viagra price buy online super pro cms singapore buy brand viagra is there cialis 50 mg clorhidrato de clobenzorex generico de cialis glucophage tab 500mg what brand of zithromax cures gonorrhea lasix bestellen ohne rezept the cost of propecia merck lacoste 120 sildenafil zovirax cream cheap trusted online pharmacy viagra everything in minute online sildenafil sildenafil counterfeit 20 mg clomid uk is there a natural herb that works like viagra alternative of viagra in delhi cialis pills co uk what is walmarts price for cialis 20mg generic viagra with greendot card monthly price of clomid prescription come comprare la viagra sildenafil 50 mg en mujeres mayores can viagra cause edema local places in spain to buy viagra buy viagra in ireland online business viagra 800 com india buy clomid online no prescriptions sildenafil stada 50 mg preis propecia generico prezzo vouchers viagra online prescription required purchase gastrologist specialist in bankstown can you get clomid at walmart buy viagra professional cheap why take clomid and metformin viagra pramil como usar whatsapp costco cost for viagra use of viagra in islam difference cialis 10 et 20 mg prednisone 20 mg teva nisopred 5 prednisolone viagra women available india lasix cause kidney stones how long for 2 150 mg of diflucan to work viagra donde comprar en argentina if a teenager takes viagra is it safe viagra effective after ejaculation reviews watermelon viagra effect comprar cialis farmacia sin receta generic cialis guercmorteo viagra for men for sale in mumbai buy viagra in niferia how long does viagra take to work 100mg cavalieri del reale ordine di cipro cytotec price in ghana armond acne treatment accutane reviews and results prednisone costo que es una pastilla de viagra for sale sildenafil 50 mg mkiii what can i buy that just like viagra precio generico viagra accutane micro dose ciprofloxacina 100 mg ampolla tadalafil citrate and purchase zoloft premature ejaculation reviews importing viagra from india is 10mg of accutane enough cheap viagra over the counter uk tresleen 25 mg of zoloft is prednisone safe for your dog pfizer viagra online paypal uk inderal la 80 price ranges can you get high off of doxycycline hyclate 100 mg buying clomid no prescription how much viagra is safe in one day is indian propecia real does clomid cause earlier ovulation cialis online drugs finasteride topical use can cialis cause seizures makan clomid 100mg coupon free cialis 5 mg where can buy viagra without prescription accutane marketing misoprostol cytotec in italia can i buy clomid without a prescription sildenafil stada 100 mg beipackzettel cheapest zoloft without prescription doxycycline how much to take clomid price in malaysia samsung can i buy viagra in cuba is generic for viagra safe how to tell real viagra lasixwatrpills paypal can doxycycline cause yeast infections in women socialism in usa history counterfeit viagra thailand linagliptin metformin generico viagra online is it safe best time take nolvadex cycle doxycycline 200 mg quad tab vets sildenafil kaufen in deutschland best time day prednisone viagra brand buy paracetamol during pregnancy 500 mg metformin can i take 4000 mg of metformin a day where can i get viagra in malta sinot clav generico de cialis sildenafil 20 mg pharmacokinetics in the elderly metformin dosage in renal impairment classification scoliosis specialists in houston tx turkish journalist karakaya viagra for sale msd propecia 1mg best take cialis can you go in the sun if you are on prednisone quanto costa cialis en farmacia prednisone 28 mg po available in etobicoke pharmacy best generic tadalafil viagra on line no rx keep viagra suppositories in refrigerator philippines generic viagra cialis and prices in egypt how well is socialism working in venezuela online viagra comparison best way to get the most out of viagra is daily cialis reviews prix de cialis en tunisie nolvadex whartisthebestin no prescription viagra generico qual nome can i order cialis on line what is liquid nolvadex sildenafil generique canada can you buy finasteride online can you buy over the counter viagra in vancouver canada cost viagra philippines viagra 50 milligrams cost ocupas receta para comprar viagra cost of metformin er 1000 when will the price of cialis come down does walgreens sell finasteride over the counter can i take clomid with a cyst gas lacrimogeno donde comprar viagra viagra pills in the uk cialis prices at walgreen ranbaxy equivalent to viagra order online priligy in dubai how quickly will i get pregnant on clomid what is the mg for cialis daily metformin gliclazide bioequivalence of generic drugs ciprohexal 500 mg filmtabletten buy propecia lloyds pharmacy portland viagra affiliate marketing viagra in magazin bucuresti cipro lyme disease viagra tablet pakistan in price wrinkle rewind and oxygenius donde comprar viagra clomid counterproductive is doxycycline used to cure gonorrhea metformin hcl 500 mg 24hr sa table propranolol public speaking dosage40 mg ciprofloxacin 500 mg 100 count bottle shock can you get nolvadex in australia does cialis work in the first day vitamin a maximum safe dose of viagra buying viagra generics pro e contro del cialis canada reviews on doxycycline for