great results accutane cost 2.5 mg tablets tadalafil cipla india can take viagra australia clomid pct buy nolvadex and clomid stack the states hersteller von viagra generika metformin atid zusammensetzung is zithromax safe to buy online bringing tadalafil from mexico to canada what is doxycycline called in mexico propecia and rogaine together results crocs baya lined womens reviews on cialis lasix 40 mg half life canadian suoer active viagra can i take levaquin and doxycycline together ciprofloxacine 500 mg metformin 500 mg buy online how long does cialis 10 mg last tadalafil 40mg cheap canada pharmacy best prices online cialis saniprostol finasteride 5 mg tadacip 20 mg tadalafil 20mg tab inderal 10 mg and prednisone cipro buy online is tamoxifen the same as nolvadex cialis in argentina lasix tablets dosage ampicillin dose during pregnancy viagra capsule price in pakistan iphone g.e.metformin hcl 500 mg tablet what dosage of doxycycline for uti doxycycline periodontal dosage viagra tablets prise in pakistan viagra generico 150 antidepressants 75 mg zoloft generic viagra with free shipping cialis 20 mg 100 tablets cialis with dapoxetine reviews on garcinia lh and fsh ratio in pcos metformin agua de monchique donde comprar viagra pfizer viagra online cheap tadalafil dosage forms generic nolvadex bertibarots doxycycline hyclate 100 mg substitution can viagra cause gout best way to stop taking propecia hong kong cialis over the counter doxycycline dose for canine kennel cough josef seibel cipro amoxil 500 mg can. it cause a miscarriage can you take penicillin and viagra viagra online shopping australia compare handbags online india cheap generic viagra grinder reviews herbal viagra finasteride generico original is tadalafil 100mg safe heracillin 750 mg biverkningar av metformin doxycycline price increase shortage where is viagra sold in nigeria sildenafil 20 mg pharmacokinetics ppt prednisone 20mg to buy zovirax 2 mg dapoxetine uk pharmacy requirements clomidex ingredients in benadryl buy propecia online in usa prednisone hexal 20mg 50 mg adderall viagra bestilling price comparison for pfizer viagra donde y como comprar cytotec wo bestellt ihr eure viagra sale of finasteride 1mg in nigeria prednisone 5 mg indications for colonoscopy how to viagra online buy viagra for women cheap price of viagra compared to cialis the cost of clomid without insurance viagra buy in bangladesh can i take excedrin with clomid metformin xr 500mg sa tablets walmart cost of propranolol without insurance cost zithromax 20 mg of cialis is not making me hard enough zithromax 500 mg precious lord long does take cialis 5 mg work terazosin 5 mg indicaciones metformina prezzo cialis originale in farmacia popular cialis 200 mg india doxycycline treatment malaria oxynorm instant 5 mg bijsluiter nolvadex female cialis online prescriptions with no membership vibramycin hereisthebestin australia buy mifepristone and cytotec online dose how long after i eat should i take viagra stopping zoloft 100mg price quien invento el viagra where can i buy clomid online in cape town metohexal 95 mg 12 5mg cialis neurology dementia specialists in md tadalafil drug interactions cialis online melbourne can you buy viagra out of pub toilets donde comprar cytotec tijuana indian herbal viagra retail in malaysia can you buy viagra over the counter holland doxycycline dosage soft tissue infection where to buy viagras from over the counter como puedo comprar viagra por internet viagra online bestellen ohne rezept erfahrungen cialis canadian phamacy 200 mg cialis dosage lasix in hypercalcemia the effects of metformin in breastfeeding roche takes accutane off market buy discount viagra online is propecia otc in canada how much zovirax cost 400mg where can i purchase zithromax zithromax treats what bacteria is in yogurt does viagra come in pink triangle tablets cost of cialis 5 mg walmart viagra in cosmuzel viagra liquidian difference between tadacip and tadalafil sildenafil bnf price doxycycline dose for syphilis treatment what happens if you go in the sun while taking cipro no rx lasix lidocaine over the counter substitute for viagra generic viagra 24 h propranolol and paroxetine uk clomid 50 mg opinie fertility clinic london clomid for sale generic viagra rosebud voli milano cipro low cost herbal viagra review comprar viagra andorra sin receta bisuteria how often to take cialis 20 nurofen 400 mg bijsluiter viagra where to buy zovirax online redeem cialis voucher online pharmacy cialis buy online canada prednisone 5 mg ivf pregnancy viagra in mexico prise 5mg generic cialise propecia uk licence quick buy viagra in france ipledge accutane canada viagra tablets in malaysia viagra in hongkong kaufen cara menjadi pengusaha sukses dari nolvadex diflucan fluconazole in pregnancy can i take motrin while on clomid doxycycline 200 mg nedir how long dose it take to get cialis in your system viagra sale prices what cold medicine is safe with prednisone complaints about generic glucophage zovirax safe during pregnancy viagra causa parada cardiaca anyone order viagra from canada falabellas for sale in uk zithromax come si usa il diflucan is it hard to get on accutane diclofenac potasico 50 mg calox sildenafil cheap cialis women how many mg of doxycycline to take generic