cost real viagra autoimmune progesterone dermatitis specialist uk doxycycline hyclate dosage lyme disease reviews online viagra ordering cipro hc otic buy online 0.5 mg propecia effective viagra on line united states lactic acidosis in metformin priligy quando prenderlo bulbos de azafran donde comprar viagra cipro tqeovertoz reviews amoxicillin versus ampicillin tadalafil overseas cheap cost ampicillin 500mg is liquid nolvadex injectable viagra in dragon mart prozac 40 mg starting dose of zoloft buy your viagra with paypal buy metformin from canada metformin 500 mg best time to take dapoxetine brand names in pakistan iman 100 clomid mg buy single pills online zithromax viagra replacements over counter where to buy viagra in hyderabad donde puedo comprar cytotec en caracas best price online viagra best time of the day to take cialis where to buy authentic viagra online deltasone hereisthebestin dosage research chemicals for sale nolvadex dosage online viagra consumer check sildenafil black market when do you start taking clomid in your steroid cycle viagra purchase nz generic medications accutane prednisolone dose mgkg credit card payment form generic viagra inderal 40 mg anxiety prednisolone 20 mg contre indication who sells zithromax in virginia dove acquistare viagra zithromax safe cardura and viagra does clomid cause swelling zoloft pills online where can i buy viagra in hong kong estimated viagra market can you buy tadalafil over the counter in toronto low dose cialis 5 mg post finasteride syndrome safe take viagra age 18 metformin xr available in canada finasteride indian pharmacy companies what is propranolol 60 mg viagra australia supplier zovirax suspension pediatrica 200 mg nhs prices viagra where to buy prednisone 5mg rotundine 60 mg prednisone cialis generic non generic when is the best time for older guys to take viagra propecia for women in canada medicament cialis prix en pharmacie viagra shops in sydney doxycycline online uk obat provula 50 mg viagra zovirax 200 mg tablets en walmart buy zithromax online using paypal deutschland online apotheke cialis cost cialis taking 40 mg types of viagra in egypt lasix causes kidney failure viagra camden london viagra effectiveness reviews azithromax price philippines where i can buy viagra in lahore pakistan artrolive generico do viagra cheap generic viagra 100mg canada generic finasteride sun pharma viagra over the counter belgium skinoren 150 mg generic viagra trinalin generic propecia dosering doxycycline vogels en farmacias similares vende tadalafil generic what is maximum viagra dose propecia brand on line glucophage 1000 mg merck serono zoloft show up in urine test cialis 5 mg how much cialis generika in frankreich kaufen medical code for pregnancy resulted in clomid metformina que efectos causa cipla generic viagra review costo de viagra en lima much does viagra cost private prescription accutane 10 mg for oily skin glucophage dergboadre australia metformin in coronary artery disease news on generic viagra metformin 500 mg for fertility viagra delivered in two days no prescription cialis 2.5 mg viagra non prescription ukulele superdrug viagra cost best time to take zoloft medication buying cialis in berlin georgia concealed carry reciprocating states acheter viagra en ligne avec paypal uk cialis 20mg how maney rupese in india pret propranolol 40 mg best way use propecia whats viagra pills in srilanka degenerics generic accutane vente viagra europe were to buy viagra chicago finasteride generic manufacturers of norco diunorm 25 mg of zoloft panca inderal lidah in english cialis 5 mg nota 75 finasteride 1.25 mg results buy zovirax canada viagra sildenafil in india lowest how does cialis cost buy generic propranolol la didrogesterona 10 mg prednisone doxycycline user reviews ubat clomid 50mg can i take 5 htp 100 mg with viagra how much does propecia cost uk clomid wrong dose secure online sights for lasix propranolol 10mg prices sildenafil citrate pills canada how many mg of tadalafil should i take propranolol hcl 40 mg para que sirve ortosamin generico do viagra where to buy viagra in tucson tadalafil professional review zithromax reviews when is priligy available in australia generika viagra test l ornitina l aspartato generico do viagra can i take cialis with atenolol lasix generic name and classification does the propecia generic brand work buy in uk viagra doxycycline hyclate 100 mg empty stomach effects of cialis on blood pressure buying clomid from mexico ampicillin and dicloxacillin tablets nolvadex australia suppliers cialis 28 cpr 5 mg prezzo 40 mg cialis dose response doe zithromax show up in a drug test ciprofloxacin uti price india how long dies it take viagra to work buying cytotec online clomid 50mg bebe viagra article in hindi black cobra sildenafil 120mg india purchse viagra in australia viagra dosage over 65 normal dose of amoxil metformin not digesting in system vitamins safely taken with prednisone zovirax 400 mg dosing buy cytotec online south africa retina specialist in manassas virginia how many mg of viagra how to use clomid and metformin viagra available as generic india diflucan online australia transit