what happens if you take more than 1 viagra in a day is proscar cheaper than propecia we can reduce finasteride taken once in a week where can buy propecia in singapore cost of lasix medication where i can get viagra in vancouver b.c clomid 125 mg getting viagra in south africa cytotec ohne rezept kaufen viagra samples generics viagra online.at vesicare 5 mg bijsluiter nolvadex how can we find viagra in shoppers drug mart viagra online without prescription maestro card cost doxycycline tablets uk prix viagra pharmacie maroc want viagra in kolkata socialist organization in 60s 70s in calif pyralin en ec 500 mg metformin the discovery of viagra dapoxetine india pharmacy no script how much does 25mg viagra cost tadalafil 25 mg kaiser price for cialis menhancer viagra online why did accutane get recalled comprar viagra por internet en chile dias ns1 comprar propecia net is it safe to take viagra when you have gout what is the difference in male and female cialis lasix 40 mg para q sirve achat viagra 100mg does accutane cause birth defects later in life finasteride generico italia 100 mg clomid werkt niet pfizer viagra prices online viagra pfizer tablets que es ciprofloxacina 500 mg y para que sirve viagra price in australia who is the viagra woman in the blue dress purchase azithromycin or doxycycline why increase clomid dosage para que sirve cialis 10 mg buying viagra in lanzarote buy cialis en doha quelle est le prix du viagra en pharmacie prednisone and singulair viagra australian actress robbie cipromed ciprofloxacin 500 mg cipro otic dosage viagra online pens brand names for finasteride how much is viagra in tijuna falcon brand prednisolone eye drops misoprostol cytotec in riyadh consigo comprar viagra na farmacia guadalajara 1 month accutane results in a month cialis generica for you metformin for weight loss safe viagra soft tabs kaufen where to buy 5 mg brand cialis finasteride therapeutic use tadalafil 2.5 mg testimonials buy zithromax locally prednisolone in india viagra 12 mg comprar cialis contrarembolso clomid to get twins is legal to order generic viagra cytotec price in mercury drugstore philippines hiring estimated date for generic viagra how to get viagra in the uk prednisone 10 mg 54 899 pfizer generic zoloft price will one 20 mg cialis lower bp how much for exam pfizer viagra overnight delivery cialis and vwalmart zovirax price compare rayos prednisone reviews for back how soon before should i take viagra viagra tunisie prix how much does cialis cost after insurance ciprodex otic bayer suspension cost good viagra online cost of tadalafil at walmart buy cialis dapoxetine order doxycycline hyc 50mg cap mutual qty 20 costo cialis nelle farmacie comprar propecia en mexico viagra pfrzer ireland can i take ambien with viagra propranolol 40 mg 3 times a day recipes nu doxycycline 100 mg cytotec in italia viagra for sale craigslist how many pills in viagra stock bottle assistance in paying for cialis doxycap doxycycline capsules bp 100mg kann man viagra rezeptfrei in apotheke kaufen extenze or viagra ampicillin 250 mg 5 ml is viagra covered under medicare cheap generic black cialis can you get viagra in boots ciprofloxaxin name in bahasa indonesia buy sublingual cialis authentic brand viagra for sale will propecia keep hair in the front paypal viagra payments generic lunesta myonlinemedsbiz propecia viagra buy viagra calgary counter shelves how long does zoloft stay in the body zithromax online europe pharmacy 250 mg viagra on line viagra online shipped monthly prednisolone 50 mg preisvergleich waschmaschinen clomid como usarlo is viagra legal in peru come comprare viagra o similitude cheapest viagra on the internet metformin 250 mg 1 x day viagra in india stores in dallas how much mg of viagra should i take zoloft generic brands of vicodin buy propecia online without prescription can i buy doxycycline buy lasix overnight patient reviews of accutane vetprofen generic propecia doxycycline discount prices use mastercard bizcochos de soletilla donde comprar viagra will the cost of viagra go down viagra in apotheke metformin 500 mg buy in usa canadian propecia online zovirax in pill form cost cialis 20 mg information prednisone pred 10 corticosteroid nasal spray cialis 100 mg mi 20 mg mi cialis perda de visao swidar 500 25 mg zoloft where can i buy genuine clomid viagra delay spray kaufen price list of of zoloft in philippines where to buy cialis in sa voli low cost per cipro da venezia diclocil 500 mg bivirkninger av prednisolone fertility clinic london clomid twins buying viagra online is it safe canada cialis fast shipping why propranolol is contraindicated in diabetes mellitus how much money does clomid cost success of clomid at 100 mg uk finasteride dr singh generico do viagra onde comprar livro generic propecia review opinion buy ciprofloxacin cream can buy cytotec philippines 10 buy mg nolvadex comprar cytotec brasil how many mg prednisone for poison ivy review zoloft for anxiety viagra tablet name for men in kolkata viagra cialis on usa rx generic viagra cost to produce best face wash use while accutane metformin er dose folgard rx generic viagra is 20mg cialis be split cialis market priligy buy online singapore pharmacy how long is a viagra prescription