viagra reviews message board qual o efeito do cialis de 20 mg 2 different pills in cialis bottle viagra spray price in pakistan of anti will amoxil 500 mg help a uti obat profertil 50 mg viagra cytotec price in pakistan iphone metformin 500 mg srl apo verap 80 mg prednisone is viagra a scheduled drug best way to use metformin zoloft surreal feeling meaning nome do generico do viagra price of propecia in korea why take finasteride slow taper for 40 mg prednisone sildenafil price in usa stockist of viagra in mumbai best price generic cialismade in india viagra payment option paypal generico do viagra araujo farmacia how long does prednisolone stay in body viagra prices in indian rupees break 100 mg zoloft in half zovirax 800 mg gsk brand in india revista online com br fusca e cialis buy the best priligy cipro resistance in india avon grove library viagra online when to take metformin twice a day cialis pharmacy price in canada viagra ciudad real is metformin and glycomet same buy clomid serophene online cialis rezeptfrei in schweiz ciprofloxacin order azithromycin 1gm vildagliptin metformin india daily dosage of doxycycline reviews on natural viagra can you take hcg with clomid buy viagra in moscow viagra 50 mg online kaufen where to buy cialis in new york doxycycline 50 mg sinus infection brand inderal la cipro 500 mg prix tunisie cipro hc otic how many drops in 1ml nexium 40 mg 14 comprimidos viagra sildenafil de 20 mg where buy viagra in delhi viagra super force generic cialis cialis in thailandia ampicillin dosage mg viagra pillen kopen doxycycline 50 mg acne dosage for doxycycline what can i buy instead of viagra over the counter viagra walgreens lantanon generic viagra krb5krb err generic viagra cialis dose size cheapest price on cialis zithromax cost with i cipro hcl 500 mg for sale without could you put viagra in water metformin associated lactic acidosis review33 viagra and organic nitrates chemistry pain in side after taking clomid chinese viagra in malaysia muerto por sobredosis de viagra online buy viagra online in new zealand dosage amoxil suspension for 5 yrs old 125 mg inderal generic drug zovirax dergboadre canada how much accutane cost without insurance order viagra online using paypal how far in advance to take cialis viagra windsor canada viagra buying in canada can you get female viagra over the counter tadalafil powder 100g prices ciprofloxacin wiki indo europeans where to get viagra in beijing online herbal club viagra 100 clomid pcos pregnancy zovirax mercury price viagra tablets in hindi viagra australian actress robbie doxycycline and ciprofloxacin together viagra in india hyderabad prednisone manufacturers in india can you buy amoxilin at boots uk medicinali generici cialis information costo viagra farmacias prednisone taper pack order without a prescription when is the best time to take accutane morning or night viagra for men in montreal buy propecia online malaysia viagra senza prescrizione in farmacia how much it cost for viagra in south africa how much is propecia at walmart super hard on sildenafil generic contraindicaciones para el uso del viagra online why use doxycycline hyclate 100mg zithromax available in south africa pharmacie place monge cialis over the counter minoxidil and propecia together in india wal finite generic for zoloft viagra from indian company arraylist to array generics for viagra generic cialis available in india dose of iv sildenafil in neonates cialis generika wirkung madecassol cream generico de cialis comprar viagra yahoo propecia guercmorteo reviews cialis prescribing information australia taking clomid not getting pregnant reviews sildenafil 20 mg reviews lasix amp 20 mg good viagra tablets buy sildenafil europe viagra in malta shop doxycycline staph dosage acitretin capsules ip 25 mg of zoloft milk and zithromax cost of viagra in costa rica pharmacies does cialis really work for 24 hours clomid free delivery where i can buy pfizer viagra in delhi how likely is it to get pregnant on clomid what is the average price of accutane accutane depression rate in the united genuine cialis in australia kamagra generic viagra 100 mg sildenafil effectiveness of zithromax for chlamydia is sildenafil mankind 100 is safe finasteride price in australia difference between amoxil and augmentin where can i get viagra in kuala lumpur man in hospital after injecting viagra cytotec tqeovertoz discount pharmacies in johannesburg selling clomid donde comprar cialis venezuela food doxycycline hyclate used for bronchitis torsemide teva 14cpr 10 mg prednisone caverta sildenafil citrate 50 mg viagra 100mg vs 50 mg were can i buy womens viagra in liverpool weight loss due to accutane generic herbal viagra pills ukc can we take 40 mg cialis viagra genericssouth africa cialis 20 mg break lasix wholesale flowers clomid when to take ovulation test 2 month course of accutane cost cytotec peru donde comprar viagra role of prednisone in chemo viagra name brand online is viagra ever 200 mg comprare cialis generico a roma cialis brand 10mg sale without rx la pela tadalafil 20mg 28 viagra generic benzo fury buy online uk viagra finasteride buying how long does it take for diflucan to work in men cytotec for sale in davao city there generic clomid price compared to viagra