acne buy us viagra online como comprar cytotec campinas doxycycline topical use tokyogeo fig buy zoloft montclair hexal 10 mg prednisone remedio bi profenid 150 mg zoloft red cialis viagra 200mg inderal retard 80 mg biverkningar snus cytotec causa infeccion doxycycline dosage for pid vibramycin 200 mg tabletten voor finasteride proscar bestellen doxycycline vartinary products for sale piroxicam 20 mg obat apa methylprednisolone is cialis safe to get pregnant can u buy metformin without a prescription amoxil next day delivery uk canadian class action accutane zoloft for panic attacks reviews free prescription viagra zithromax 500 mg daily cual es la mejor pagina para comprar viagra sermion 30 mg pfizer viagra cialis online latvija glimepiride 2mg metformin 500mg in cipla india prednisone pregnancy uk cialis e20 generics24 ohne wirkung von viagra gold 800mg for sale clomid and testosterone replacement therapy buy clomid medication maximum sildenafil tablets 130 mg iron tab metformin 500 mg usa propecia tadalafil nhs prescription doxycycline bronchitis treatment nolvadex 10mg manufacturers in uk optimal viagra dose pepto bismol liquid dog dosage prednisone claversal 500 mg wirkstoff cialis amoxicillin 750 mg dosierung ciprofloxacin viagra 50 mg erowid buy uk lady viagra accutane still in body hoodia gordonii donde comprar viagra cialisis best time of day to take for better results tadalafil bulk powder uk how many mg of accutane cost per dose of cialis acetalgin 500 mg metformin which pharmacy sell cialis in kuwait can you buy viagra pharmacy spain nhs provera and clomid online is viagra safe for older men nolvadex in indian market is clomid from india safe can zoloft work in two weeks ormlite dao generic viagra wal mart cialis prices can you take 2 50mg clomid instead of buying 100mg finasteride costs 90 days synulox palatable tablets 500 mg metformin buy viagra shanghai finasteride generico comprar cialis cost hong kong viagra bestellen pillendienst propranolol hcl 20 mg tabs viagra will get in uae sildenafil 20 mg price comparison safety of zoloft otrexup generic viagra come comprare cialis on line 60 mg prednisone for 2 weeks cialis buy from uk glyburide and metformin in pregnancy lowest price viagra with a prescription best ovulation test to use with clomid should i take clomid if i ovulate regularly viagra for women effects viagra timing in urdu zithromax pharmacy uk flomax over the counter equivalent to viagra cost of 30 2.5milcialis tablets generic tadalafil made me sick vanuatu viagra online cipla shop viagra canada is ampicillin safe to take during pregnancy viagra discount on line safe to use viagra twice in the same day finasteride dergboadre australia cipro 500 ml para que se utiliza does amoxil treat pneumonia herbal viagra for women in india viagra kaufen indien cheapest viagra cialis au can clomid cause a cyst to rupture is it illegal to buy viagra online in germany 10 mg prednisone dose best way to lose weight with metformin er is cialis safe to take with oxcycodone new zealand pharmacy viagra prednisone 10 mg back pain sildenafil over counter substitute ciprofloxacin 500 mg n3 fresas cubiertas de chocolate donde comprar viagra can prednisone cause postmenopausal bleeding what category is prednisone in pregnancy how long for finasteride to take effect generico cialis dr siminovitch online sale of viagra in pakistan medical store 3 failed rounds of clomid reviews que pasa si tomo 40 mg de cialis is 750 mg of zithromax enough to cure chlamydia ciprofloxacin genericon nebenwirkungen 20 mg of prednisone make you gain weight sildenafil tablet price metformin solubility in dmf generico de priligy en mexico can u get a tattoo while on accutane can clomid cause urinary tract infections racialist in 1960 who ships cialis to canada review cialis generic 10 23 year old viagra review viagra dosagem certa generic viagra indian fda types of birth defects caused by accutane generic is viagra illegal in the bahamas brand lasix safety of voglibose and metformin combination viagra 100mg ou 50mg beste wirkung von cialis diflucan oral tablet australia massive houses for sale in uk zithromax viagra kopen online gliclazide 80 mg with metformin 500mg and weight individuelt tilskud cialis generic cost in rupees of viagra 200 mg viagraa cialis brand paypal online viagra cost and insurance bedranol propranolol hydrochloride generic written prescriptions for viagra where can i buy cialis in manila how to know if internet viagra is real the best homemade replacement of viagra trittico 150 mg wirkung viagra snafi tadalafil reviews for bodybuilding can you take avodart with viagra fuentes de agua feng shui donde comprar viagra cialis box paypal viagra wall clock is there a generic for tadalafil viagra times of india cialis confiscation canada customs propecia 2mg day nolvadex buying uk 50 oder 100 mg viagra how to take 200mg of clomid reciprocation map ccw between states is it safe to take propranolol long term price of generic cipro user buy viagra propranolol reviews public speaking chlamydia treatment antibiotics doxycycline viagra spray onde comprar produtos venda sildenafil 50 mg viagra price bangladesh where can i get free sample of viagra what is the price of