good for in ny many mg viagra can you take what is propranolol used for in humans erofast sildenafil 50 mg onde comprar how long before cipro kicks in pneumonia accutane roche usa can i get priligy on the nhs viagra websites that accept paypal cost of iui with clomid and hcg what happens when you take half a cialis pil biru viagra usa is filagra really a viagra subsitute counterfeit viagra test kits zithromax 1000 mg uses review sildenafil actavis 100mg can u buy viagra at convenience will i get into to trouble for buying viagra online buy generic dapoxetine virtual viagra review fitoestimulina generico de cialis finasteride reviews bodybuilding is it safe to take doxycycline with food karsivan 100 mg dosierung ciprofloxacin wall green generic viagra bula cialis generico portugal neonatal lasix dosage v herbal viagra alternative canada can i buy cytotec over the counter in the philippines zovirax tab 500 mg is it safe to rake viagra with ampplodine where to buy propecia in philippines will i have to take viagra forever average price of diflucan sildenafil kaufen apotheke generic viagra combo pack donde puedo comprar cytotec en villavicencio finasteride patient reviews sildenafil citrate cost in india is it safe for diabetics to take viagra amoxil use by date comprar cialis sao paulo qu est ce que zithromax how soon should i take cialis propecia cost london kolonada wafers buy online uk viagra prednisone pressure in eyes cialis compare price viagra 100mg yahoo answers lasix is used to treat what prednisone in the treatment of ulcerative colitis cialis 5 mg tadalafilo metformin in colon cancer treatment viagra and cialis in combination generico do viagra 2012 viagra free delivery uk is viagra safe with avalide buy doxycycline online without a script carvedilol generico de cialis 10 mg of prednisone cause water retention where can i get cialis in sydney dipidolor 15 mg bijsluiter cialis metformin hydrochloride 1000 mg weight loss prevention diklofenak t orifarm 50 mg biverkningar av metformin generic cialis professional 40 mg comprar viagra pelo correio where to buy cialis uk how long does viagra stay in a 12 yr olds system free cialis tablets free free trial viagra paypal cialis 20 cut in half how long does it last can a man take more than 100 mg of viagra uses of ciprofloxacin hcl 500 mg generic name zoloft zovirax cold sore cream australia how long does it take for zithromax to work doxycycline mono 100 mg cap lose weight ontario physician specialized in prednisone withdrawel cialis tablets price in pakistan n8 not ovulating on clomid 150mg viagra 50 mg cpr4 bula sildenafil anvisa nerve pain in back from prednisone tadalafil and dapoxetine reviews on washers bagomicina 100 generico do viagra clomid 50 mg dawkowanie tranu is it safe to conceive while man on viagra generic viagra vendors online viagra reviews uk thuoc largactil 25 mg of zoloft can you take zoloft in the morning and at night who has taken accutane lasix medicine uses canada online pharmacy propecia where can buy viagra in belgium over counter viagra and cialis discount generico da pomada zovirax internet pharmacy cialis buy online generic finasteride work for anyone where is the cheapest cialis generic fin vs propecia clomid for men take in morning or at night is celerity stand viagra safe father indian pharmacy viagra locasalen salbe beipackzettel ciprofloxacin ciprofloxacin 750 mg indications for pacemaker what are the ingredents in cialis is there a generic drug for zovirax thuoc acetyl leucine 500 mg metformin zithromax pos 600mg 15 ml mercury amoxil safe in breastfeeding why did the price of diflucan go up viagra taken with l arginine clomid iui costs sildenafil gel over the counter comprare cialis thailandia locked in syndrome viagra retail cost for viagra half life of clomid in men propranolol 60 mg be split in half are mexican viagra safe buy viagra co uk best moisturizers for accutane phenoral 50 mg zoloft can you take clomid if you have pcos viagra 50mg price in egypt finasteride 5 mg for women hair loss studies cialis 20 comprar wirkung viagra nach samenerguss in der how dose the five mg cialis work sildenafil use in pulmonary arterial hypertension what happens if a young male takes viagra cialis overnight online tadalafil 5mg cheapest place to buy it us viagra price metformin 1000 mg daily zithromax 500 mg effet secondaire top 10 viagra like foods high in protein natural equivelant ingredient in sildenafil where to buy cialis in calgary without a prescription can accutane cause eczema can you get viagra in stores propecia in new where can i buy lasix on line without a prescription ritemed metformin 500 mg where i can buy cialis in dubai ovulating on clomid but not getting pregnant why ayurvedic substitute for viagra packungsbeilage cialis 20mg cialis black online mastercard canada correct dosage for doxycycline where can i buy cheap propecia tablets is 40 mg a high dose of prednisone how to get viagra in denver can you split 20mg cialis how many clomid cycles is safe places in melbourne wher cialis is sold ciprofloxacin in prima luna de sarcina tadalafil mechanism of action in bph icd doxycycline safe kids can we get original cialis in thailand socialist party ireland sildenafil sandoz 100 mg