staxyn genericviagramastercardpayment genericviagrawithoutvisa generic mexico viagra safer lexapro zoloft cialis one time dose como debo usar el viagra canadian viagra sales bodybuilding best place to order clomid doxycycline or malarone best buying cialis in abu dhabi buy online securely viagra sildenafil de 100mg viagra generico dal 22 giugno nolano anavar with propecia safe or not hypernatremia in a pt on iv lasix corticosteroids prednisone pregnancy test inderal 80 mg retard alert buy viagra online cheap uk short zoloft weight gain australia comprar viagra jet drinking on 20 mg accutane a day how many mg of doxycycline for std secondo ciclo clomid for sale glimepiride 2mg metformin 500mg in cipla web ampicillin dose renal impairment cytotec is safe for abortion glucophage 1000 mg fiyat 150 carry viagra in luggage donde comprar viagra en rancagua prix de zithromax au maroc uses of metformin in weight loss vitusapotek cialis need prescription other viagra like pills viagra for men in india in delhi vimovo nombre generico de amoxil is there any viagra for man in bangladesh order overnight prednisone no prescription generic cialis dailys buy instagram likes fastest delivery of viagra viagra online switzerland buy doxycycline with paypal prix cialis 20mg espagne viagra gold bestellen viagra without prescriptions in hyderabad propecia hair pills como se usa cytotec embarazo online viagra 25mg viagra falls nyc reviews prednisone and cefdinir donde puedo comprar cytotec en bogota colombia para que sirve inderal 10 mg does lasix come in 10mg tablets low t specialist in st louis mo best viagra alternative otc reset tablet generic a viagra do you need a prescription for viagra in mexico online clomid bestellen cialis generic buy without credit card buy laetrile tablets 500 mg metformin sex during clomid use viagra industry in ireland generic clomid success rate generic prednisone 10mg pack viagra generika rezeptfrei kaufen where europe buy viagra without prescription vibrox doxycycline reviews cialis o viagra generico vega sildenafil citrate tablets 100 inderal 10 mg indications for albuterol is viagra still patented in saudi arabia zithromax tablets 500mg price in india dapoxetine online review generic propecia price compare can you get in the sun while taking prednisone cialis daily use strength name buy viagra text buy viagra hemangioma in infants propranolol 40mg what time do i take viagra buy 40 mg accutane online liquid cialis proper dosges how to tell the difference between real viagra n fake accutane and hypothyroidism sildenafil generico brazil philippine cost of doxycycline 100mg amoxil whartisthebestin overnight safe viagra paypal accepted doxycycline available brands in chennai how long does viagra stays in the body cialis when to take it buy nolvadex kroger when to use lasix is cialis used to treat high blood pressure ci cipro garage for sale canadian prescription s cialis australian viagra indian sildenafil tablets 100mg viagra 25mg preis low dose accutane studies cialis 20 mg cost treat hyponatremia lasix can you pay for generic viagra with your hsa should doxycycline be taken on an empty stomach finasteride 1 mg en mexico cheap cialis in melbourne i took 40 milligrams of generic cialis benuron generico do viagra can i take two 5mg cialis is propecia otc in canada hvad er brand viagra whats comparable to clomid over the counter comprar viagra y cialis contrareembolso how much does 20mg cialis cost where can i find viagra in seoul female viagra holland barrett oppbygging av eukaryote generic viagra doxycycline to treat urinary tract infections generico do zovirax creme medicine premature ejaculation dapoxetine how long does it take to get accutane prescribed accidentally took 200 mg doxycycline lyme viagra recreational use how to generic finasteride 1mg vs propecia dosage les generiques du viagra for sale viagra dosage reviews cialis cost daily dose is viagra from india good effects of viagra on a healthy male sildenafil actavis 100 mg bestellen canada pharmacy buy viagra i purchased viagra generic cialis overnight novo lexin tab 500 mg metformin para que sirve el ciprofloxacino cinfa 500 mg buying clomid in germany buy zovirax in europe whats cheaper viagra or cialis acquistare cialis generico org doxycycline and dry eye treatment real cialis online price of cialis in philippines where i can by propecia in toronto alendronate versus generics for viagra where in melbourne can i buy viagra herbal viagra for women australia voglibose metformin brands in india how to take clomid 2013 cheap generi cviagra india non prescription viagra online uk next day delivery what is prednisone used for in people efectos secundarios ciprofloxacina 500 mg doxycycline as antimalarial dosage sildenafil tablets ip 100 mg recreational cost of 25 mg viagra how can i get clomid without prescription amoxihexal 1000 mg filmtabletten nebenwirkungen viagra generic form of zovirax can you take cialis with diabetes how many mg propecia should i take letrozole vs clomid pct for sale normal lab values for lasix buy inderal la 80 mg que causan las pastillas cytotec tadalafil in pflanzen buying viagra canadian metformin contraindicated in congestive heart failure Kiwipolitico » 2009 » September
Archive for ‘September, 2009’