viagra in karachi accutane reviews for women cipro safe take while breastfeeding alternative of viagra in delhi medications with metformin in them buy azithromycin doxycycline sildenafil vaginal pessaries brands available in india generic viagra from walmart sildenafil in pulmonary artery hypertension ct tadalafil tablets 20mg manufactura india venta online de finasteride 20 mg nolvadex 25 mg proviron glipizide metformin vs janumet is it safe to take diazepam and viagra can i purchase zithromax over the counter prednisone effects in men provera 50 mg viagra does cialis affect women in conceiving hareid viagra for sale pastillas viagra generico in italia is viagra safe if you have hep c juegos reunidos geyper donde comprar viagra viagra sale seattle where can i buy cialis in toronto can viagra stay in body for 2 days valor del viagra en chile use viagra tablet target pharmacy price cialis original intended use of viagra when does uk licence run out cialis much does accutane treatment cost cipro offices in durban efectos de sobredosis de viagra online is finasteride available in ireland secalip 145 mg 30 comprimidos viagra apprilon doxycycline reviews katelaris p viagra australia oraxim 6 cpr riv 500 mg metformin lasix 40 mg bijsluiter actonel once a month generic viagra tadalafil online au where to buy propecia 0.5 mg in malaysia cytotec online no rx overnight grepid 75 mg bijwerkingen doxycycline walmart pharmacy sildenafil cost cialis eciwlcodkedefe for sale viagra for sale 25mg buy clomid research chemicals cardiovascular specialist in the army clomid price mercury drug website sos specialist in okc ok use of cipro in pediatric patients cipro 500 mg informacion phototoxicity doxycycline treatment ciprofloxacino 500 mg uretritis cialis 20 mg equal to what in viagra zovirax injection cost viagra by pfizer online sales of viagra statistics how many viagras in 24 hours can i take generic viagra if i have performance anxiety singapore buy cialis buy viagra canada online saroten 25 mg biverkningar av metformin spectrum 500 mg ciprofloxacin side drug bank of sildenafil citrate prednisone 10 mg tab cad sildenafilcalox counterfeit generic finasteride effective is 25 mg of prednisone a lot viagra in bangladesh produced by square customer reviews for viagra urgent delivery of viagra watch viagra blue online sildenafil revatio 20 mg buy chinese herbal viagra duro clomid iui statistics como usar nolvadex en un ciclo posologie zoloft 50 mg best ayurvedic viagra india is clomid used for low testosterone prednisolone nycomed 25 mg tabletten mastiff where to buy viagra in ksa buy zithromax canada pharmacy prednisone prescription price prednisone 100 mg tablet generic cialis paypal isotretinoin roaccutane review how long does 5 day zithromax stay in your system sildenafil kaufen gnstig why prednisolone in the morning viagra liquid form uk corporation viagra buy egypt does doxycycline cause facial hair ciprofloxacin ya and you taking avodart and finasteride together max dose of dapoxetine viagra pay with paypal uk what are the uses of viagra tablet is it safe for females to take viagra zithromax sciroppo costochondral junction nolvadex to reverse gyno cheepest viagra for sale dahlonega 10 mg prednisone cialis shipment from canada doxycycline nausea help take how much viagra propecia 5mg price 20 mg tadalafil or 100mg viagra purchase cialis on the internet cholestat 20 mg cialis can i take doxycycline if i allergic to ceclor metapro xl 50 mg viagra 5 mg prednisone dosage asthma shelf life cipro 500 mg 50 mg prednisone taper dose generic cialis shipped within canada how long can a person take doxycycline clomid preseed instead cup where to buy when will fda approved generic viagra viagra online eczane comparateur prix cialis viagra pills names in pakistan brand names of cytotec where can i buy viagra otc effetti collaterali pillola viagra online viagra model in football jersey name bar how many mg of generic viagra is needed to work order priligy bertibarots orfiril long 500 mg beipackzettel ciprofloxacin sildenafil generika rezeptfrei when will cialis go generic in usa glucophage 500 mg for pregnancy do many people take propecia in uk zithromax buy online ukash genericos de viagra precios clomid resistance in pcos hidden forest estates cialis doxycycline 100mg dosage std best products to use after accutane dosage of doxycycline to treat acne best places to buy generic viagra ilosone 20 mg cialis safest place for viagra comprar pastillas cytotec en colombia comen prednisone 10 mg 6 day directions for gout why does cialis come in smaller dosages than viagra order cialis cheap online doxycycline dose for urine infection ciprofloxacin 500mg ingredients sale zovirax in der ssw cheap and effective viagra online viagra in 24 hours wats the price of cialis best clomid brand viagra valium kamagra discreet uk europe prednisolone sodium phosphate brand enterococcus treatment ampicillin is viagra otc in saudi riyadh diuretico lasix 40 mg how to take dose of viagra on buy zithromax powder on line cialis generico 24h specialist food shops in helsinki prednisone 10 mg and birth control ineffective purchase cialis online cheap Kiwipolitico » 2011 » March
Archive for ‘March, 2011’

Like a fox?

datePosted on 21:02, March 29th, 2011 by Lew

Lynn at The Standard has a nothing to see here sort of post about how the Darren Hughes scandal isn’t important. True to form, he misses the fact that that the ‘Labour footsoldiers’ for whom he claims the scandal is an irrelevant distraction are the least-important players in this particular game. What matters is the public, and in that regard the views of the media and the ‘beltway creatures’ matter plenty. So while he might be right that it’s a beat-up and there’s nothing in it, that doesn’t really matter — if Labour treats this as a matter of ‘business as usual’ the results will be deservedly catastrophic.

But one thing which struck me while watching the news coverage of the Dunedin stand-ups before and after the front bench meeting today: he looks happy and confident and genuinely at ease; even effusive. As some wag on twitter said: “Phil, leave some kool-aid for the rest of the caucus!” Looks like he did, because the front bench response of solidarity also looks like it’s for real. If you watch it with the sound off, it’s the very model of a party holding a unified front.

The trouble is that what Goff is saying — that his leadership is stronger now than it was before the Hughes scandal broke — is totally barking mad. It simply doesn’t make any actual logical sense that it would be, that it could be. My instinct is that the fact the caucus and the advisers are letting him bark in this way indicates an utter dereliction of duty on the part of the advisers, and a complete lack of political nerve and sense on the part of the caucus. But, as I argued the other day, as bad as Labour is, I don’t think they’re that far gone. So maybe there’s an explanation other than mass political psychosis: maybe he’s banking on this strategy being just barking mad enough to work. This response, for all its other failings, does hint at the Machiavellian characteristic of virtù which I/S (I believe correctly) diagnosed as lacking in Phil Goff’s leadership. It is nothing if not audacious. It is certainly not a ‘business as usual’ response.

So maybe he’s hoping to catch the government on the hop by simply pretending his situation isn’t as dire as it is and hoping that the pretence is infectious. Perhaps it’s actually not pretence; perhaps he really does have that support. Perhaps he’s relying on people ignoring the waffly words and inept deeds and simply taking their cues from the appearance of functionality which Labour is trying to present.

This might not be as far-fetched as it sounds: Lynn does make a good point that people don’t pay close attention to the details; and it’s an old trick to watch political TV appearances with the sound off to get a feel for how a naïve viewer might perceive it and to look more closely at the underlying messages about the political actors and organisations which appear in them.* This sort of presentation of functionality is also a pretty good indicator of eventual success: Drew Westen documents cases where random voters could predict with reasonable accuracy the outcomes of political contests by watching brief segments of silent footage and simply observing the political actors’ nonverbal cues.**

So are they crazy like a fox? Yeah, nah, I don’t really believe it either. The hell I know. Good luck to Phil, and all of them, because they’re going to need it.

So, setting aside the conventional wisdom that Labour is just marching into an electoral abyss, what are your theories as to what they’re up to at present? Wackier the better.

L

* There’s a bit of this sort of analysis done on US political events, such as Sarah Palin’s blood libel speech — see here for example. Though not really the same thing, it’s also worth you googling “breath libel”. Scary.
** I’ve lent my copy of The Political Brain to someone, so I can’t substantiate this at the moment, sorry.

Off the hook

datePosted on 19:29, March 27th, 2011 by Lew

On Red Alert, Clare Curran has a hapless pro-forma whinge about the standard of media coverage in New Zealand vis-a-vis in the UK, where a quarter million people are presently engaging in running battles with police; compared with here, where the media are obsessed with Darren Hughes.

Excuse me if I sound like a broken record, but the fundamental issue here isn’t exactly uncharted territory, and the fact that Clare has a lower opinion of the media than I do should make it easier to accept my advice, which is this: If you want the media to talk about something, Clare, give them a reason to talk about it. Make a stink, cause a scene, do something which makes not talking about it impossible. As a quote attributed to Benjamin Franklin says: write a book, or do something worth writing a book about.

If you don’t give the media a compelling reason to care, don’t be surprised if they don’t. If you don’t provide them with something powerful to cover, they’ll go with scandal and innuendo every time. In the fable of the scorpion and the frog, the scorpion stings the frog. Why? To do so is in its nature. Frogs, while unable to prevent scorpions from stinging, would at least be wise to deny them the opportunity.

With that in mind, some of the following in this case might also have helped:

  • Have frontbench MPs not do stupid stuff which appeals to the public (not the media) sense of scandalous voyeurism;
  • Have your party leader do more than the absolute minimum possible in response to said scandal;
  • In doing more than the absolute minimum, have the party leader respond in just one move rather than in several successive ineffectual steps which maximise the coverage across several news cycles, including a weekend leading into a Parliamentary recess when political news is going to be thin on the ground anyway;
  • Ensure the party president is sufficiently apprised of said scandal that he finds out about it by some means other than reading the papers;
  • Even in the incredibly unlikely event that you can’t do the preceding, at least have your party leader and president sit down together for long enough to agree on a unified position, so as not to give credence to rumours of a leadership challenge.

It’s not that Labour didn’t give the media something to cover, so the media covered the Darren Hughes scandal by default: it’s that Labour gave the media the Darren Hughes scandal to cover, covered in juicy scandal juice, and then didn’t give them anything more compelling to cover instead. (As if there is something more compelling than a sexual investigation into a male frontbench MP’s alleged dalliance with a teenaged male youth MP in the house of the deputy leader after a Parliamentary function, which was covered up for two weeks by the party leader.)

Let me be crystal clear: the issue here is not about right and wrong, or about justice. Perhaps it should be, but electoral politics is not about what should be; it’s about what is. If you choose to privilege ‘justice’ over ‘politics’, as Phil Goff claimed on Q+A this morning, there’s a political cost to doing so; a political cost which, while it might be regrettable, isn’t something to whinge about. After all: if you made the choice you’re presumably better off than if you’d chosen differently. To behave as if it were otherwise, and to blame the media for their role in exacting that price is to blame the scorpion for having a sting in its tail.

Anyone to whom this dynamic isn’t clear has no business running strategy for a Sunday book club, much less a political party which aspires to government. As long as Labour continue to fail at this, one of the most basic tasks of politics, the phone will remain off the hook.

L

Maui Street

datePosted on 10:04, March 25th, 2011 by Lew

For some weeks now I’ve been meaning to give a big up to Morgan Godfery and his blog Maui Street.

Over the past six months Morgan has been writing prolifically on NZ society, politics and constitutional topics. He is unapologetically indigenist, but with a sensitivity to the political realities of indigeneity in a Pākehā political and social system. Unsurprisingly, this balance means he and I share similar perspectives on many subjects; notably the uselessness of the Labour party and the desperate need for a genuine contest of political ideas within New Zealand’s left. On other topics, not so much: he supports banning gang patches and is considerably more critical of the Iwi Leadership Group in and ‘corporate iwi’ (in which he broadly includes the leadership of the māori party) than I am.

One major difference is that Morgan is actually Māori himself, so speaks more authentically on many of these issues than I can — and indeed, than almost anyone in the NZ blogosphere can. Especially useful are his evaluations of the māori party (parts one and two); the Kīngitanga; the best and worst-performing Māori MPs; and of the Welfare Working Group report and what it means for the māori party.

But there’s a lot more than that. So go and read his archive, join the kōrero. Aotearoa needs more discussions like this sort of writing could kick off.

L

Recuerdos de la Muerte (Memories of Death).

datePosted on 14:08, March 24th, 2011 by Pablo

Today (March 24) is the 35th anniversary of the coup that ushered in the “dirty war” in Argentina that cost 30,000+ lives, more than 10,000 “desparecidos”  (“disappeared,” or those who were last seen in custody but whose bodies have never been discovered), with tens of thousands tortured and exiled. Never has the dark side of the Argentine psyche been on worse display than during the so-called “Proceso de Reorganisacion Nacional” (“Process of National Reorganisation”), and hopefully the bitter lessons learned will prevent a repetition of that wretched episode in Argentine history. The hard truth is that although the September 11, 1973 golpe that ousted Salvador Allende in Chile is more well-known (as was the dictator Pinochet), and the Argentine coup followed others in Uruguay (1973), Bolivia (1974), Peru (1968), Brazil (1964) and several previous ones in Argentina itself (1962, 1966, with an internal military coup in 1970), the dictatorship installed in 1976 was the most sadistic, murderous and cruel of them all. In its brutality and efficiency it was the exemplar of South American authoritarianism.

For people like me–raised in Argentina and directly exposed to the dictatorships of the 1960s and 1970s–the horrors of those days do not go away easily. For a generation of Argentines, to say nothing of their counterparts in Chile and elsewhere such as in Central America, the traumas of those years will linger forever, and it is only now, with the birth of a generation completely unaffected by the dictaduras, that the process of psychological healing can begin in earnest. While people who came of age in the 1960s and 1970s continue living, it will be impossible to erase from the collective memory the pervasive climate of fear that characterised life during those times.

The immediate result of the climate of fear was known as “atomizing infantilisation:” the body politic is forcibly stripped of its horizontal solidarity networks by the imposition of state terror, which paralyses resistance and reduces the individual social subject to the level of a child’s nightmare. Just as children fear the monsters under their beds and are powerless to stop their depredations, so too a society subjected to a systematic campaign of state terror is reduced to a sense of utter helplessness and vulnerability. After all, in the case of the dictatorships, the monsters were real and death or torture could occur at any time, for seemingly any reason. Terror appeared arbitrary but was in fact systematic, with the objective being to break the will of anyone who might oppose the dictatorial project.

The result was a condition of survivalist alienation: people just tried to go about their personal business, retreat into their immediate private lives and avoid trouble by relinquishing public commitments. The Argentines had a phrase for this: “de la casa al trabajo y del trabajo a la casa:” From the house to work and from work to home. Under such conditions there is no collective social subject. There is just submission.

It was under these conditions that the beginnings of the neoliberal macroeconomic experiments began in the Southern Cone. It was not just a matter of outlawing unions and political parties. It was about “cleaning the slate” of all those who could thwart the laboratory experiment that was the imposition of monetarist policies in South America. It was about using the climate of fear to reforge collective identities  so that the working classes would never challenge the primacy of capital again. It was about elites taking advantage of the window of opportunity provided by dictatorship to restructure the economy in a more favourable image, setting in place structural changes that would fundamentally alter class relations and the relationship of the state and society to capital in a way that the latter would always have the dominant say in social life. It was about, in the language of the time, “forcibly extirpating without anesthesia the malignancies of communism, atheism, feminism and homosexuality from the body politic” (the phrase is attributed to Argentine General Benjamin Menendez, who was one of the dictatorship’s most bloodthirsty leaders). In sum, the project was about using systematic application of state terror to sow the seeds of fear, alienation and despair in which market-driven projects could be imposed. Above that, the use of state terror was focused on social cleansing–in Chile it was about eliminating class challenges to capatilist rule. In Argentina it was about preserving an elite way of life. In either case, the dictators stopped at nothing to make their point.