tableta viagra generic buy american express ordering viagra pills generico do viagra qual melhor non prescription diflucan 150 mg oral tablet canadian cipla viagra red viagra gialis 200 mg uses online viagra shopping india propecia online dream pharmaceutical viagra from doctor uk achat de cialis online cost of lasix surgery finasteride 5 mg film coated tablets for sale cheapest cialis generic intitle posting and toasting viagra in australia online degree doxycycline whartisthebestin uses safe daily dosage prednisone zithromax liquid refrigerate or not order cialis on line viagra female effects cipro xr 500 mg viagra purchase paypal payments unitidazin 10 mg prednisone key viagra online inderal la and exercise review lasix online tablets c can 40 mg prednisone cause heart problems vibramycin safe during pregnancy clomid working but not getting pregnant patient reviews of viagra canada no prescription cialis ampicillin allergic reactions indian brands tadalafil and depoxitine buy genuine clomid online red dragon viagra user reviews buy viagra chennai zovirax 800 mg price uk rare 100mg zoloft 300 mg wellbutrin for anxiety where can i buy viagra in portugal buy viagra in perth australia time is two year old cialis safe to take aval 320 mg generico do viagra 20 mg prednisone moon face syndrome how long does zoloft stay in your body samples of generic viagra sildenafil 100 mg pharmacokinetics diuretic lasix cost cost of viagra tesco como se usa clomid buying cipro without prescription with mastercard optimax duo 500 mg metformin results of taking 200 mg of viagra buy cialis 10 ml in new jersey ci cipro mg doxycycline mylan 100 mg posologie liquid cialis research chemicals alldaychemist cialis over the counter viagra prise en charge high power viagra tablets in india viagra online super active amoxil suspension 250 mg dosis jewelers cialis 5mg se puede usar con doxyciclene doxycycline price increase reasons prednisone 5 mg ivf due buy viagra reviews glimepiride metformin hydrochloride tablets comprar viagra mercado libre citalopram for anxiety 10 mg prednisone doxycycline effects in pregnancy viagra upset stomach viagra buy singapore condo would zoloft show up in a drug test doxycycline hyclate price in philippines purchase sildenafil pills finasteride online without prescription cialis mit paysafe bezahlen cialis once daily 2 5 mg viagra cost walmart canada long term use of finasteride taking 40 mg cialis artical que es amoxil 500 where to buy cialis c10 pills how much is clomid in canada ubat metformin 500 mg much does one month propecia cost propecia receding hair generika viagra preisvergleich success rates of iui with clomid ucinok viagra generic buy real cialis online canada how to buy tadalafil from india how to purchase viagra with paypal cialis 5 mg werking donts in taking viagra getting a doctor to prescribe viagra online fosforos carlos herrera viagra online high on prednisone doxycycline used to treat heartworms what is thw work of sildenafil tablet 120 mg viagra for sale without press ciprofloxacin 500 mg 100 count bottle rocket cipro 500 mg dis iltihabi prednisone 5 mg moonface blonde actress in acura cialis quantos anos pode usar viagra ricetta prescrizione viagra for sale where to find viagra in vegas genericos if sildenafil 20 cheap zovirax bertibarots lowest price for cialis 20 mg cialis and viagra used together misuse of doxycycline zovirax labiale in allattamento si anglo nubian goat for sale in uk zithromax sildenafil 50 mg works good premature ejaculation mercedes benz c55 amg for sale in uk zithromax viagra in einer apotheke kaufen low dose accutane 40 mg cheap viagra in us does 80 mg modified propranolol help with hot flushes can you buy prednisone in the airport in turkey viagra sildenafil citrate tablets amoxil 400mg tid price over the counter options to viagra purchase viagra in kolkata generic tamoxifen vs nolvadex during cycle accutane shop online chinese herbal viagra ireland efectos secundarios viagra generico viagra cheap toronto natural alternative to propranolol cialis in tucson top viagra store online com how long does 60 mg of propranolol last paying with paypal to order viagra types of viagra in india wiki answer can propecia cause mood swings osteoform 70 mg generico de cialis viagra in galway dapoxetine india sun pharmacy sildenafil axapharm kaufen is there generic for viagra with caremark estrangulamento de la pela tadalafil 20 mg genuxal 50 mg zoloft can propecia cause shedding positive clomid reviews acquisto viagra online realtor online prescription for priligy generique viagra 100mg accutane 40 mg 5 months zithromax 100 mg per teaspoon how much does propecia cost on the nhs online sildenafil uk does prednisone show up in drug tests how much is zithromax in pakistan top level domain generic viagra ciprofloxacin 500 mg from canada nombre generico de viagra uses of ciprofloxacin 500 mg tablets viagra vs cialis dosage chance of twins with clomid 50 mg precio de diflucan 100 mg how did pfizer market viagra viagra tablets name list cost of propranolol 120 mg trapped gas in stomach after taking doxycycline hyclate zithromax 250 mg price in malaysia teva prednisone 5 mg effets secondaires Kiwipolitico » 2009 » May
Archive for ‘May, 2009’