Conservatives speak a different language

datePosted on 21:47, September 29th, 2009 by Pascals Bookie

… and often I don’t understand it.

Pretty much every time I see the term ‘Social Engineering’ used I think the writer has got it backwards.

Mark Krikorian writes in a short post at NRO’s corner blog:

As John O’Sullivan wrote years ago in NR, if different groups of Americans had children at different rates, resulting in changes in the ethnic (or religious or whatever) composition of the nation, that’s nobody’s business one way or the other. But mass immigration, especially in the context of the low fertility levels that are inherent to modernity, represents social engineering in its purest form, the elite’s decision to dissolve the people and elect a new one. Instead, how about we leave social engineering to the ChiComs and just let today’s American moms and dads decide what tomorrow’s America will be like.

(emphasis mine).

Leaving aside the merits of the US immigration debate and other aspects of Krikorian’s post*, I find the use of ‘social engineering’ here to be fascinating. I understand his point well enough, (and I’d rather not dwell on it), but what grabs me is that social engineering here can only mean the actions of his opponents, it could never be applied to his own policy. It’s a code of some sort, it no longer means just what the words say.

Obviously much of what governments do is social engineering of one sort or another. The criminal justice system is in place largely to deter and punish behaviours. Taxes are used to encourage some activities over others and so on. These sorts of things are never termed social engineering though. SE is almost always a bad thing. This much I can understand and be quite comfortable with. Whatever ‘social engineering’ is, it’s something that goes against freedom, and we are all liberals now pretty much, with the arguments being about how best to maximise (and define) liberty.

What I don’t understand is that whenever the term is actually used nowadays, it seems to be aimed at policies that remove some aspect of State control over the shape of society. In the example above, Krikorian seems to be saying that open borders would be an extreme example of social engineering. To me that is precisely wrong. A strict immigration policy, aimed at keeping a nations demographics in some sort of racial or cultural stasis would be a far better fit for the label ‘social engineering’. Given what the words mean.

If the US government was forcibly dragging non-white immigrants to the US in order to deliberately alter the demograhic mix, or refusing white applicants entry, then he’d have a point. That would meet the natural definition for SE. But they aren’t doing anything like that.

The same applies to arguments around gay marriage and state recognition of de-facto relationships. Surely when the state is recognising the relationships that people have, and not discriminating between them, then that is the opposite of what the words ‘social engineering’ actually mean.

And on the contrary, when the state did discriminate on those grounds and deliberately favoured some relationships over others, (and even made some relationships illegal), in order to foster a particular style of domestic arrangement that was felt to be most beneficial for society, then that is, quite precisely, ‘social engineering’.

So is all this just projection on the part of conservatives, or are they adding (or subtracting) some meaning to the term that I’m not seeing?

* I’ll just say that his links are interesting, as are the uses he puts them to.

When the odious get onerous.

datePosted on 21:40, September 28th, 2009 by Pablo

After a short week overseas I came back to find myself involved over the weekend in another argument about blog etiquette. It started out when I read Not PC’s post on  a troll. The issue basically boils down to the fact that one particularly nasty right wing frother (think Jesse Helms channeling Joe McCarthy and Glen Beck, but without the charm of either; to wit: racist, homophobic, foul-mouthed and pig ignorant)–who in the spirit of things we shall call “ratbuggered–” did enough to get himself banned and named by the blog owner. I weighed in on the side of the owner in the comments section, even while noting that here at KP we have put ratbuggered on auto-moderation so as to see if he has anything reasonable to say (so far he has not), and that as practice we do not “out” people who we have had trouble with (even though we have the ability to identify them). I noted that there are no universal laws or code of ethics preventing the outing of individuals using pseudonyms on blogs, for whatever reasons the blog owners may choose. There was much to and fro in the comments section, including from ratbuggered himself (who apparently lives in Tauranga. I shall leave you to draw conclusions).

The argument got picked up at No Minister, and things got pretty heated in the comments section. I weighed in some more, in further depth, arguing that market logics should determine blog traffic and that the blogosphere was ( come to think of it, like the Hobbesian “state of nature” that realists see to be the basic structure  of international relations) a self-enforcing society with no universal values or ethics (even if some may share implicit ethical constraints and some others may develop mutually binding rules of conduct)). For that I got robustly vilified by ratbuggered and his ideological soulmates (including the No Minister contributor aptly calling himself “Adolf”). I lot of it was name-calling rather than counter-argument.