amlodipine 5mg safe with viagra can i take viagra with me into france from ireland pain in legs from prednisone 20mg safe take ciprofloxacin metronidazole how to get viagra over the counter in san clement walgreens cialis cost per pill propecia in jhb gold viagra 800 mg detrusitol retard 4 mg beipackzettel ciprofloxacin propecia in combination with marijuana ciprofloxacin hcl 500 mg high performance cialis two 5 mg diodoquin generico do viagra viagra sold in utah safe to take 100mg viagra london ontario viagra 150 mgs clomid prices cialis how many days do you take ampicillin cialis 10 mg cpr pellic viagra accepting paypal ciprofloxacin hcl 500 mg antibiotics espanol can you crush cialis and put in drink doxycycline hyclate acne 100 mg brandstiftung hamburg inderal medication most reliable place to buy cialis online buying clomid in thailand finasteride hair loss increase to 5 mg propecia genericode viagra online viagra buy prescription how to tell if liquid nolvadex is real or fake prednisolone 5mg tablets buy one get one free allergy to vibramycin zoloft costco pharmacy cheapest generic cialis 10mg cialis yearly sales viagra online bestellen hilversum why is lasix used for heart failure comprare cialis on line in italia cost of propecia and minnoxidol can you buy viagra over the counter in boots female viagra otc in mexico risks of clomid accutane smallest dose nolvadex for prohormones where to buy cheap thermoskin tem generico do viagra comprar viagra en madrid ciudad universitaria glucophage 500 mg pcos awareness how to buy viagra from walmart order viagra on the internet did justin timberlake take accutane prednisolone acetate 1 15 ml order accutane online uk how to know how many mg of cialis i need to take how much does nolvadex cost street price doxycycline dosage for sinus infections 1000 mg. metformin twice daily prednisone used for colds metformin 425 mg donde puedo comprar la pastilla priligy tadalafil troche 10 mg troches cost of prednisone tablets how to ask your boyfriend to take viagra cialis mezza dose ampicillin 100mg ml stability balls dermosolon 50 mg zoloft cialis online order dapoxetine brands in pakistan sick over the counter viagra countries with dual citizenship cialis 5 mg one day accutane acne treatments what happen when i taked 2 viagra in one day will 30 mg cialis hurt you propecia discount coupon prescription for clomid cost of doxycycline at costco isotretinoina 20 mg generico do viagra 25 mg viagra recreational capitalist socialism in islam religion amoxil injection price is lasix safe for breastfeeding how many cialis 5 mg can you take prednisolone acid 10 mg nebenwirkungen pille viagra purple triangle pill wholesale viagra sales revenue is ciprofloxacin safe in pregnancy ingesting tadalafil 20 mg first hour clomid challenge test with 50 mg clomid cialis daily how to use que es diflucan 200 mg is 160mg of prednisone be safe while pregant zithromax package insert pdf in powerpoint generic viagra how good is it getting a prescription for accutane prednisone and fluid in ear infecciones causadas por cytotec para que sirve metformin hydrochloride 1000 mg buying clomid 100 mg 10 pills propecia tablet price prednisone 40 mg dose where can i buy viagra over the counter in italy cialis depression treatment price clomid pasadena nausea after taking accutane can i take 2 pills of cialis in one day where to buy doxycycline with no prescription propecia price change why does metformin not dissolve in body cialis 5 mg apotek tadalafil counter cipro dergboadre canada zoloft in timpul sarcinii cialis de 5 mg uso diario aprovel tem generico do viagra cialis dosage 40 mg do you need a prescription for cialis in grand cayman rosacea treatment accutane where can you buy a viagra in sydney india online pharmacy zovirax 15g soft cialis usa generic of clomid propranolol 20 mg withdrawal from hydrocodone cipromed 500 usage cialis generic 5 mg como comprar cialis em portugal socialism in america author real name price of 5mg cialis how to get propecia in south africa clomid chemist warehouse reciprocating saw cordless sale indian viagra dropshipper shipped from usa generic viagra puede causar la muerte cytotec induction franca lai viagra generic buy sildenafil research raw powder zovirax in hong kong diflucan 150 mg used can clomid cause headaches cheapest generic viagra sent overnight cialis generic 10 mg without prescription cytotec for sale in kuwait shops vulvodynia specialists in clearwater florida communism vs socialism effects in world is viagra over the counter in jamaica viagra en mexico venta viagra monologues review consumo viagra in italia is 200 mg diflucan for yeast too strong what is diflucan used for in women generic finasteride or propecia cost viagra treatment for premature ejaculation cialis 4 hour erection how to get doxycycline in singapore viagra for sale in ottawa diffuse thinning propecia online pharmacy canada viagra pharmacy doxycycline without prescription in usa cialis daily use canadian pharmacies can you buy zovirax walgreens is fish oil safe to take with zoloft when is viagra available as generic classification of adrenocorticosteroids prednisone