Deconstructing Democracy, Part 2: Consent

datePosted on 15:01, May 29th, 2009 by Pablo

One of the most undervalued concepts in the study of democracy is the notion of consent. Yet it is an absolutely vital aspect of the discourse of civility. “Informed consent” is considered essential for medical treatment; sexual relations should be consensual; parents must sign consent forms releasing schools and sports organisations from liability in the treatment of their children, citizens consent to the decisions of their elected representatives, etc. Even so,  in the study of democracy the notion of consent is conspicuous by its absence. I shall attempt to address it here.

There are two types of political rule: hegemony and domination. Domination is rule where the population acquiesces to superior force and the socio-economic dictates of elites. Hegemony is rule by ideological leadership and consent. Consent is the willing acceptance and subjective incorporation by subordinate groups of elite ideology, political control and socio-economic institutions. Under rule by domination people do not necessarily agree with or accept the legitimacy of the political and economic elite–they just bow before their power. Under hegemonic rule people believe in the legitimacy of the elite ideology and its political institutions and socio-economic form, that is, they actively and willingly accept the elite world view. Consider this parallel in family life: children raised in abusive households do not consent to the authority of their parents, they just acquiesce to their superior strength and physical control. That relationship ends as soon as the child is old and large enough to either leave home or physically confront the abusers. In “hegemonic” households, children consent to the authority of their parents because the believe that parents have their best interests always in mind. Of course, all hegemonic regimes have an element of coercion in them, but it is not the majority basis of rule but rather is used as a disciplinary device against ideological transgressors (which is essentially what all criminal penalties are in democracies). Dominating elites rule primarily rule by coercion; hegemonic elites do not. The good news for those interested in authoritarian regime demise is that rule by force cannot last indefinitely: you cannot coerce or repress the majority in the same measure over extended periods of time without ideological support or increased resistance from the population. Thus it is hegemonic rule that is the most durable.

Although all episodes of domination are dictatorships, properly conceived, and all democracies are ostensibly hegemonic,  hegemony can be achieved by authoritarians in specific instances. The key is to substitute rule by force with ideological leadership designed to secure consent over time. Thus, the Cuban regime in the 1960s and 1970 could be considered hegemonic; so can the country in which I now live. People believe in, support and approve of the authoritarian leadership’s way of doing things and in the majority prefer not to have things change. Conversely, democracies can lose ideological support and the consent of the majority if they fail to deliver on popular expectations or if the leadership begins to rule in its own self-interest–at that point hegemony is lost and domination begins. This was seen in several Latin American countries in the 1990s (think of Peru under Fujimori as the salient case). The key to securing and maintaining mass consent is to meet popular expectations on the political, social and economic levels. That is, consent needs to be simultaneously reproduced on all three dimensions for hegemony to obtain. Although popular support may ebb and wane on any one dimension at a given moment in time, the aggregate must be maintained. Thus, for example, the economic reforms of the 1980s caused severe dislocations in NZ, but it did not fundamentally undermine majority support for democratic institutions or social mores. However, when a crisis on one level deepens and extends into the other two, then the possibility of an “organic crisis of the state” (to use Gramsci’s term) becomes real–that is the revolutionary moment.

The bottom line is this: consent is given willfully, actively and freely. It implies (relative) freedom of choice in doing so on any intersubjective dimension. Acquiescence is unwillingly given, passive and a product of the fear of consequences. It implies limited or no freedom of choice. Majority consent is the basis of long-term rule; majority acquiescence is not. Of course, consent can be manipulated or, as Burowoy argues, manufactured. Parties, unions, firms and other other collective actors frame/channel the hegemonic “debate” in ways that reaffirm rather than challange the status quo. Through such agents elites may construct the terms of the ” debate” in a way that clouds the nature of their relationship with subordinate groups or which diverts attention from the essentials of that relationship and towards incidentals like sports, popular culture, nationalism etc.  That is why subordinate groups need to be autonomous and self-aware in the expression of their collective interests.