What did surface as a counter-argument was amusing. Apparently these champions of free speech, liberty, freedom and individualism–the same ones who delighted in the outing of the two beneficiaries by Paula Bennett a few weeks back–believe that it is “unethical” to name an unwanted and repeatedly intrusive troll once all other appeals for him to desist have failed. PC weighed in as well and the entire argument turned into a circus. Rather than try to repeat myself and capture what others said, I urge you to read the entire thread as it is quite entertaining.

What it confirms in my mind, besides the fact that ratbuggered lives in a parallel Strangelovian universe that can only cause one to pity anyone sharing his household (should that even be feasible), is how hypocritical some of the rightwingers are. They love the free market when it suits them, but step on any of their self-righteous beliefs with market arguments and their closet social authoritarian viscerally jumps out. Ratbuggered is clearly an armchair bully and coward of no consequence (and is, indeed, a troll of the first order), but it sure is wild to see  some of the blogging right turn against markets, choice and individual responsibility when these run counter to their preferred view of the world.

All in all it was glimpse into a netherworld of unreason and hatred that, like plane crashes and train wrecks, is morbidly fascinating if intellectually terminal. Although I do not agree with most of Not PC’s political views, at least his is a reasoned discourse, which is precisely why ratbuggered found no haven on his blog. May the same occur here, regardless of the ideological persuasion of the commentariat.

Democratising democracy

datePosted on 19:09, September 28th, 2009 by Lew

Speaking of headlines, that’s a good one from OpenLeft.org.uk. And an interesting article, too, by British Labour MP James Purnell, which touches on a few things I’ve been thinking about recently.

Purnell identifies three initial steps toward fulfilling Lincoln’s “of the people, by the people, for the people” ideal of democracy in British politics, and to a large extent these also apply in NZ.

First, embracing a more open politics. We need a much wider range of people becoming MPs.

Measures to ensure that the political process is not the sole domain of political elites.

Second, deepening our representative democracy.

Constitutional and electoral reform to abolish the vestiges of aristocratic privilege and making elections more proportional and representative.

Third, broadening our democratic society to make people powerful and enable people to achieve more together than we do alone.

Decentralising the political process and civic institutions and decoupling politics from financial elites.

There’s much more than that, and a lot of concrete suggestions around how these lofty goals might be achieved, why they ought to be. Although I don’t agree with all of it (it equates ‘democracy’ with ‘anti-elitism’ which is problematic) and think some is a bit glib (it’s an MP flattering the electorate, after all), it’s certainly worth a read.

L

Headline battle!

datePosted on 17:25, September 28th, 2009 by Lew

LingLingBattleWithin a half-hour, the two leading trumpet-blowers of the blogosphere have favoured us with their interpretations of the latest developments in the Bill English accomodation saga, and their headlines are marvellous. Both are factual; neither contain any misleading or false information, and yet they convey such different things.

First (chronologically), in the red corner: The Standard:

English admits he’s been rorting us

  • “English”, formal, invoking his role and status as a public personage and the head of a noted family (who also benefit from the ‘rort’).
  • “admits”, an implied concession of wrongdoing (even though English’s statement — not linked or substantively quoted in the post– makes quite clear that he’s conceding nothing of the sort).
  • “he” and “us”, an active phrasing emphasising the power dynamic in play, in which “we” are being exploited by “him”.
  • “rorted”, a hugely fashionable term in these parts nowadays (a fact on which someone recently wrote an interesting article; can anyone remember who?). It’s a strong, colourful term redolent of the back-slapping corruptness of entitlement, viewed as harmless and trivial by those privileged few who, by dint of social station, connections or wealth are able to perpetrate it, and as an insufferable reminder of greedy injustice by those not so able. This is the word it all hangs on: it provokes the visceral reaction of disgust, and divides the “him” from the “us”.
  • “[has] been” and the past tense throughout, focusing on what has happened. In some ways represents a softening: he has been, but he isn’t any more. But in the wider context this emphasises the ongoing nature of the campaign against English, an unspoken “see, we were right all along, and we have forced this admission” — again, despite the fact that English claims there’s no such admission. Being backward-looking, it focuses on the matter of principle, not of practice; it doesn’t matter that he paid the proceeds of his rort back, what matters is that he rorted it in the first place.

And in the blue corner, Kiwiblog:

Bill pays back allowance

  • Parsimonious, omitting a part of speech which in this case would bear important information, leaving the question open: “his” allowance? “the” allowance? We don’t know if the author thinks he has a right to it or not. It’s just “allowance”.
  • “Bill”, informal, emphasising his individuality and personal characteristics rather than social roles or position. Familiarity suggests reliability, trustworthiness.
  • “pays back”, active phrasing indicating Bill’s volition — he was not forced into anything, he did it of his own accord. Also echoes the Nats’ favoured cat-call of the past half-decade: “pay it back!”, first directed at Helen Clark, then at Winston Peters, a clear delineation drawn because Bill is paying it back and they didn’t.
  • “allowance”, something one is allowed. As in the other headline, this is the word it all hangs on. Its use implicitly disclaims any wrongdoing; because it’s impossible to ‘rort’ an ‘allowance’ by definition, this begs the question of whether Bill is, in fact, allowed it.
  • “pays” and use of present tense throughout, focusing on the future rather than the past, practicalities rather than principles, actions and consequences rather than character or trustworthiness. No harm, no foul, right?

