorrow. Whether you support the change or the status quo, I urge you to make your position (and arguments) known to the NZGB and to the country.

It will come as no surprise to readers that I support the proposed name change. The majority of my submission is drawn from the four posts I have written on the topic. There’s plenty (plenty!) more about this out there on the interwebs as well.

Submit!

L

Edit: My full submission is below the fold.

Read the rest of this entry »

NZGB to settlers:

datePosted on 14:28, March 31st, 2009 by Lew

Matters of linguistic and geographic fact are determined by meritorious debate, not majoritarian opinion.

Yesterday the New Zealand Geographic Board announced that there is a valid case for the name of the city of Wanganui to be spelt in its correct rendition of Whanganui. (I posted on this issue twice recently.)

The NZGB explicitly rejected the majoritarian argument, stating that the debate was important, not just the show of hands:

The Board noted the results of a referendum held in 2006, when a considerable number of Wanganui residents indicated their preference to retain the current spelling. However, the Board was conscious that declining the proposal at this point would not allow views both for and against to be expressed

Michael Laws has predictably come out calling this an attack on democracy. Unfortunately for demagogues like Laws (fortunately for the rest of us) facts are not democratically determined. Facts are defined by their relationship to reality, not by their relationship to majority opinion. Democracy is good for a very large number of things, but it’s very poor indeed for determining matters of actual factual observable and demonstrable reality.

But the really important aspect of the NZGB’s release are the implications of the following two statements:

“Wanganui, the name given to the town to reflect its position near the mouth of the Whanganui River, was spelt incorrectly and has never been formally gazetted by this Board or its predecessors. It is therefore not currently an official New Zealand place name.”

[…]

“While the Board acknowledges the historical transcription was based on the local pronunciation, the mechanics of standardising a previous unwritten language, together with its full meaning/translation, signal that the name was intended to be ‘Whanganui’. This is about correcting a mistake made more than 150 years ago.”

In these statements Dr Don Grant suggests that a local council may not by simple fiat enshrine an error as a norm – the origin of that error matters, and if its correctness is disputed then the intention of those who originated it becomes relevant. This implies a burden of proof on those wanting to retain the current no-h spelling to demonstrate that those who originally spelt the name that way intended to do so – thereby coining a new word. That is an untenable position held only by those with no genuine arguments of merit, whose leader Laws stated that people who didn’t like the current spelling could go to `Fuckatanay’ (as he pronounced it), neatly highlighting the crass idiocy of the position.

It is also an important matter of precedence. My arguments have been based on the idea that the current spelling of `Wanganui’ is the correct spelling in law, while Dr Grant made quite clear that it has no legitimacy, having never been formally recognised by the body properly constituted to do so, which is not the Wanganui District Council. Because of this, the decision the NZGB needs to make is not whether to confirm the de jure status quo spelling as the settlers suggest, but whether to give the de facto spelling precedence over the de jure status quo, which (since no alternative spelling has been approved by the properly-constituted body) can only be Whanganui. The core of the settler position is this claim to the status quo, that possession is nine tenths of the law and that since the name is currently in settler possession it is theirs to define and use as they wish without consideration to others or to the historical, linguistic and geographic facts of the matter. The status quo in this case is clearly on the side of the h: if the settlers cannot convince the board of their claim it will not remain as Wanganui but will revert to the correct spelling. That’s a huge difference.

Submissions open in mid-May. If you have an argument you want heard on this, make a submission. The debate matters.

L