The most important aspect of consent, however, is its contingency. Consent is not given once, forever. It is, in reality, contingent on popular expectations being met over time. Think of it this way: most adults in their 40s will not consent to be paid the same salary as they were as teenagers in their first job. They expect more because of their experience, knowledge, discipline etc. Likewise, people living under hegemonic rule demand that their expectations be met at the political, social and economic levels. They want the political leadership to be responsive to their concerns; they want the social order to be peaceful; they want their material needs to be met. Moreover, what constituted the minimum “threshold” of consent in one era will not necessarily suffice to maintain it in the next. In most democracies today, people expect more out of life (and from the state) than they did in 1880 or 1980. Should their expectations not be met,  then the slide towards organic crisis begins….

In democratic capitalism mass contingent consent is two-sided: capitalists consent to a restrained rate of profit and limits on their exploitation via the regulatory and fiscal intervention of a State ruled by majority-elected and responsive political classes (politicians and state managers); subordinate groups consent to the (structural) rule of capital in exchange for incremental increases in their standards of living and freedom of opportunity within the productive apparatus and social division of labour. Together, this dual consent constitutes the democratic class compromise that is, however implicit rather than formalized, at the heart of all democratic capitalist societies.

Thus the “matrix” of consent requires simultaneous reproduction of dual thresholds of consent on all three dimensions leading to a contingent class compromise over time–no mean feat, yet the basis for hegemonic rule in a democratic capitalist society.

There is more to the picture but for the moment this sketch will have to suffice. If I can collect my thoughts further I shall update the post. One thing to bear in mind is that the pursuit and maintenance of mass contingent consent is actually an argument in favour of parliamentary democracy over its presidential alternative, and in favor of MMP over first-past-the-post, two-party systems. The reason is that parliamentary balances under MMP systems are (theoretically at least) more finely attuned to the fluid dynamics and complexities of reproducing a minimum threshold of mass contingent consent in heterogenous societies in which individual and collective expectations often differ (when not counterpoised).

Note: this post has been updated twice since its original publication.

Next post: uncertainty.

Chosŏn Realism

datePosted on 12:37, May 28th, 2009 by Lew

(This and the last are posts I’ve been meaning to put up all week, having been prevented by a migraine and a deadline.)

This week seems an opportune time to link to a small but superb collection of North Korean propaganda posters reproduced (with two brief and fascinating contextual notes) from David Heather and Koen de Ceuster’s book North Korean Posters.

ess_north_korean_39
(“Let’s extensively raise goats in all families!”)

Discussion of the second test in the media has cast a great deal of heat and not very much light on the issues at stake, including one alarming statement in the NZ media by Tim Beal of Victoria University that the USA could defeat the DPRK militarily “without losing a single soldier” (audio), which runs contra to the understanding of the situation I had when I lived there. My understanding, admittedly mostly from pub discussions with officers in the South Korean and US defence establishment, was that the reason there’s a stalemate is a sort of mutually assured destruction, because while the forces in the South clearly have the strategic advantage, the DPRK has an unknown but very large number of well-protected and hidden artillery pieces and conventional rockets in the mountains just north of the border, within easy range of Seoul, and the few dozen hours it might take to destroy them all could result in catastrophic loss of life and infrastructure in that very densely-populated city.

Tough call.

L

Civil disobedience is not an attack

datePosted on 12:10, May 28th, 2009 by Lew

Paul Henry led TV One’s Close Up the other evening with disbelief that GetAcross – “just a few protesters” – could bring Auckland to “a virtual standstill”, and that the police were “powerless to stop them – almost unwilling to stop them”.

Yes, that is amazing.

But he goes on:

But that’s what happened yesterday when protesters broke through barriers and walked across the Harbour Bridge, raising the spectre of just how vulnerable we are to civil disobedience.

Hang on a minute. “Vulnerable” denotes susceptibility to attack, and this construction therefore defines “civil disobedience” as an attack on society, or at least on Auckland. But civil disobedience as a form of activism, an agent of social change or a means of engaging people in the wider political process is by definition not an attack, but one of the `institutions of societal democracy’ referred to in Pablo’s recent post on the topic; a civic duty, to use Thoreau’s formulation, rather than an act of social destructiveness. That the police didn’t – or couldn’t – prevent it by force seems to me a good thing for our society, and I might add a refreshing change from former attitudes toward peaceful protest.

This wasn’t an attack which weakened society, it was an action which could strengthen it by demonstrating that when you want something, there’s no better way to get it than to make your views known. The GetAcross action didn’t result in violence, property damage, serious disorder or anything of the sort – all it did was show up a critical weak link in Auckland’s infrastructure chain. When a couple of thousand – at most – people on bikes can cause tens of thousands of people to become stuck in traffic just by crossing one bridge, once, there are more serious problems than the protest action. If by simply adding a lane two metres wide, ARTA could prevent this from ever having to happen again – then why wouldn’t they? If not, then aren’t they asking for the weak link to be tested, again and again?