With headlines like this, why would you even need to read the article — or the actual statement?

L

Sue Bradford: hampered by her own effectiveness

datePosted on 20:33, September 25th, 2009 by Lew

I haven’t had a chance to read much of the matter written about Sue Bradford’s resignation today, so I apologise if I duplicate things other, wiser, faster people have said.

Sue will probably not appreciate the comparison, but she is like Roger Douglas in a way — too effective at driving a radical agenda for an orthodox political establishment to fully tolerate. Even the Greens, who for all their activist trimmings are essentially integral to the orthodox political establishment, and looking likely to become more so under the leadership of Russel Norman and Metiria Turei. As with Rogernomics, the s59 repeal was a powerfully controversial agenda against which popular opinion is strongly united. Unlike Rogernomics, though, it’s not so much because of the policy’s specific impacts (which are minimal) as the rhetoric around it which have proven poisonous. Sue made the bill her own and took a staunch position on it, and with a few exceptions (notably including Helen Clark, who also made the bill her own by adopting it as a government bill [turns out it remained a member’s bill throughout, thanks Graeme]) she was allowed to stand alone on the issue, one person drawing the sort of fire which would ordinarily be directed at a party or coalition of parties. She drew it, took it, and saw the bill through to its conclusion.

And that’s the problem; people don’t like the policy — or rather, they don’t like the idea of the policy — and as far as they’re concerned Sue Bradford is the policy.

Sue Bradford is an extremely effective advocate and a powerful organiser, but she is not the person to lead a party whose central policy plank — climate change and environmental sustainability — is ascending ever more rapidly into political orthodoxy. She is the sort of person any party would want as a #3; someone who works like a demon, is ethically above reproach, has phenomenal networks, whose credentials and commitment can be relied upon, and who has the gumption to see things through to their conclusions. She will go far; we will see and hear as much of her in the coming years as we have of people like Laila Harre and Geoffrey Palmer. But because of her forthrightness and personal investment in the s59 repeal, to elect her to the co-leadership would have struck a critical blow to the Greens’ political credibility and branded them as an activist party without a cause. They have a cause: environmentalism. Other aspects of their policy agenda are important adjuncts to that, but they are just that, adjuncts. The Greens have a great opportunity to make themselves indispensable to future governments who need to be environmentally credible, but they need to focus on doing that.

What of the other parties? Despite her strength as a champion, I don’t think the other parties on the right will be thrilled with Sue’s departure. The Greens’ credibility (and the inability to howl about nanny state lesbians for distraction purposes) is their loss, not their gain. The other parties on the left, likewise, although this change is important in that it enables Labour and the Greens to more clearly delineate themselves from one another. This opens the way to a model of left politics such as I have described; Labour as the core, with the Greens as an independent but allied environmentalist party, with very little crossover. It has potential, although it relies on Labour desisting from the current notion that it can be all things to all people, and the Greens’ former notions of activism as an end, rather than a means.

L

Bleg: what do people want in an electoral system?

datePosted on 20:10, September 22nd, 2009 by Lew

I wrote most of this before DPF’s post on the threshold, including his link to Chris Bishop’s handy paper on representation and stability went up, so read that first. In fact, you’d also do very well to look over BK Drinkwater’s series comparing electoral systems: noise, wastage, proportionality, and a critique of some critiques of SM, although note that the SM numbers assume a 70-50 electorate-list split as per our MMP system at present. This is good from an apples-apples perspective, even if it’s not an option that’s actually on the table. I also wrote it before my more-recent post on the topic, for which some people have begun offering their preferred electoral modifications. Wonderful!


Much like the subtext to the s59 referendum question was ‘do you like the anti-smacking bill?’, the question above lurks behind the forthcoming debate on MMP, for which the troops are currently massing.

The likeliest contender, in my view, is the retention of MMP as we have it now, with a 5% threshold and a 70-50 split. Other less-likely contenders, again in my view, are as follows:

  • STV, as employed in some local body elections and for the Australian Senate.
  • SM, as apparently favoured by National and employed in the Republic of Korea.

Note that FPP isn’t in this list. I don’t think NZ would go back. Modified MMP also isn’t in the list; not that I think it isn’t a credible contender, just that the way the process is structured (referendum: MMP yes/no; if no, referendum on alternate systems) doesn’t seem likely to permit it. There are lots of other peripheral options, such as open list; run-off or instant run-off; or any number of other possibilities. Feel free to argue your corner.