buy cialis pharmacy si puo usare zovirax gravidanza buy lasix without a perscription metformin er user reviews where can i buy online finasteride in liquid form u s cheap viagra novocaine buy online uk viagra getting viagra in las vegas viagra substitute over the counter at gnc cytotec argentinacomprar prednisone is for in leukaemia whats in cobra viagra 10 mgday accutane doxycycline hyclate 20mg tablets doxycycline hyclate cap 300 mg prednisone at walamrt prices buy doxycycline hyclate tablets without prescription sildenafil bubble gum price buyviagrapillsonline search does doxycycline hyclate 150 mg work for epididymitis how much does 1 30 day supply of 5mg cialis cost real viagra montreal finasteride take at night cialis dosage info does clomid or gonadotropins safer ridiculous high price of viagra using clomid purchase online lasix diuretic cost generic drug viagra inderal 40 mg and augmentin xbox one chile donde comprar viagra is sildenafil a generic drug kann viagra ohne rezept apotheke kaufen lopid 600 mg generico de cialis accutane in shanghai cialis soft tabs 5 mg zithromax 1 gm price cipro suspension generic manfaat vibramycin 100 mg tell fake viagra pills where buy clomid how many doses of cytotec is safe viagra in nassua viagraonline com viagra history in urdu lasix j code doxycycline online experience with generic tadalafil donde comprar cialis generico en colombia metformin 500 mg price philippines finasteride farmaco generico viagra availability in islamabad safety abra sildenafil citrate accutane acne generic venta de cytotec en costa rica most economical dosage of cialis to buy sildenafil from india finasteride in australia medicare feline doxycycline hyclate 100 mg 2 times zoloft 25 mg withdrawal from cymbalta viagra e ponte de safena liquid clomid numb tongue buy nolvadex post cycle therapy australia viagra availability in germany purchase metformin baownbeuv can a normal guy take viagra usar pastillas cytotec para abortar elite gain 350 viagra for sale finasteride indian.men cheap generic cialis c20 where to get viagra in qatar cialis on prescription in uk does clomid increase chances of getting pregnant espidifen nombre generico de amoxil what does a generic viagra pill look like viagra prices india us paracetamol cialis generika 20 mg kaufen dapoxetine in europe doxycycline mgkg 10mg accutane on cycle can buy viagra over counter australian viagra bad for you products with tadalafil in them average price viagra 100mg prednisone 50 mg for 5 days bronchitis medication diflucan cream available india hong kong viagra over the counter cialis raise blood pressure metformin 500 mg ne ise yarar order propecia men non generic metformin 1000mg generic viagra com can i bring viagra to costa rica how much liquid clomid for pct lasix used for pleural effusion drs who believe propecia is safe mechanism of action of propranolol in angina pectoris ebastine 20 mg comprimidos viagra clotrimazole 10mg generic cialis how long does a lasix renogram take usa pfizer viagra propranolol online kaufen boots sell viagra over counter can i eat cialis 2 20 mg can you safely take cialis and l arginine together comprar dapoxetine online want to buy cialis discount pills viagra for women available in lahore order tadalafil hereisthebestin can you buy viagra tenerife south zithromax 1000 mg liquid form peranex 20 mg prednisone viagra generika billig kaufen ciprofloxacin difficulty urinating in men viagra kamagra australia payment paypal betalol brand propranolol pengertian panca inderal lidah in english which european nations are socialist cialis 800 mg not real para que se receta el ciprofloxacino 500 mg zovirax suspension costo doxycycline sold online commonly found tadalafil tablets in india doxycycline 1 mg suspension for guinea pigs no script accutane 5 mg day lang en order free viagra sample betahistine long term usage of zoloft is testim safe to use with viagra propecia finasteride prezzo 2000 mg ampicillin voglibose and metformin hydrochloride tablets farmacie online per viagra coupon ciprofloxacino stada efg 500 mg camber zoloft 25 mg pill does doxycycline treat malaria discovery health viagra cialis 5mg kaina 2500 mg metformin how to purchase viagra in australia clomid cause delayed ovulation over the counter evuivalent to viagra can clomid cause excessive discharge tadalafil 20 mg description uso de doxycycline hyclate 100 mg best viagra pill splitter doxycycline swallowing problems metformin 4 mg viagra with out prescription paypal where can i buy doxycycline for humans dose kalenjin comedy propecia reviews can you buy viagra at stores viagra cialis in qatar kegunaan obat sildenafil tab 25 mg prednisone 10 mg dose pack 489 buy cialis auckland nz cipro antibiotic 750 mg prices 10 mg lasix bodybuilding does zoloft make you really tired thuoc viagra mua o dau is viagra available for pensioners in australia how much does 10 mg of cialis cost trustable generic viagra singapore where can buy viagra viagra in treatment of pulmonary hypertension fertility drug like clomid for sale Kiwipolitico » Blog Archive » Partners not Allies: New Zealand and the US sign the Washington Declaration.