L

Update: To my great delight, James at Editing The Herald has skewered Garth George’s latest set of authoritarian mutterings about this topic on the sharp spike of the the black civil rights movement. Party on, James.

Deconstructing Democracy: Introduction.

datePosted on 19:38, May 26th, 2009 by Pablo

Anita’s post below on raising democratic children was meaningful to me because I was primarily raised in authoritarian societies, was involved in anti-authoritarian activities in my youth and first got to vote when I arrived in the US to attend university (under Nixon!). Later as a single parent I worked hard to raise my kids in what I liked to call a “triangular” social democratic family (Dad and two kids with a reasonably equitable sharing of household rights and responsibilities given our respective life positions). Although we do not agree on many issues, I can confidently say that they are both politically engaged.

I spent a large part of the Reagan years living on and off in Latin America studying processes of authoritarian demise and democratic (re)constitution, spent the early 1990s working in and out of the US government, then decided to emigrate to NZ once the kids were old enough to fend for themselves. In NZ I initially found one of the two freest places I have lived in (along with Uruguay), but then unhappily watched the corrosion of democratic values in both political and civil society over the next decade. I am now again involuntarily living under yet another authoritarian regime (not quite as murderous as the ones of my youth), and having written previously about the dilemmas of democratic consolidation in post-authoritarian societies, I have time to reflect from afar on what the term means to me, with specific reference to NZ.  Once I finish the current book project I am working on, I intend to write a book about the subject of democracy in transitional societies, and to that purpose have begun to deconstruct my thought on what democracy involves.

Over the next few blog posts I will sketch out my preliminary thoughts on the issue (these are too long for one post). The reason I do so is not so much as a self-indulgent attempt to see what the thoughts look like on paper, but because I think that sometimes people who have lived their entire lives in a democratic society lose sight of what that really means and what it involves. Perhaps it takes someone who has experience with both dictatorial and democratic systems to cast fresh light on the latter. That is my purpose here.

To begin with, we must separate “democracy” into its procedural and substantive dimensions. Procedural democracy refers to the means (procedures) by which political power is acquired and maintained. Substantive democracy refers to the three dimensions on which democratic societies are reproduced: institutional, societal and economic. I explain each in turn.

Procedural democracy is characterised by free and open competitive elections between self-constituted political actors awarded equal legal status and free from interference from the state, with an unencumbered right to vote shared by the entire adult population of citizens (and in the case of NZ, permanent residents, of which I am one).  This much is the obvious procedural minimum–there is more with regard to how the selection of incumbents of political decision-making positions is accomplished. But the key points are the freedom of expression, preference and competition embedded in the concept of procedural democracy; and the fact that elections, in and of themselves, have no intrinsic worth. By themselves elections are just a procedure, or as a Chilean observer once commented, a type of “secular communion” held at regular intervals by the electorate to consecrate their commitment to the political form as well as to select those who shall temporarily rule.

That is where substantive democracy comes in. Elections without institutional, societal and economic underpinnings are all procedure and no substance. Ferdinand Marcos held (and won) regular elections, as did the PRI regime in Mexico and Brazilian military regime of 1964-1985. The country where I am currently living has regular elections as well, but the outcome is pre-determined: the ruling party always wins. Thus, what matters most for the constitution and consolidation of democracy is not holding elections, but the substantive reproduction of democracy in its institutional, societal and economic dimensions.

Institutional democracy refers to the organization of the state apparatus and collective actors, the rules that bind them, and the forms of interaction they engage. The guiding principle of institutional democracy is transparency, equality and accountability. Institutions, both public and private, big and small, operate in away that minimizes preferential bias or ascriptive intrusions in their governance and outputs. The notions of polyarchy and pluralism apply here. Good representation of the concept is the notion that “justice is blind” or that collective agents and public officials are responsible (effectively answerable) to their principals. Needless to say, even in an advanced liberal democracy like NZ, the reality is somewhat less than the ideal.

That may be due to difficulties at the societal level. Societal democracy refers to the inculcation of notions of consent, concession, compromise, collective interest, equality, solidarity, individual rights, mutual consideration, egalitarianism and legitimate exchange. This promotes general belief in tolerance, respect for difference, non-hierarchical outlooks and negotiated solutions in the pursuit of mutual second-best collective outcomes (as opposed to self-interested first choice maximization of opportunities). It also promotes a (relatively) high degree of public participation in politically-oriented activity (including participation in the type of demonstrations seen in Auckland the past few days). This is what distinguishes democratic from authoritarian societies. Yet here too the ideal is not matched by reality even in the most mature of democracies–but it remains an aspirational objective.