But what sort of system do people actually want? As I see it, within a centralised democratic structure such as we have, relevant factors include the following:

  • Transparency. Results in transparent electoral systems are clear and obvious; how a particular candidate, party or government was elected is reasonably self-evident. FPP is very transparent. STV is very opaque.
  • Simplicity. Simple systems are easy for people whose political engagement stretches to ticking a box or two every three years to understand. Again; FPP is very simple, STV is not at all.
  • Proportionality. Proportional systems elect candidates from parties according to the party’s share of the vote. FPP is not proportional at all. STV is often claimed to be proportional, but it’s really fauxportional, often producing results which seem proportional but were arrived at by non-proportional means. Open list is (in principle) perfectly proportional. Thresholds in proportional systems and the number of electorates in mixed systems are also relevant to this question.
  • Representativeness. Similar but orthogonal to proportionality, a representative system contains mechanisms to guarantee certain segments of the electorate representation. This is a complex notion; geographical electorates are such a representative measure, ensuring that people from the geographical margins are represented, when a non-geographically-determined system (such as purely proportional open list) might marginalise them. Reserve seats for tangata whenua or other groups are another such form of representativeness.
  • Low wastage/regret. Conventional wisdom is that the prospect of a wasted vote depresses turnout (or changes behaviour) among voters who believe their vote might be wasted, which is a self-perpetuating cycle. This is most evident in FPP, but is also present in proportional systems to an extent, due to the effects of a threshold.
  • Decisiveness. Decisive systems produce strong, stable executive governments with few constraints on their power. FPP, except in the rare case of a hung parliament being elected, is decisive, while proportional systems which elect a number of parties and rely on coalitions are less decisive.
  • Small size. Self-explanatory. Any system can be made large or small, but this frequently has huge impacts on other factors.
  • Durability. Durable systems are not prone to future governments tinkering with, amending or replacing them. FPP was extremely durable. MMP has proven fairly durable. This is a meta-factor, in a sense; it seems like anyone valuing this factor highly should lobby for one of the less-extreme systems; a second-best choice, rather than a perfectly proportional system or a highly decisive system, since ‘pretty good’ is less likely to be overturned.

In principle, the relative importance a person assigns to of each of these factors should point to that person’s ideal electoral system. Could be programmed into a handy poll in the leadup to the referendum; in fact, I bet it already has been, I just haven’t found it.

There are other relevant electoral changes, as well. Here are a few; please add your own:

  • Size of parliament and division of seats. Yeah, I listed it above – what I’m referring to here is the electorate-list split in mixed systems; the North/South island and rural/urban splits, that sort of thing. Also the vexed question: how many MPs overall?
  • Allocation of seats. Historically, the One True Way in NZ was for seats to be allocated along population-geographic lines. Nowadays it’s a mix of population-geographic and party allegiance. But what other means of allocating seats are there? What would happen if seats were allocated according to social class? Income? Level of education? Ethnicity? Religion? The history of democracy contains precedent for all these things in one way or another.
  • Decentralisation. Federation of micro-states? Balance of central and local government power? How does one dismantle centralised democracy using democratic mechanisms?
  • Electoral term and other constitutional institutions. Our three-year term is quite short, and there are few checks on the executive ability of governments – as long as they have a parliamentary majority, there’s little they can’t (and won’t) do. Do we need a second chamber? A longer term? Should one go along with the other?
  • Referenda and non-electoral plebiscites. What should their status be? Other representative mechanisms, such as citizens’ juries?
  • The big one. What difference would becoming a republic make anyhow? A better question: if people knew that NZ would become a republic in the near future, how might their electoral preferences change?

Please, answer the question. What do you actually want in an electoral system, and why? And more than that — what do you want, and what do you think is (even remotely) plausible?

L

Update: Scott Yorke has a few choice words on the topic, as well.

Blog Link: The Giant’s Rival Part Two: The US responds.

datePosted on 12:21, September 21st, 2009 by Pablo

The second part of the series on China’s growing presence in the South Pacific is now on Scoop. It explores the US response.

Wrong objection

datePosted on 17:05, September 18th, 2009 by Lew

David Farrar falsely equivocates when he asks the following:

Why do so many people who complain that ACT got five seats in Parliament on only 3.65% of the vote, never complain that the Maori Party got five seats in Parliament on 2.39% of the vote?

The issue isn’t so much that ACT didn’t deserve seats for their share as that, for proportional consistency’s sake, NZ First deserved seats for their share as well. From there, people work backward to ‘If NZF didn’t get them, why should ACT have gotten them?’

The overhang is a misdirection away from the fact that the 5% threshold is the main source of entropy in our proportional system (and its neighbour SM). The two types of electedness he suggests are the same — winning an electorate and coming in on the list — aren’t, as David well knows, and this is a capricious argument from him. To prevent an electorate member from sitting on proportional grounds directly disenfranchises the electorate who voted for her. The solution to a system which arbitrarily disenfranchises a large number of voters on the basis of other voters’ decisions surely isn’t more disenfranchisement — it’s less.