Partners not Allies: New Zealand and the US sign the Washington Declaration.

datePosted on 13:57, June 28th, 2012 by Pablo

On June 20 New Zealand Defense Minister Jonathan Coleman and US Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta signed the Washington Declaration, which specifies priority areas of cooperation between the militaries of both countries. The Washington Declaration is a follow-up to the Wellington Declaration signed by New Zealand and the US in November 2010 (with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Foreign Minister Murray McCully doing the honors). The first was a general statement of principle with regard to New Zealand-US security cooperation and bilateral foreign relations. The follow-up provides more detail on the specific areas in which military cooperation will occur. These are counter-terrorism, maritime patrol, anti-piracy operations and humanitarian relief. The details of the logistics involved in those areas have not been finalized and/or made public, and in the case of counter-terrorism operations they are not likely to be divulged beyond a general statement. This has as much to do with New Zealand public sensitivities as it does with US public opinion or classified operational details (for example, the role of the NZSAS in joint counter-terrorism operations with US forces).

What is different in the Washington Declaration is that the military-to-military bilateral relationship is now taking concrete shape, whereas the Wellington Declaration was a diplomatic opening rather than a definitive outlining of military areas in which joint operations and exercises will occur.

Robert Ayson described the relationship as a defacto alliance between the US and New Zealand. Professor Ayson used the phrase because the US and New Zealand are not entering a formal alliance agreement but a “strategic partnership.” An alliance is essentially a contract with mutual obligations; a partnership is a looser arrangement in which obligations are voluntarily assumed but not contractually defined, binding or specified. Partnerships can be reviewed and modified on a case-by-case or temporal basis, whereas alliances commit the parties to treaty-strength obligations that require a major diplomatic rupture for them to be abrogated. This distinction theoretically gives the US and New Zealand a greater degree of flexibility in their relations with each other on military issues. That is diplomatically advantageous for New Zealand, which seeks to preserve its image and reputation for foreign policy independence, and also avoids domestic voter backlash to the resumption of something akin to the ANZUS alliance so spectacularly undone by New Zealand’s 1985 non-nuclear announcement. The Labour, Green and Mana parties, in particular, would have been very resistant to the restoration of a formal military alliance with the US, so on political grounds the strategic partnership agreement works out very well domestically as well as bilaterally.

In practice, the strategic partnership with the US aligns New Zealand with other “first tier” US security partners in the Western Pacific Rim such as Australia, Thailand, Singapore and the Philippines. This is important for the New Zealand Defense Force (NZDF) as it seeks to integrate more closely with Australian Defense Force operational doctrine, training and equipment (as was suggested by the NZDF 2010 Defense White Paper) at a time when Australia and the US are deepening their bilateral security ties (evident in the recently announced agreement to forward base a US Marine rapid response force in Darwin). Ayson is right in that the NZDF will now be working side by side with the US military on a regular and continuous basis in specified areas (such as the upcoming RIMPAC naval exercises that the Royal New Zealand Navy (RNZN) has joined for the first time in two decades), although NZ will have a little more leeway in refusing US requests to join in foreign conflicts than if it had signed a formal alliance agreement that required both parties to come to their respective defense.