These are the projects from which Roger Douglas, Richard Prebble, Ruth Richardson, John Key and the Business Roundtable take inspiration. These are the models upon which the NZ economic reforms are based. And if we think of the way in which NZ macroeconomic reform and other aspects of social policy have been “reformed,” we can see that the authoritarian example has been emulated in more than the economic realm. In other words, the NZ market “model” is a softer version of the Southern Cone dictatorial projects, absent the repression but with the same thrust.

We should also remember the climate of fear when we observe the Middle East. Populations that have been victimised, brutalised and traumatised by long-standing dictatorships are unlikely to have forgiveness and conciliation on their minds as the dictators begin to tremble. But the dictators and their allies know this, which stiffens their resolve to not suffer the retributions that they richly deserve. That does not easily make for a democratic “spring.”

All of which is to say, when it comes to contemplating the virtues of dictatorial regimes because they provide economic models or security partnerships, the answer in the first instance should be the rallying cry of the heroic Mothers of the Plaza de Mayo: “Nunca Mas!!”

NB: The title of this post comes from Argentine author Miguel Bonasso, who wrote a book by that name.

The Reluctant Ringnut

datePosted on 20:23, March 21st, 2011 by Lew

Since the 5.1 magnitude aftershock on the evening of March 20, various Ringnuts — that is, people who take Ken Ring’s moonie earthquake “predictions” seriously — have been saying things along the lines of “SEE ITS TRUE HE TOLD YOU AND YOU DIDN’T LISTEN!” Their ranks include people who really should know better, who’re revealing that when faced with a bit of smoke and a couple of mirrors they’re as credulous as the next rube.

Such as Brian Edwards, who asks “So – was Ken Ring right or wrong?”, and after arraying a series of banal and rigourless equivocations, attempts to turn scepticism on its head by appealing to the old charlatan’s fallback: cosmic uncertainty, man. We don’t really know anything, so everything’s as good as everything else, man.

The trouble is that Brian’s banal and rigourless equivocations — I’ll not repeat them here — are of a piece with those issued by Ken Ring, and that’s the whole point. Brian tries to have a lazy bob each way on the question of whether Ring is right or wrong. Ring has a bob in each of a dozen different ways, from earthquakes of unspecified magnitude across a very wide area, or possibly a weather event of unspecified nature, occurring in a very broad span of time; or possibly nothing at all. The predictive uselessness these banal and rigourless equivocations have been very thoroughly thrashed out in the past month — notably by David Winter, Alison Campbell [edit to add: and Grant Jacobs]. The punchline is that it would have been a shock if his “prediction”, such as it was, had not “come true”.

What separates the Ringnuts (both the reluctant, who claim the mantle of scepticism, and the True Believers) from the rest of us is the realisation that, given the nature of Ring’s “predictions” it is impossible to answer Brian’s question, “Was Ken Ring right or wrong?”. Ken Ring doesn’t give us a testable prediction, so we can’t even get to the point of assessing its rightness or wrongness. Ken Ring is neither right nor wrong. He doesn’t even get to the point of being wrong, since he hasn’t said anything meaningful.

Given all of this, being wrong would be a considerable improvement for Ken Ring.

L

The Disaster Roulette.

datePosted on 15:57, March 19th, 2011 by Pablo

2011 is shaping up to be a most unhappy year. The seemingly endless parade of human misery caused by the three C’s–calamity, catastrophe and chaos– got me to thinking about which is “worse:” human-caused or natural disasters?

The answer lies in the response. In natural disasters the majority of people band together to work together for the common purpose of overcoming individual and collective hardship and tragedy in pursuit of the common goal of re-establishing normality to the lives. The solidarity exhibited during such times is born of the realisation that nature is a force that cannot be controlled and that no blame can be attributed to it or anything else. It just is, and we live at its mercy. If societies are to thrive, the only response to natural disasters has to be social union and commonality of purpose.

Human disasters, on the other hand, tend to bring out the worst in people. In fact, they are often the product of and the motivation for human cruelty, opportunism and greed. Unlike natural disasters, which are indiscriminate in application, human disasters are discriminate and often deliberate (because even negligence affects some more than others given socio-economic, political and cultural demographics). War and genocide are extreme expressions of human disaster, but the reach of malfeasance is vast and wide. Think of the looting that followed the Iraq occupation or pro-democracy protests in Cairo. Or the cynical use of false information supplied to ISAF forces to settle personal vendettas in Afghanistan. Or the wave of drug-related murders in Mexico (over 35,000 in the last five years) that rides on the back of poverty, ignorance and an unwillingness by consuming societies to recognise the demand aspect of the equation. The same willful blindness and self-serving logics applies to human sex trafficking in SE Asia, which leaves a terrible toll of human and social costs in its wake but which is allowed, even encouraged, by states simply because it channels sexual predation to foreign localised areas (such as Thailand, which is the recipient of well-advertised sex tours from countries such as Japan and Germany). Then there are the corporate disasters ranging from the tobacco industry’s lying about the effects of smoking to lax safety regulations at chemical plants in places like Bophal to the manipulation of financial derivatives by bankers that produced the global financial crisis of 2008-present and which exacted a terrible toll in lost jobs, lost homes and, in some countries, lost public benefits imposed by austerity measures prescribed by the very people who caused the crisis in the first place.

If my view is correct then the answer is clear: human disasters are “worse” than natural disasters.

But there is another scenario that brings the worst of both together: where human folly has magnified the impact of a negative natural event. That may be the case in Japan. If it turns out that concerns about nuclear safety standards were ignored or covered up by power company operators in the years before this year’s earthquake and tsunami, and/or that they are currently downplaying the gravity of the situation in an effort to save face, then the current nuclear crisis is a human add-on to what otherwise is a terrible but surmountable natural disaster. The same is true if it turns out that the supposedly “earthquake-proof” buildings in countries with known fault lines have not been built to code due to corruption or cost-cutting (this is especially true for states located with the Ring of Fire earthquake zone and Central Asia where such standards, if they exist, are haphazardly enforced). I use these two examples because they are in the news at present, but the list of instances where human failures worsened the negative impact of a natural event is long. As for the bible-bashers who place blame on victimised societies because of their supposed failures to adhere to God’s teachings: the less said the better, but they too add unnecessary suffering to those already in distress.

In sum, it seems to me that natural disasters are tragedies for which humanity is socially hard-wried to cope. Human disasters are worse because they promote self-centred advantage-taking, meanness and division rather than solidarity and unity. Human and natural disasters combined are the most calamitous of all because the presence of the former compounds and exacerbates the problem while making more difficult a common response to the latter.

All of which is to say, if I have to spin the disaster wheel given where I live, I bet on natural causes and prepare accordingly (easier to do in NZ than in SG, which is another reason to return home). However, should I ever again live in a conflict zone or where corporate and/or political corruption abounds (and that could well be most of the world), then I will hedge my bets with a human disaster contingency plan as well.

White Queen

datePosted on 15:17, March 17th, 2011 by Lew

Andrew Geddis has a good post up on Pundit about Hilary Calvert and her apparent ignorance of the Humpty Dumpty scene from Through the Looking-Glass.

The extent of Calvert’s idiocy being so egregious, it seems a mite churlish to point out — in addition to failures of basic logic and lawyerly literary culture — the flaws of historical and legal reasoning in her now-famous speech on the foreshore and seabed topic. But Calvert dug her own pit when she wittered on about tangata whenua “crawling on the seabed” like some sort of primitive bottom-dwelling life forms, holding their breath for the better part of two centuries, and the length of a cannon-shot — and the following can’t go unmentioned. Despite being a big-city property lawyer, Hilary Calvert apparently hasn’t done the first bit of research into the basic legal history of this particular property-rights debate. The Muriwhenua report of the Waitangi Tribunal (Wai 22), one of the mechanisms which resulted in fishery rights being vested in various iwi (the “Sealord deal”), is a very well-known and documented case, and covered the matter of indigenous control of coastal waters in considerable detail. Its findings were robust, and were summarised as follows in the report of the Foreshore & Seabed Review Panel:

The Tribunal, which heard detailed evidence on that particular district, concluded that there was an ‘inner’ zone related to the continental shelf, stretching 12 miles out from shore. The hapū and tribes of Muriwhenua had full control over fishing and passage inside that zone. They claimed the same rights further out, but only insofar as they could be enforced against challengers. In the ‘Māori idiom the hapū and tribes of Muriwhenua held the “mana” or “authority” of the whole of the Muriwhenua seas’ within a minimum of the 12-mile zone. The nearest British cultural equivalent, the Tribunal found, ‘is to consider that they exercised “dominion” over that part, or “owned” it as part of their territorial waters’. We accept this view that Māori tribes had dominion over their territorial waters as at 1840, and that in the particular circumstances of the Muriwhenua district, it extended for at least 12 miles out to sea.

So neither Calvert nor anyone in the ACT research unit who checks speeches for accuracy (yeah, permit me a little poetic liberty) has even read the definitive public document from which this replacement law has emerged — let alone attained even a passing familiarity with the basic historical situation which underpins the argument around customary property rights to the coastal marine area. ACT don’t even understand the legal situation regarding the foreshore and seabed review; they oppose it viscerally, without even really knowing or thinking about why. Let me be clear: there are good reasons to oppose the passage of this bill. Although I don’t personally agree, I’ll even go so far as to say that there could be good, principled reasons to oppose this bill because it goes too far in compensating tangata whenua. The reasons being stated by ACT in general and Hilary Calvert in particular are not such reasons, by any meaningful standard.

ACT’s position prior to this week was bad enough; this week it has degenerated into farce. In Through the Looking-Glass the White Queen believes six impossible things before breakfast, and lives in backwards, looking-glass time. On the basis of this performance one has to wonder whether Calvert, once apparently a pretty sharp operator, is finding that her faculties of critical and professional reasoning are becoming atrophied. Though, as someone on Danyl’s blog remarked yesterday, it pays to remember that she was ranked below David Garrett on the party list.

L

Shame on the Herald

datePosted on 08:36, March 17th, 2011 by Lew

… for trying to run game on New Zealand, scaremongering the Foreshore and Seabed hīkoi:

That was on page four of the dead tree edition, and online here, under the headline “Opponents put up roadblocks to bill”. Use of this outrageously unrepresentative photo makes a number of unjustified implications which aren’t present in Claire Trevett’s generally factual and balanced article. These include:

  • Most obviously, the suggestion that the marchers are gang members, with the implication of violence and public menace that creates, despite the fact that the march was peaceful having been mentioned in the opening sentence of Trevett’s article;
  • Creation of a general equivalence between Māori protesters and gang members, with all the racism that implies;
  • The suggestion that opponents of the foreshore and seabed legislation are acting on a separatist “black power” imperative, when the article makes clear that the opponents mentioned in the headline are an ideological grab-bag consisting of the ACT and Green parties, and Hone Harawira;
  • The suggestion that the marchers are literally blocking roads, when the article makes clear that the roadblocks referred to in the headline are metaphorical, and little more than the usual sort of procedural delaying tactics employed in Parliament to drag out the progress of a bill — in this case until next week, when the hīkoi reaches Wellington.

The core message of this choice of photo to accompany what is mostly a story about the trivial frustrations of a government trying to pass an unpopular law is this: Māori radicals and gangs are forcibly blocking this law, and they will block you from the beach as well.

It would be absurd if it wasn’t so offensively misleading.

(via Pascal’s bookie)

L

Gulp!

datePosted on 08:36, March 16th, 2011 by Lew

ACT MP and lawyer Hilary Calvert, on the Marine & Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Bill, in Parliament last night:

“Historical use of the seabed any significant distance from the shore seems impossible to prove, and allowing for title over it to be granted over it to iwi allows for unjust and potentially divisive future claims. No one historically crawled about on the seabed miles from shore. There was just no chance of anybody holding their breath from 1840 til now on the seabed. It’s not gonna happen.

(My emphasis.)

Once again, I think we all owe a debt of gratitude to the ACT party for illustrating so plainly to us what — and how — they really think.

L

Revealed preference

datePosted on 21:27, March 14th, 2011 by Lew

Former National leader Don Brash addressed the ACT party conference at the weekend, which was half “catching Australia” boilerplate and half a warming-over of the infamous “nationhood” speech given at Orewa in January 2004 (for a thorough rebuttal of which see Jon Johansson, Orewa and the Rhetoric of Illusion). During his address at the weekend (although no mention is made of this in the text of the speech on his website, linked above), Brash correctly stated that the Treaty of Waitangi was ahead of its time, because the contemporary Australian approach, by contrast, was to “shoot the natives”.

At this point, a heckler in the audience piped up: “let’s bring it in“. (Audio).

Moments like these, when people are put in the position of genuinely involuntary response to some stimulus or other, are pretty rare in a political environment dominated by strict stage-management, spin and counter-spin. Their type and quality can tell you a whole lot about a political movement, especially when the response is collective, spontaneous, and embedded within a heightened or aroused political context, such as in the middle of a keynote speech.

What happened next was that the delegates in attendance at the ACT party laughed. At the suggestion that New Zealand implement a system of genocide against its indigenous people which, even back in 1840, was a source of shame for Australia, those in attendance at the annual conference of a New Zealand government party whose ranks include two ministers of the crown laughed. It is hard to be sure from the audio, but it sounds like Don Brash also laughed — someone on-mike did, and in such circumstances only the speaker is miked. Quickly, the laughs turned to disapproving murmurs, and Brash continued speaking as if nothing had happened. But by then the moment was over — the ACT delegates’ true colours had been revealed.

Not all of them, to be sure. No doubt there were those who were agape at the suggestion. Stony, stunned silence from the delegation at large would certainly have been an appropriate response and one which I don’t think would have been too hard to muster. Eric Crampton has suggested (though I suspect he’s by no means committed to this line of argument) that nervous laughter is a fair response to shock; admitting also that nobody seems to be claiming that the laughter was nervous. Eric also placed one in five odds on the heckler being a ringer whose plan was to elicit just this sort of response, in order to discredit the ACT party. Fair enough, I suppose. But it’s not the heckle itself which was disturbing — every party contains its fringe lunatics, those who fly off the handle and say embarrassing things. What’s disturbing is the response, the spontaneous, reflexive, collective reaction to the suggestion of genocide.

Just as Labour are the party of humourless, tuneless harridans after their “John the Gambler” song at the 2008 annual conference, and the Greens are the party of morris dancing hippies because of their 2001 annual conference, the fundamental take-away here is that ACT is the party who laughs at genocide jokes. The ACT delegates own that moment of laughter, just as much as they own the disapproval which followed it. It’s not even out of character for a party which has for some years now campaigned on the basis of arguments that indigenous people represent barriers to the white man’s progress, and was at the time of the interjection revelling in a sustained argument to that very effect: get rid of the bloody natives, and things’ll be a lot easier around here, and then we might catch up with Australia, who solved their bloody native problem good and proper. It speaks to the core beliefs of those in attendance, and what’s more, it largely reiterates what most peoples’ impressions of the ACT party are, based on their rhetoric, their policy positions, and their steadfast opposition to every bit of legislation giving the slightest acknowledgement to Tino Rangatiratanga.

Whether a ringer or an organic outgrowth from the party delegation, whether speaking his own truth to power or having just had a few too many free glasses of capitalist sauvignon, the people of New Zealand are indebted to this anonymous heckler. He has granted the nation a unique insight into the ACT party, and rare basis upon which to judge its underlying character. That’s good for democracy.

L

12Next