Part of the reason societal democracy is less than perfect is due to failures to achieve economic democracy. At an economic level substantive democracy involves a general agreement within society that favours political guarantees for maintaining a minimum standard of living and just compensation for productive labour. It includes acceptance of minimum health and welfare standards for those who are structurally unemployable (i.e., through no fault of their own). The means of achieving economic democracy are much debated, but the fact of its necessity is not.

There is a fair bit of argument about what dimension should come first. Does procedural-institutional democracy precede societal and economic democracy (as liberal theorists claim), or, as Marxists argue, is the process the reverse? Can it be imposed by external actors, and if so, on which dimensions? (I would argue that in most cases it cannot). The degree to which a society has moved towards achieving procedural and substantive democracy helps distinguish between liberal, illiberal, exclusionary, delegative and radical democratic systems. As an example, let us imagine that we can “score” democratic “value” points based on a continuum from least to most (please note that this is my subjective rating for heuristic purposes and does not use Freedom House or Transparency International scores). Generally speaking, arrayed on a scale of 1-10 (1=undemocratic; 10=democratic utopia), countries are considered democratic if they score above 5 on all dimensions (a minimum of 20 points). Moreover, that score is not static or immutable–it varies over time depending on socio-economic, demographic and political conditions. Thus, when I arrived in NZ in 1997 I scored the country as a 8 on a procedural level, 8 on an institutional level, 9 on a societal level and a 7 on an economic level. By 2007 my scores for NZ were 7.5, 7, 8 and 8 ( a net decline of 1.5 democratic “value” points). In contrast, I had the US scored in 1997 as 6, 6, 8 and 7, moving to 5., 5.5, 7.5 and 6 under the reign of George W. Bush. As for the country I am currently living in, the scores are 1.5, 5, 6.5 and 1.

The point is not to argue for the precision of these scores. The point is that democracy is a living, breathing entity, one that reproduces dialectically across the above-mentioned dimensions, and one that is susceptible to decline if it does not reproduce a minimum threshold of democratic “value” across them. In subsequent posts I shall elaborate on the five factors that need to be reconciled for this to occur. These are consent, uncertainty, contingency, entitlements and self-restraint. In the next post I shall address the issue of consent as the foundation of hegemonic rule, and of  democracies specifically. 

For the moment suffice it to say that I endorse Anita’s insightful remarks about the early political socialisation of children, as that constitutes a precondition for the achievement of societal and institutional democracy.

PS: Please feel free to weigh in. All reasoned views welcome–after all, I have a book project in mind!

Raising democratic children

datePosted on 09:08, May 26th, 2009 by Anita

One of the right’s responses to the Hikoi yesterday has been to complain about the presence of children on the march which disingenuous comments like “Why are there school children there?”. One could criticise these comments for relying on barely hidden stereotypes about Māori, or for gross hypocrisy given the “family values” movements “family friendly” week day marches, but anyhow … what I actually want to talk about is why it is important that children are politically active.

As a child I attended many demonstrations, protests and marches: some at the suggestion of my parents, some off my own bat. I remember, as a 14 year old, asking my parents to write me a note for school so I could attend a rally at parliament in support of the Homosexual Law Reform Bill; I attended in school uniform with no school friends or family members. I also remember being in Parliament the night it was passed  and realising that we had done it – I was a very very small part of that “we”, but  I was a part of that “we”. I grew into a politically engaged young adult, and now adult. I know that one can make a difference, I know that my voice matters and that I can make it heard.

That is an amazing thing to know, and that is at the heart of democracy – knowing that our opinions are respected, and that raising our voices is worthwhile.

I hope that, when Key and Hide back down, every child on that march is told “you did that, together we made that difference”, I hope that when they get old enough to vote they will vote in the seats they created, I hope that when they see something wrong in the future they say “I know I can do something about that”.

Raising democratic children is about way more than school, it is about raising children who know they have power and know how to exercise it.

“Stolen emails”

datePosted on 07:16, May 22nd, 2009 by Anita

It is nearly impossible to steal emails, because to be stealing you have to take something so that the owner no longer has it (not only blindingly obvious but also in the Crimes Act).

So if we go with the common rumour that Brash’s emails were printed out, and imagine someone with legitimate access to them made copies then it’s not theft, in fact I can’t see how it would even be criminal. Another scenario, someone forwards the emails on to someone else, again not theft, and I can’t see how it’s criminal.

The Nats know this, they know it won’t have been theft and is really unlikely to have even been criminal but they keep saying “stolen emails” over and over. They say it because it’s spin – the exact same kind of spin documented in The Hollow Men – they say it because it smears Nicky Hager and it distracts from what the emails show about their behaviour. That makes sense, that’s politics: dirtier than I’d like it to be but no more dirty that we expect from the Nats.

So the question becomes, why do the media keep repeating that National spin?

I don’t see a test case

datePosted on 23:15, May 20th, 2009 by Lew

Much has been said about the poor reporting of the case of James Mason, who was yesterday found guilty of punching his four year-old in the face, but the thing I can’t figure out isn’t the focus on the ear-flick or whatever, but why anyone thinks it is a s59 test case. From having read the Stuff and Herald stories, I gather the following:

  1. To qualify as a s59 test case the verdict would need to hinge on a question of law in the new section of the Crimes Act. Mason would have had to admit striking his son and claim it was either inconsequential or not for the purpose of correction but for the purpose of preventing harm.
  2. Mason denied having struck his son, thus negating the possibility of any defence on either of those grounds.
  3. Mason’s denial was contradicted by two witnesses who testified to seeing him do so.
  4. The jury found that as a matter of fact Mason did strike his son, and duly found him guilty, there having been no argument that it was justified on the grounds of being inconsequential or for the purpose of preventing harm.
  5. Since Mason didn’t appeal to a matter of law, but to a matter of fact, the case couldn’t have been a test case no matter what the verdict was.

It may be because I haven’t read widely today, but the only other person I’ve seen make this argument is RedLogix at The Standard. Are we missing something here?

Aside from which, let me repeat the sentiment that those who want to burn political capital by defending a man who punches a four year-old in the face in public are more than welcome to do so.

L

There are none so blind…

datePosted on 19:35, May 19th, 2009 by Anita

I knew about sow crates[1], I know about poultry farms, plenty of people always have.

  • Quite often when I go into town to do Saturday errands there are people with sow crates, model pigs and petitions.
  • From time to time the TV has clips of sow crated pigs and battery hens
  • Photos of desparate pigs and miserable hens appear in popular culture; movies, docos, magazines, newspapers.
  • The animal rights campaigners and Green Party have run ad after ad and issued press statement after press statement.

It is inconceivable that any politician has not had every chance to find out about sow crates. Any MP who doesn’t know has avoided knowing, any Minister of Agriculture (past or present) who didn’t know has been completely remiss.

[1] I have been vegetarian since my early 20s so I have no reason to pay attention to pig farming practices, I have never been involved in the animal rights movement. I have less reason to know about this than the average NZer.

In which I support Christine Rankin

datePosted on 19:56, May 18th, 2009 by Anita

Before I start, over here I criticise her appointment as a Families Commissioner. I still believe that she is the wrong person at a time when a consensus needs to be built around the fundamentals of family in New Zealand. 

Over the last few days I have become more and more revolted by the media’s intrusion into Christine Rankin’s person life, and the analysis and commentary that has accompanied it. I’ve tried to write this post a couple of times, and I’ve finally unpacked the three issues that I find so offensive.

Stereotyping and dismissing women

75% of the commentary has focussed on Rankin’s sexuality – her skirt length, her earrings, the response of men, her relationships (frame as a seductress) – as if a woman’s only power is her sexuality. She was a senior public servant, she has run a successful lobby organisation; she is clearly an effective political and administrative operator who uses her intellect and eloquence to gain power.

Why oh why is it acceptable to reduce a woman’s power to her sexuality? As if women were no more than breasts and a vulva and all our power comes from our ability to seduce and trap men.

The growing culture of personal attacks

Over the last few years there have been more and more personal attacks masquerading as commentary. Between the reasonable accusations of divisiveness and standing in opposition to government policy, there have been loads of unjustifiable personal attacks on Rankin.

When did it become acceptable for politicians and their allies to use personal attacks? When did the media start running them with glee rather than challenging the ethics and motives of the attacks? When did the Left start to stoop that low?

Unjustifiable intrusion into personal lives disguised as political analysis 

Rankin’s marriages and relationships have absolutely no relevance to her role as a Families Commissioner. It is not the marriage-for-life commission, it’s not the the perfectly-respectable commission, it’s the families commission which is intended to look after New Zealand families in all their shapes and sizes. Rankin’s family is not the same shape as mine, but that is not newsworthy or politically significant.

What justifies the increasingly prurient intrusion into the lives of the famous (and not so famous)? Are we really a country of judgemental curtain twitchers whose only engagement with our communities is condemnatory gossip, rumour and innuendo?

Noticeboard: Events for Wellingtonians

datePosted on 15:10, May 17th, 2009 by Anita

Apologies to the rest of the country :)

Monday 18 May 12noon-1pm Cake stall to support Lane Walker Rudkin workers. Outside Westpac House on Willis St. Turn out to show the government and Westpac that the workers deserve to get their redundancy paid out now (plus for the baking of course :)

Wednesday 20 May 7pm- Wellington Hand Mixer

hand-mixer-wgtn

Saturday 23 May 7pm- Terrorizing Dissent & community solidarity dinner, New Crossways, Roxburgh St. Curries and movies to support NZ and US activists arrested in terror raids.

Hat tip: The Hand Mirror and Indymedia

123Next