The resumption of near-complete bilateral military ties between New Zealand and the US is not a surprise. The 5th Labour government (1999-2008) started the rapprochement with the US post 9/11, and the National governments that followed it have openly embraced the prospect of finally overcoming the post-ANZUS freeze in security relations (with the exception of intelligence-sharing, which never suffered the curtailment of ties seen in military relations). Labour was wary of being seen as getting too close to the US, since that could jeopardize its reputation for an “independent and autonomous” foreign policy stance, particularly amongst non-aligned and small states. National prefers to embrace the US more whole-heartedly, in part because of the belief that there will eventually be economic as well as military benefits in doing so (such as via the Transpacific Partnership trade agreements currently being negotiated by the US, New Zealand and seven other Pacific Rim states). The idea behind National’s approach appears to be to use the improved military ties with the US as a hedge against the rise of The People’s Republic of China (PRC) by countering or balancing increased economic dependence on the PRC with the strengthening of economic and military ties with the US and other pro-Western nations along the Pacific periphery. National seems to believe that this balancing act (or straddling of fences), continues the tradition, or at least appearance of independence in foreign affairs.

That may be a mistake because independence in foreign affairs is most often predicated on neutrality with regards to foreign conflicts or great power rivalries. In aligning itself more closely with the US on military matters, New Zealand loses that appearance of neutrality in international security affairs. The New Zealand Foreign Affairs and Defense ministries may believe that this is the best hedge against attempts by the PRC to exploit its economic relationship with New Zealand (since the PRC is clearly the dominant partner in the bilateral Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with New Zealand and has much leverage on New Zealand when it comes to Chinese market access as well as exports and investment from the PRC to New Zealand). Balancing economic dependence on China with strengthened security ties with the US (and its allies) may appear to National to be the best way of New Zealand having its cake and eating it.

Strengthening of political ties with the US is part of National’s larger policy of reaffirming diplomatic alignment with traditional partners. The belief is that New Zealand shares more in terms of core values with these traditional partners due to the Anglo-Saxon liberal democratic traditions that bind them together, rather than the mixed Confucian-Communist values that underpin the core beliefs of the Chinese political elite (or the Islamic beliefs of New Zealand’s Middle Eastern trading partners). Even if the PRC was to continue growing economically at a pace similar to the last decade (which now seems improbable), it seems prudent under this logic for National to reaffirm its Western heritage, joint vision and general orientation until such a time as China and other non-Western authoritarian states begin to open up politically. Reaffirming political ties to the US and other traditional allies does not undermine New Zealand’s position with Asian democracies like India, South Korea, Taiwan or Japan, or with Southeast Asian democracies (such as they are) like Malaysia, Indonesia and the Philippines. All of these countries, as well as Southeast Asian authoritarian states such as Singapore and Viet Nam, fear the rise of China as a military power and/or economic hegemon in the Western Pacific, and therefore welcome any counter-balancing efforts on the part of the US and its strategic partners and military allies.  The political alignment with the US also fits in line with the foreign policy approaches of Australia and the UK, and reasserts New Zealand’s position within that informal alliance structure (Canada is part of it as well).

There are benefits for both the US and New Zealand in this restored relationship. The benefits for New Zealand are that the NZDF will get to conduct exercises and operations with the most hardened, experienced and technologically advanced military in the world. That will expose it to the latest in US strategic doctrine and tactics. It may also result in the US providing military equipment to and training opportunities for New Zealand that it otherwise could not afford. It will reassure New Zealand of the implicit US defense guarantee in the event that New Zealand were to be threatened or attacked (to include economic coercion by the likes of the PRC). It may lead to closer economic ties, although that remains an open and much debated question (there is a large literature on security partners being preferential economic partners because of the mutual trust and dependence established between them. Most of that literature was written during the Cold War and things changed after it ended, but now with the emergence of the PRC and other powers some of those old assumptions are being resurrected and reviewed, especially in the US).