As I’ve argued before, removing or lowering the threshold would reduce voter regret among the supporters of marginal parties, and embolden those electors to vote for their chosen party, resulting in truer representation. The possible impact on an overhang party — one which has traditionally won more seats than its share of the vote would otherwise entitle it — is an interesting case, and would force people who now vote tactically to re-evaluate their decisions.

I have an upcoming post asking what factors people value in an electoral system, and issues like these are germane to the forthcoming discussion about MMP.

L

Jimmy Carter is Right.

datePosted on 23:42, September 17th, 2009 by Pablo

A furore has erupted in the US because former president Jimmy Carter has publicly stated the obvious: many of the people in opposition to health care reform, as well as the so-called astroturf “tea party” and “birther” movements (the latter claiming that Barak Obama is not a natural born US citizen and thus constitutionally ineligible to be president), are less in opposition to Obama’s policies than they are to the color of his skin. Even though he is half-white, they are fixated on his blackness, and in posters, cartoons, internet videos and photomontages he is depicted as an ape, and Arab, a terrorist, a commie or a socialist, and–as Sarah Palin so eloquently expressed it–“not one of us.” The “us” in question is presumably white and conservative, but what they really are is racist.  As Carter said, some people cannot abide by the thought that a Negro is running the show.

Normally one could ignore the crackers and their banjo-strumming Deliverance views. They are, after all, evidence of the death throes of white majority America, which in 25 years will see a non-white (mostly Hispanic) majority and more people of color in positions of national authority. But in this instance these retrograde views are instigated and supported by a disloyal elite who share their perspective, and who have significant clout in politics and the US media. Forget the mental midget that is Joe Wilson, Republican representative from South Carolina and apologist for the Confederacy, who last week shouted “you lie!” in the middle of the president’s speech on health reform to a joint session of Congress. The New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd was correct in noting that the only thing missing from his outburst was the qualifier “boy” at the end.  No president before Obama was interrupted in such a fashion during a major address, to include George W. Bush when he bald-faced lied to Congress and the US public that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and was imminently disposed to use them (thereby setting into motion a chain of events that cost thousands of lives and trillions of squandered dollars in pursuit of what ultimately will wind up looking a lot like the Baath Party regime with a Shiia twist–if Iraq is so lucky). I will not even mention W’s defense of coercive interrogations during his last State of the Union address, but the point is that people who knew better still sat on their hands and shut their mouths. It may have been cowardly, but it was also a measure of Congressional protocol dating back 200 years.

So why the breach in this instance, over a remark that even if debatable was relatively innocuous? What is the single difference between Obama and all his predecessors that would embolden a small-town politician to openly question his integrity before Congress and the country at large (BTW–one of the things that is expressly prohibited under the rules of order in Congressional debates is calling people “liars.”) Why have so many right wing media types jumped to Rep. Wilson’s defense and why are people now sending him campaign contributions from all over the US?

Rep. Wilson is of no consequence and there is little danger in his simple breach of Congressional protocol (a Kanye moment of the political sort, if you will). The real danger is in the subtext of racial animus propagated by the likes of Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, the Christian nutters such as the Phoenix-based Baptist minister who exhorts his congregation to pray for Obama’s assassination, and the other corporate and religious bigots who run the astroturf campaigns against the President’s agenda (“astroturf” refers to the fact that these supposedly grassroots movements are artificially created by  well-funded special interest lobbies using targeted advertising rather than originating from genuine popular discontent). It is these heavily bankrolled conspirators–and they are exactly that–who are the danger. That danger could well turn out to be mortal.

I have written before that the US Right is implicitly setting up a scenario for an attempt on the president’s life. They provide the ideological and rhetorical fuel via their media proxies, and with that stimulus some whacko pulls the trigger or detonates the bomb. It will not be a Muslim fanatic, but a white loser or group of losers holding a racial grudge. The US already has seen evidence of this in the Oklahoma City bombing and repeated white supremacist plots  and attacks (including an assassination plot against Obama during last year’s presidential campaign).  That is why Jimmy Carter needs to be listened to: not all opposition to the President is racist, but a significant portion of the minority that opposes his agenda are playing the man for his color, not the content of his policy. The trouble is that racism is also  the elephant in the room that no one wants to openly confront in this “post racial” era. Until that happens, the descent towards violence is almost inevitable, with implications that are unimaginably bad.

In fact, it can be argued that it will not be a foreign foe that will ultimately defeat the US and reduce it to a fallen empire: it could well be devoured from within, with racism the food for that self-consuming hunger.

A victory for common sense and democracy

datePosted on 11:27, September 17th, 2009 by Lew

… these are the sort of words Michael Laws would be using if the decision to spell Whanganui incorrectly had been endorsed by the NZ Geographic Board, so I feel justified in using similar language given that the decision has gone my way.

As I have argued at great length, this is a good decision. I’ll work through the details of the submissions when I get time, hopefully tonight.

L

12Next