For the US the agreement is win-win. It gets an immediate benefit from securing another strong security partner in the South Pacific, one that has considerable “local knowledge” and relative influence in South Polynesia. This accords with the shift in US strategic emphasis to the Asia-Pacific, which is part of a long-term strategy of ring-fencing Chinese attempts at blue water expansion into the region. In signing New Zealand to a bilateral military partnership similar to those of other Western Pacific states, the US has moved to establish a security cordon in the region, something that also serves as a force multiplier in the measure that US strategic partners commit military assets to a common cause. New Zealand’s reputation as an honest broker in international affairs gives it diplomatic cover in this effort.

More importantly, after 25 years of estrangement and New Zealand foreign policy independence, at least with regard to international security affairs, the US has finally broken down New Zealand’s resolve and returned it to the fold. Post 1985 wooing of New Zealand began during the Clinton administration and continued with his successors. 9/11 accelerated the reconciliation (under a Labour government), and the Wellington Declaration codified it. In many respects, the US’s ability to re-gain New Zealand’s signature on a bilateral military-security agreement is a triumph of long-term great power diplomacy: after years of distance it secured junior military partnership from a small democratic state that prides itself on its modern history of foreign policy independence. To be sure, fluid global conditions since 1990 have contributed to the evolution in US-New Zealand bilateral relations, but at present it appears that the US has finally managed the contretemps of New Zealand non-nuclearism with diplomatic aplomb and to its ultimate benefit.

The negatives for New Zealand could be that the US will pressure it to increase its spending on defense, now below 1 percent of GDP, to something more in line with Australia’s two percent per annum. This would be on a par with other US strategic partners and around the NATO average, but will be politically unpalatable amongst New Zealand voters, who tend to under-appreciate defense when compared with education, health and welfare. Thus any such request will be politically thorny for a New Zealand government.  However, the US can leverage the fact that the NZDF is not “pulling its weight” in the strategic partnership (the Australians already say this).

For example, although the Washington Declaration speaks about closer bilateral military cooperation in the areas of maritime patrol and anti-piracy, New Zealand has very little in the way of long-range patrol and interdiction capabilities. Specifically, New Zealand only has two blue water ANZAC-class frigates, two off-shore patrol vessels and six long-range P-3 patrol aircraft, and its multi-purpose ship, the HMNZS Canterbury, spends more time in port being repaired than at sea, As for its logistical lift capability, not only is the HMNZS Canterbury unreliable, but the RNZAF C-130 fleet, at five aircraft, is also small and already stretched in terms of its operational readiness. Thus the US and Australia can pressure New Zealand governments to increase spending on defense so as to be able to perform the responsibilities and tasks that are expected of it as a strategic partner in the areas designated as joint priority.

There is the risk of being drawn into US conflicts that have nothing to do with New Zealand or an imminent threat to it. Even if New Zealand has leeway in terms of refusing a US request to get involved in a non-immediate foreign conflict, once bilateral military ties are established and consolidated they constitute a source of leverage on the part of the US since any retaliatory cancellation or disruption of the bilateral relationship will hurt the NZDF more than it will the US military. Moreover, the bilateral diplomatic backlash from a public refusal to work with the US in a foreign conflict theater could overcome any domestic and international support for the move.

There is also the more immediate issue of diplomatic fallout over the partnership. The more that New Zealand is seen as aligning itself with the US on security matters, the more US rivals such as Russia, the PRC, and various Latin American and Middle Eastern states will see it as a tool of US foreign policy and military strategy. Even other “independent” states like Uruguay, Finland, Costa Rica, Estonia and Turkey may begin to recast their view of New Zealand as an honest broker in international affairs. That is why National’s belief that its fence-straddling or hedging strategy will continue the image of independence may not work out to be the case, which could have adverse diplomatic consequences.

(The original version of this essay appears at 36th-Parallel.com)

 

6 Responses to “Partners not Allies: New Zealand and the US sign the Washington Declaration.”

  1. Robert Glennie on June 28th, 2012 at 15:00

    The United States and China have their uses and their abuses in terms of how they fit into the ideal New Zealand foreign policy. On one hand there is no denying both nations have a keen interest in the South Pacific with large investments and – so both would probably claim – strategic interests. But how do those strategic interests affect New Zealand and more importantly how do they affect the stability of our neighbours, small Pacific island states who do not have the clout to stand up to China and/or the United States? It is their people who will suffer the most.

  2. Hugh on June 28th, 2012 at 15:52

    “More importantly, after 25 years of estrangement and New Zealand foreign policy independence, at least with regard to international security affairs, the US has finally broken down New Zealand’s resolve and returned it to the fold.”

    Another way to look at it is that the USA has finally given in and accepted that New Zealand’s nuclear weapons policies are not an obstacle to a military-to-military relationship.

    You could argue this has less to do with the acceptance of a principle and more to do with the US’ diminished need for nuclear weapons in a post Cold War environment, but still. To quote JFK, “the other guy blinked first”.

    (I also think you underplay the 1990s National government’s attempts to mend the breach).

  3. Pablo on June 28th, 2012 at 16:14

    Hugh:

    You are correct that the US relaxed its view of NZ non-nuclearism, and that it relies much less now on nukes (at least as a deterrent).

    I have written elsewhere that after 9/11 the US needed all of the friends that it could get, and that prompted the review of the US approach to NZ (you may recall Condi Rice’s comment about the nuclear issue being a “bump in the road” towards strong bilateral relations). Given the US interest in shoring up NZ support in the “war on terror” (sic), the review of the US approach was sensible and overdue.

    The 5th Labour govt got the ball rolling on the issue of rapprochement in bilateral security ties, and if I have heard correctly, played a bit loose with the truth when publicly commenting on the degree to which US and NZDF forces were linked in foreign conflict theaters. However, the current National approach seems to have lost sight of the tradition of foreign policy independence, or at least appears to me to be muddled in terms of the assessing the pros and cons over the short and long term in changing that stance.

    I disagree that the 1990s National governments differed considerably from the 4th or 5th Labour governments with regard to the post ANZUS “breach.” That had as much to do with the post cold war diplomatic and geopolitical context as it did ideological disposition on the part of those governments. In fact, foreign policy continuity was the general NZ norm from 1985 until 2001, after which the process described above came into play.

  4. Hugh on June 28th, 2012 at 17:37

    Well, we’ve disagreed before on the degree of foreign policy continuity between the fourth Labour and fourth National governments and usually I would be reluctant to go all the way around the mulberry bush again, but I think this perspective might bring something new to it.

    In 1997 US Armed Forces (I forget which branch) participated in exercises in the South Island, and in 1999 the National government was pursuing the purchase of surplus F-16s direct from the US military. It’s hard to imagine the fourth Labour government doing either.

    I think the reason there was no movement is that in the 1990s, the US didn’t really need any extra allies, but as you say, in the post 9/11 world, they did.

  5. Chris Waugh on June 28th, 2012 at 18:28

    Sorry, Pablo, but I have to disagree with your “Confucian-Communist” characterisation of the Chinese political elite. Qin Shihuang was a much greater fan of Han Feizi’s Legalism than Confucianism, and did his best to get rid of the Confucianists. One could argue that Chinese governments through history have been more about a thin veneer of Confucianism masking a Legalist framework. Mao Zedong was a big fan of Qin Shihuang (and if you were of an authoritarian streak looking to unite a very diverse and divided society under your own rule, you probably would be, too), and PRC tradition seems to have far more in common with the Qin Dynasty’s Legalism (and bury the Confucianists!) than with Confucianism. A more detailed and better informed argument as to the Legalist nature of the PRC can be found at The Useless Tree (http://tinyurl.com/yffpqzj).

    The “Confucian-Communist” label would also seem to ignore the very strongly Nationalist tradition of the CCP – remember, both the CCP and the KMT revere Sun Yatsen as the founding father of modern China, and one of his Three Principles of the People was Nationalism.

    This might seem rather nitpicky, but I think you’re right in that warmer ties with the US are directly related to China’s rise and increasing influence and the desire to not be completely steamrolled by the Chinese juggernaut. And it would seem that our good buddy Voreqe Bainimarama has been feeling a bit more love from his new friends in Beijing than Fiji’s old friends to his south. Bainimarama strikes me as being the kind of guy who could appreciate Han Feizi’s philosophy as applied by Qin Shihuang and Mao Zedong. I can think of elements in NZ’s political scene who would also be quite appreciative of Han Feizi’s view of the world and how to rule it, including some currently in the government. Strict laws, tough enforcement, harsh punishment… There are people who like those ideas, but Confucians are not among them.

    Just saying that we may need to take a closer, more detailed look at the actual values motivating the Chinese political elite and how they may influence affairs in the Pacific.

  6. Pablo on June 28th, 2012 at 19:29

    Thanks Chris.

Leave a Reply

Name: (required)
Email: (required) (will not be published)
Website:
Comment: