is cipro safe for stage 3 kidney disease can you take ambien after viagra prednisone 10 mg and weight gain sildenafil zentiva 100 mg preis is it safe to take advil with ciprofloxacin buy generic cialis online canada pharmacy safe website to buy cialis gi specialists in shreveport la 150 mg viagra reviews q pasa despues de usar cytotec australian customs and viagra costco accutane how to use viagra doctor advice in hindi finasteride 1 mg composicion doxycycline 100 mg how to take novapirina 25 mg of zoloft how long those it take for cialis to go in effect safest way to take accutane cialis nachnahme kaufen slabesti cu metformin buy viagra from lloyds interactions with doxycycline is singapore viagra safe what is a safe dose of cialis cipro basics 500 mg filmtabl viagra spray cost in india prednisone 2.5 mg viagra kaufen ohne rezept schweiz metformin hcl er generic name hydrocortisone ciprofloxacin europe purchase glucophage guercmorteo dove acquistare viagra online sicuro can you get cialis in cabo and take through customs is it ok to take zithromax 500 mg for 6 days daily viagra for cheap comprar cialis confianza buy herbal viagra jellies agua oxigenada 20 volumenes donde comprar viagra diflucan 150 mg 1 dose antibiotic for chlamydia missed dose of propecia free viagra sample cipro eye drops brand name zoloft price chemist warehouse prednisolone 50 mg preisvergleich schweiz kamagra viagra uk cost of viagra nhs que es el amoxil grupo farmacologico metformin 500 mg comprar cialis de forma segura viagra cialis india price will viagra gold 800 my really work anyone take clomid for 6 days brand cialis lowest price about generic cialis doxycycline 100mg uses propranolol 40 mg restless leg syndrome cialis 2.5 mg cheep what is safer cialis or viagra viagra in farmacii pret cost of viagra in tx levofloxacin vs ciprofloxacin kann viagra verkaufen how can i buy viagra from ksa is 150 mg too high a dose of viagra how to test generic viagra clarity xl 500 mg metformin cost doxycycline malaria prevention cheapest place to get clomid onde comprar priligy dapoxetina ciprofloxacin dergboadre cost receita para comprar clomid prednisolone acis 50 mg tabletten dispenser is viagra safe when on methadone is there generic metformin is 20mg accutane strong enough break down viagra price in australia liskantin 250 mg wirkstoff cialis buying prescription cialis clomid reviews uk cialis 5mg stay in system cheapest prices for viagra propecia prix maroc clomid no prescription canada best cum with viagra viagra in celebrities cipro 1000 mg bid dental abscess lisinopril viagra combination buy cialis 40mg online australia what is the generic drug for cipro 300 mg zoloft ocd viagra kanaren kaufen web md generic cialis what can i be allergic to in cialis sildenafil 20 mg uses componenta formatiei generic viagra metformin causing hair loss in men pilule viagra prix auto comprar viagra lisboa what is cipro 500mg furoxona tabletas generico do viagra cialis recreational use effects doxycycline 100mg in the sun remedio levoid 50 mg zoloft viagra 50 mg cost buy nolvadex with paypal online clomid and proviron in male infertility doxycycline for mrsa in lungs bula do tolrest 25 mg zoloft 1 semana de embarazo cytotec online cheap viagra top is 750 mg of cipro bad diflucan safe for breastfeeding semillas de amapolas donde comprar viagra can lasix cause vomiting cheap tadalafil 5mg without a prescription thuoc adalat la 60 mg prednisone real life experience with clomid ovulation viagra femenino en farmacias como comprar viagra en farmacia sin receta priligy dapoxetina generico brasil buy online p viagra viagracheap onesite com doxycycline antibiotic acne reviews non prescription viagra alternatives over the counter propecia for sale paypal viagra 100mg price in bangalore brand pills viagra viagra paypal paymend what does female viagra do to a woman 100 mg clomid and ovulation cialis with no prescription canada pil cytotec online pharmacy where to buy generic cialis overnight cuantas veces se puede usar la pastilla cytotec best time to take metformin once a day viagra tabletonline effets secondaires du cialis 20mg asda generic viagra generic doxycycline shortage cialis price at target pharmacy generic viagra capsules and india where can u buy clomid in the uk treatment for doxycycline resistant chlamydia lasix dosage pulmonary edema buy bags online india cheap viagra cialis how much manila price dapoxetine 30 mg and sildenafil 50mg tablets sale canadian cialis pharmacy online importing cialis to european union mode action viagra for sale cialis 10 mg tablete cjene 50mg viagra sales ascites esenciales puros donde comprar viagra viagra suppliers in montreal dosaggio viagra 25 mg zoloft online australia vigorex sildenafil 50 mg viagra airport uk sildenafil 20 mg for ed how much per pill viagra einzeln online bestellen lacticare lotion generic viagra viagra generico en mexico precio de gasolina buy viagra from canada without perscription viagra in men walmaer cost of cialis generic doxycycline 50mg furosemide lasix dosage sulfacet prednisolone oph sol 5 ml is viagra covered by medicare australia 3 400 a8 25 mg of zoloft viagra pfizer uk sites propecia costs expensive can you take viagra 3 days in a row ciprofloxacin hcl 100 mg capsule viagra tongue pills finasteride price paypal do clomid really work made in sud gomorroidi prednisone cialis 30 mg paypal kilo sports clomid reviews cost of cialis 5 mg. at walgreens welches ist das beste viagra generic substitute for ciprodex otic suspension generic cialis ervaringen travelbird is viagra legal cialis in store in uk viagra spray dooz 99000 online edmonton supplier uk propecia diflucan jack newman medication dose for diflucan liquid accutane cost in mexico mono amoxil rash metformin and prometrium lowest price viagra 100mg diflucan capsule 150mg price in peso cialis tablets tadalafil pramil viagra online sildenafil price uk stamps zovirax 200 mg tabletas digitalizadoras how often do you take doxycycline 100mg cialis daily use cost medicare coverage does doxycycline cause facial flushing target pharmacy prices cialis 20 mg ms magazine founded buy cialis online feedback of mankind sildenafil 100 in india same day delivery cialis hong kong hotel propranolol in capillary hemangiomas study island why is ampicillin used in growth medium for shoot genuine cialis purchase ampicillin dosage for gbs best cost for accutane 30 mg where to buy viagra in singapore airport take finasteride safely metformin hcl 500 mg tablet zydot how do i get generic cialis ship into canada can you get female viagra maximum dose amoxil how much does a month supply of cialis 5mg cost clomid increase to 100 mg 60 mg prednisolone asthma boots private prescriptions for viagra viagra online order safe cipro hereisthebestin without prescription tadalafil made in india is it good or bad doxycycline hyclate 100 mg sunlight vibramycin 100 mg indications of pregnancy daily cialis buy nolvadex online apotheke 14 dns genericos do viagra ciprofloxacin hcl 500 mg tab and fatigue where do i get viagra uk vibramycin 100 mg dispersible tablets meaning generic cialis berlin name of socialist countries in world where to buy accutane in singapore precio de sildenafil generico norwood 6 propecia generic buy cialis pills ukiah misoprostol cytotec como se usa socialist vision on market prices erofast sildenafil 50 mg onde comprar oleo donde comprar priligy en venezuela if 10 mg cialis did not work nolvadex hereisthebestin overnight epival sprinkle generico de cialis it support specialist jobs in nh cialis sales information where to find viagra pills in columbus campus drive cheap viagra sale in england viagra pay using paypal cuantas pastillas usar de cytotec propecia im internet bestellen how long to get prednisone out of system is ordering accutane online safe india buy viagra finasteride from india reviews prednisone psoriatic arthritis doxycycline in asthma zoloft 25 mg for ocd best cum cialis paracetamolo 1000 prezzo generico do viagra liquid viagra ingredients buy lasix 40 mg diuretics uk beanshell generics for viagra brand name depakote er vs generic viagra can you take l tryptophan with zoloft generic where to buy diflucan pills esomeprazole nombre generico de amoxil para que sirve el metformina 850 mg cialis viagra discount causas de cytotec wieviel mg viagra braucht man priligy generico opinioni isole how old can you be to use viagra ventas de cialis en canada toxic dose of doxycycline costo cytotec ecuador earthquake is sildenafil generic available in u prices cialis costco micro framework generics for viagra viagra online answers half dose of propecia can you dissolve doxycycline in water cialis high price doxycycline capsules 100mg for acne famous indian viagra 20 mg prednisone used how long should i take cialis before viagra discount uk best discount pill viagra viagra viagradrugs net can you take clomid whilst breastfeeding donde comprar cytotec panama prednisone liquid dosage chart clomid steroids price propranolol paranoia mg rk2928 generic cialis generic finasteride vs propecia doxycycline safety in breastfeeding viagra in egitto dapoxetine trial pack diflucan fluconazole cheap cipro for pneumonia mechanism of action of metformin in obesity definition viagra online shipping ulcedine 20 mg cialis cialis generico pago contrareembolso viagra 1 tablet price in pakistan se toma cialis 5 mg clomid canada overnight shipping is 150 mg of viagra safe how to buy viagra over the counter in delhi considered long term prednisone usage bula do cialis 20mg can you donate blood if you take accutane cialis gran canaria kaufen roxysatelier comcheap viagra generic ampicillin name avoid metformin in heart failure zelix 150 mg zoloft round generic cialis blue berry viagra prices quanto tempo posso usar o clomid where can i buy viagra over the counter in nsw does doxycycline make you burn in the sun can you take cialis and warfarin ciprofloxacin 500 mg capsulas price of viagra in tesco prednisolone 50 mg vielen how much is for 50 mg viagra at walgreens cialis canada for sale where can viagra be purchased or a similar order brand viagra online order viagra online no perscrition is viagra safe yahoo propecia cause gynecomastia costo de cytotec en ecuador cuales can i take supplements while on accutane buying cialis at a pharmacy. united states federal government socialist generic for doxycycline monohydrate viagra over the counter portugal prednisone safe baby buy lasix rx com amoxil 500 mg philippine peso cost carbo activatus 125 mg zoloft nombres de viagra generico exjade disp tablet 500 mg metformin cheapest place to buy cialis uk cialis canada illegal buy en iyi viagra hangisi diademas accutane generic does blue cross in virginia cover viagra lipitor 10 mg bijsluiter cialis does viagra cause a stuffy nose can you use lasix to pass a drug test clomid ie online ireland will amoxil treat a bladder infection best canadian online pharmacy for cialis nombre generico y comercial lasix metoprolol retard 50 mg bijsluiter nolvadex generic sildenafil dergboadre what endocrinologists in london use clomid for men zyprexa 10 mg beipackzettel ciprofloxacin can i buy clomid in the uk without prescription comprare priligy originale online procytox 50 mg viagra where to get cialis local stockist of generic viagra panatus forte 50 mg zoloft where to buy generic cialis online selling viagra in brazil over the counter generic viagra how to buy manfaat obat sdf sildenafil 50 mg guantes de vinilo donde comprar viagra is zithromax safe during pregnancy can buy cytotec cialis and viagra mix cheap viagra furthermore wellbutrin ordering online zoloft 50 mg third trimester buy cialis 5mg with paypal doxycycline online yahoo cialis philippines price doxycycline dosage for tooth abscess safe to stop zoloft allowed viagra substitute in qatar periodo despues usar cytotec what is the recommended dosage of clomid prednisolone liquid inactive ingredients in allegra viagra united states source finasteride doc 5 mg propranolol sa 60 mg for anxiety que problemas causa el sildenafil when to use viagra tablets propecia genital shrinkage how many ml of zithromax can be given to a 5 year old generic drugs and viagra legit place to buy cialis cipla finasteride 1 mg viagra maximum safe dosage and how often does generic female viagra work buying cialis online ca dapoxetine india rates usn master training specialist recommendation generic diflucan price metformin 500 mg e tab sunpass how many months should you take clomid cialis online offer prilosec and zoloft safe cialis brand 20mg viagra online is the solution dapoxetine ukmix priligy per nachnahme bestellen metformin in kidney transplant remedio valeriana 50 mg zoloft viagra in anus cialis prices rising 3000 mg sildenafil how much is cialis cost viagra as a recreational drug cialis 30 mg dose minioxidil and finasteride cost how often can one take viagra gel super j33 2 womens reviews on cialis what is cost of metformin buy generic cialis in uk priligy safe buy male and female cialis name of doxycycline in japan what the differ between viagra 50 mg and 100 mg order cytotec online for under 1.00 per pill buying cialis 80 mg powder how to prepare 100 mgml ampicillin and pregnancy how we can use viagra in hindi is viagra from mexico safe glucophage 1000 mg kullanim sekli chlamydia treatment antibiotics doxycycline buy sildenafil dapoxetine uk costco finasteride 1mg generic price nsorderedset generic viagra authentic cialis price no dairy with cipro para que sirve ciprofloxacino tabletas de 250 mg how much potassium for lasix 20 mg viagra samples in canada is it safe to give a dog viagra precio de priligy 30 mg cialis manufactured in china best online source for arimidex and nolvadex comprar cialis line intensol generic cialis efeitos viagra generico para que se usa tadalafil still losing hair with propecia cost can clomid cause fibroids meilleurs prix cialis 20mg is there an over the counter cialis for women can you take doxycycline with fish oil undigested pills in stool metformin for pcos is viagra 150 mg bogus how long will it take to ovulate after clomid cipro dose in humans is zithromax available in the uk zoloft side effect in elderly cialis no prescription no generic can import cialis into australia vendita cialis in francia thuoc lauritz 10 mg prednisone generic ciprofloxacin eye drops generic prednisone canine petco testogel kaufen rezeptfrei viagra cialis 5 mg comprimidos excedrin sinus headache generic viagra we can i buy viagra without a prescription raccomandata disdetta contratto generic a viagra clomid at walmart cost street prices for cialis what does sildenafil citrate tablets work in the body cipro over the counter walgreens generico propecia hair viagra patent expiration uk map ciprofloxacin hexal 500 mg alkoholizm cheap cialis 2 day express how long do you take ampicillin socialism in american government zoloft at 150 mgs price on generic cialis canadian no prescription prednisone zovirax creme bestandteile clomid causa dor buying deal pill viagra viagradrugs net ganaric cialis 5 mg price buy cheap clomid pills length of doxycycline treatment can am spiders for sale in uk zithromax denver viagra cost per pill viagra lloyds chemist whalley doxycycline hyclate cause yeast infection metformin axcount 1000 mg beipackzettel doxycycline for chlamydia dose viagra compra online cost of purchasing genuine viagra Kiwipolitico » 2009 » April
Archive for ‘April, 2009’

Protesting too much

datePosted on 23:09, April 28th, 2009 by Lew

I don’t mean to post on Kiwiblog so frequently, but oh well – there’s a lot to post on.

Annette King (or the minions who write her press releases) appear to have jumped the shark, intimating that a Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy is behind David Farrar’s release of two of David Shearer’s old papers advocating the use of mercenaries. Ok, we know that this sort of thing happens – that some right-wing blogs are used to fly kites for politicians or parties who can’t afford to fly them themselves, and undoubtedly the same happens on the other side. But honestly, DPF does background research like this consistently and well, there’s no secret there, and when you allege this sort of thing in relation to a discrete event then you can expect to get taken to the cleaners if you don’t have the necessary documentary evidence. And, frankly, the real story here is the contents of the papers, not the circumstances of their discovery. So King looks like a weeny whinger unless she can put up, and perhaps even then.

On the other hand, it’s a bit rich for DPF to take such exception to the fine distinction between the parliamentary National party and its wider community apparatus. DPF and the KBR are highly important to National’s political strategy, and the lines between traditional media and citizen media, between internal (orthodox) and external (unorthodox) channels of political advice and communication are getting more blurred by the day. King’s press release makes the mistake of being too specific and trying to pin the issue on the official National apparatus, rather than simply being vague about it and probably having the same effect. Because ultimately, it’s no different whether National’s proxies David Farrar and Cameron Slater do the work or whether someone on the inside does it.

L

Just do it! The Auckland referendum

datePosted on 18:50, April 27th, 2009 by Anita

If a political party, or combination of political parties, truly wanted a referendum they could just run one. It wouldn’t be governed by any legislation, but who cares? It would be just as powerful as a CIR (which relies on expressing public opinion and is not binding).

Political parties have access to electoral rolls, parliamentary service funding for material and postage, and free mail for people returning material to parliamentary addresses.

The parties would probably want  to find some eminent people for a panel to oversee the decision on the question and the rules under which the referendum will be run. They’d also benefit from maximum transparency: invite in all the media who want to be there, ensure all meetings are open, all agendas and minutes are public, and so on.

Figuring out the question’s gonna be tough; that’s the key to a referendum and worth putting time and effort into consultation and getting it right.

But, seriously, just do it!

It doesn’t matter that National and Act don’t want one, run it anyway!

It doesn’t matter that National and Act will say it’s not binding, would they ignore the outcome?

Just do it!

Cry havoc

datePosted on 18:38, April 27th, 2009 by Lew

DPF is up to his old tricks again – this one about Hone Harawira is content-free and David’s own comments are typically innocuous, but it functions very well indeed as a bone for the slavering mastiffs of the KBR to gnaw upon, making him look like a sensible moderate, if you squint a bit. For once, this one wasn’t tagged `Fun Things’.

All the necessary ingredients are there – race, privilege, power differential, obscenity and homophobia – because all minorities are equivalent, right?

Aspiring demagogues, take note.

L

Press complaint: exploitation of mental illness

datePosted on 12:13, April 26th, 2009 by Anita

This is my first try at a press complaint, so I’d appreciate suggestions and feedback before it goes in the mail next week. As you can see I’m struggling to address only the issue of coverage of the actions of the mentally ill.

The process is that I have to complain to the editors first, so this will go to all three sunday papers.


Dear <title>.

Complaint: exploitation of mentally ill individual

On Sunday 19 April 2009 <paper> ran a story about the actions of an mentally ill man titled <title>. This story included personal details including details of a suicide attempt and communication with the media when his thinking was clearly disordered and altered by his mental illness. I believe the publication of this article was unethical, is inconsistent with the principles of the New Zealand Press Council, and sets an unacceptable precedent for media coverage of the actions of the mentally ill. It is also damaging for other mentally ill New Zealanders by diminishing the privacy which they can expect to be provided.

The principles of the New Zealand Press Council not only identify privacy as a core principle, but also touch on issues such as individuals suffering from trauma or grief and children and young people. They provide clear guidance that vulnerable people must be protected from unnecessary scrutiny and from exploitation by the media.

While, in this particular case, the mentally ill individual has clearly voluntarily previously engaged with the media over his personal life, no reasonable person could be sure he was capable of genuine consent given the state of his mental health described in the article. The article, therefore, significantly breached his privacy. It may be possible to argue that this case was exceptional, but the underpinning principles of privacy and fairness are not exclusive to people who have no previous media engagement.  People in New Zealand have a right to have their privacy protected, particularly when they are vulnerable or suffering from disordered or delusional thinking which prevents them from actively protecting their own privacy.

Stories like this have two important negative impacts on mentally ill people in New Zealand. Firstly they set a precedent that the media may freely publish information either about the disordered actions of mentally ill individuals, or information they may disclose while disordered or delusional. Secondly they create a culture in which the expectation of privacy of the mentally ill is diminished and increases expectation that the stories of mental illness should be made public for the titillation and curiosity of acquaintances, strangers and colleagues.

I am requesting three remedies to balance the damage done by the article:

  1. An acknowledgement that the publication of the article was inappropriate.
  2. The dissemination of clear guidelines for staff addressing the requirement to respect the privacy of the mentally ill (and other vulnerable groups which may feel some obligation to disclose private information). Training for some staff may be appropriate.
  3. The publication of an in depth article on mental illness in New Zealand focussing on the issues of privacy and the impact of disclosure and the attitudes of acquaintances.

If you or your staff would like to get in touch to discuss…

Yours…

Mt Albert and Russel Norman

datePosted on 11:04, April 25th, 2009 by Anita

What’s with that? I mean, really, what’s with that?

Norman can’t possibly hope to win Mt Albert, this bears no resemblence to either Ōhariu or Epsom and there is no obvious electoral advantage to Mt Albert voters in voting for Norman. The only possible outcome of Norman upping the Green electorate vote in Mt Albert is converting a historically strong left wing seat to an apparently right wing one, and Lee may have the skill to keep it soft blue from there on out.

So the Greens appear, to my outsider’s eye, to trying something which has a possible down side but no possible up side. At the same time Norman’s dragging the Greens away from their reputation for principled electoral politics into the arena of carpetbagging disingenuous political gamesmanship.

No chance of an overt win, significant possible cost, and treating voters like chess pieces – is Russel Norman the Greens’ Murray McCully?

Bah!

Everyone loves a referendum

datePosted on 01:18, April 25th, 2009 by Lew

… but only when they serve our political purposes.

That’s the message you can draw from the two cases in which referenda have been recently proposed; for s59 and for the future of Auckland. The clearest distinction is between ACT and Labour, with Labour calling for a referendum on the Auckland issue in much the same way that ACT pushed for a referendum on s59; and Rodney Hide declining on a pretext, as Helen Clark was widely criticised for doing.

Now, don’t get me wrong – I’m not trying to equivocate on the two issues. I think the Auckland supercity referendum has merit (though phrasing the question will be tricky) and I think the s59 referendum is a jack-up for pure PR purposes – the point I’m making is about parties’ willingness to resort to plebiscite when it suits them, but not when it doesn’t.

L

On the Torture Memos

datePosted on 20:29, April 23rd, 2009 by Pablo

At long last the paper trail authorizing the use of coercive interrogation techniques, to include tortures such as water boarding ( a simulated drowning technique) has been made public. The bottom line is that it reveals that high level Bush administration officials, to include John Ashcroft (Attorney General at the time), John Yoo (Deputy Attorney General), Alberto Gonzalez (White House counsel, later Attorney General) Dick Cheney (Darth Vadar) and Condoleeza Rice (Nurse Ratched), should be indicted for criminal offenses under both US and international law. What is worse, their authorization of criminal acts–no matter how Mr. Yoo’s convoluted legal arguments may wish to paint them as something less than torture and permissible under doctrines of Executive authority anyway–flew in the face of expert opinion that torture is an unreliable method for extracting reliable intelligence and could, in fact, be counter-productive both legally and practically. There are several layers to the story, so I shall briefly run through them.

The techniques used were derived from the SERE school practices. SERE is a program run by the US military to simulate the conditions of a prisoner of war camp in which US aviators and special forces operators might find themselves. It is modeled on 1950s Chinese prison camps. Under controlled conditions, SERE operators subject US personnel to what they admit are “torture techniques” (such as water boarding) in order to teach the US personnel how to resist coercive interrogations. Thus, the Bush White House and Justice department took techniques that were capable of being overcome by determined prisoner resistance and authorized their use, without fully exploring their history or the controlled circumstances of their SERE application, on suspected jihadis whose idea of glory comes in the form of martyrdom. Not to put too fine a point on it, but that is just arse-backwards.

In fact, once SERE camp administrators heard of the (mis) application in 2002 they wrote memos to the Defence Department protesting against the use of SERE techniques. They explicitly warned about the unreliability of the confessions extracted and the risk of accidental death. These memos were ignored by the Rumsfeld cronies who ran the Pentagon at the time and were apparently never passed onto the White House and Justice Department (or if they were, they were ignored). What is important to note is that the people who pushed for the use of these techniques were Republican ideologues who had no actual experience with interrogations. Most interrogators are US military counter-intelligence personnel, who are fully aware of the legal and practical pitfalls of using torture to extract confessions. These include the unreliability of the information extracted, the uselessness of such information for strategic intelligence purposes, the problems of garnering actionable information from atomized cells in a decentralized guerrilla network like al-Qaeda–in other words, the complete disutility of using SERE-type techniques for anything other than immediate tactical purposes (if that). Since these forms of punishment were being meted out in “black sites”  thousands of miles away from the battlefields of Iraq (Abu Ghraib was more of a test case rather than a systematic application of the Yoo doctrine) and Afghanistan (although the prison at Bahgram Air Force Base outside of Kabul is reported to contain a “black site’), or in Guatanamo, even the tactical intelligence obtained was mostly unactionable. Hence, professional interrogators such as Special Forces counter-intelligence officers did not conduct the interrogations, but instead were replaced by CIA operatives or private contractors. The can of worms that opens almost defies belief.

In a nutshell:  the Bush administration authorized unproven and unreliable torture techniques against the advice of those who were best informed about the use and results of those methods, then replaced seasoned interrogators with civilians and private contractors to do the dirty work. Presumably this was to gain some of distance on any potential legal repercussions down the road. When one looks at the results of the Abu Ghraib case, where two enlisted soldiers served short jail sentences, two field officers were reprimanded and demoted and one flag rank officer demoted and  forced to retire, it easy to see how Bush administration officials believed that they would never be held responsible for anything that happened in the “black sites.”

Bush administration defenders claim that the coercive interrogation program obtained results in the form of preventing terrorist attacks but are unable or unwilling to offer a single instance of such a success. They claim that revealing the torture memos jeopardizes current and future intelligence operations and demoralizes the CIA. The answer to these claims (other than to laugh when Dick Cheney makes them), is to say 1) provide a single shred of evidence that an attack was prevented by the use of waterboarding and other forms of torture; 2) prove that any information obtained that was useful could not have been obtained using other (non-torture) techniques. Let us be clear: getting the names of other cell members, or of liaison contacts, or of the early outlines of a terrorist plot is not “actionable” intelligence that could not have been obtained by other means (say, by good human intelligence in the field). Arresting some of the Guantanamo detainees was enough to disrupt the most grandiose of al-Qaeda plots, so once their role was ascertained and their backwards linkages traced, use of torture was just vengeance, not intelligence-gathering. If the claim is going to be made that the use of terror was efficient, i.e., that it actually prevented an imminent attack, then it needs to be supported with proof. After all, the “informants” are not going anywhere so need not fear retribution and whatever intelligence penetration of terrorist networks has occurred should not be vulnerable to exposure if the truth of the matter is revealed (otherwise it is simply shoddy workmanship on the part of US intelligence and its allies).

The best way to verify such claims is to grant immunity to interrogators and lower-level CIA and military officials who oversaw coercive interrogations in  order to find out not only whether the techniques were as necessary as the Bush defenders say there were, as well as their results. More importantly, the main purpose of the grants of immunity is to determine the chain of command responsible for authorizing the use of torture, and on what grounds. The last point is important because as it stands, the Bush administration will hide under the doctrine of “plausible deniability” where subordinates get blamed for the physical acts but no evidentiary link can be conclusively made to the orders of high level officials. That deception can be countered with a “due obedience” approach whereby legal immunity to lower-ranked officials is exchanged for their testimony on who gave the orders and how did they do so (as well as how they tried to conceal those orders).  That is the key to getting indictments of Bush administration officials. John Yoo and his chief lieutenants, in particular (the former now happily ensconced as a Law Professor at UC Berkeley, of all places, the latter now anxiously realizing that private legal practice does not afford them any cover in the face of a federal indictment), need to be held to account because they apparently took an untoward interest in specific techniques and were the keenest to authorize their use. Getting these toadies to turn under the threat of imprisonment could in turn be the key to finding out what exact roles were played by Cheney, Bush and Rice in opening the Pandora’s box embedded in the torture memos.

Of course, being a cautious and pragmatic person, Barack Obama may pull the plug on any prosecutions in the interest of political security (his own and of the Democratic Party). If so, it will be up to the International Criminal Court to seek the truth of the matter, so that even those who rule a seemingly unassailable superpower realise that they too are not above basic standards of human rights and international justice. I shall not hold my breath waiting for either to happen. What is certain is that, until something dramatically different is revealed to counter what is known so far,  from a moral-ethical as well as an efficiency-practical standpoint, the US use of torture in the fight against terrorism has been a failure more than a success.

Explaining the Opening of Diplomatic Dialogue

datePosted on 00:47, April 22nd, 2009 by Pablo

There has been much blather about Obama kow-towing to Hugo Chavez and Daniel Ortega at the recent Summit of the Americas conference, as well as his overtures to Cuba and Iran. At a minimum, his opponents accuse him of sending the wrong message (apparently it involves “legitimizing” governments that have already been majority elected by their own constituents), and at the worst he is labeled a “socialist” and a “traitor” to the US ideals. The drumbeat of hatred in disloyal opposition is stoked by conservative media outlets, who openly incite the ideologically inclined to physically act upon their irrational fears.

Notwithstanding that type of beat-up, and partisan idiocy aside, there is no reason to be alarmed. US broaching of diplomatic dialogue with various adversaries is a tried and true aspect of conventional diplomacy. Henry Kissinger was a major exponent of the approach, so it is no less useful for US President Obama and Secretary  Clinton to do so. 

As a proven diplomatic tactic, one that the Clinton re-treads who run Obama’s foreign policy apparatus clearly subscribe to, the offer to thaw relations between the US and Cuba, Iran and Venezuela is a “tit-for-tat” strategy designed to gauge the intentions of the opponent. Derived from game theory, it simply states that you open with a cooperative move, then replicate the opponent’s response. If the opponent responds with a cooperative gesture, then continue the iteration. If they opponent responds in an uncooperative fashion, then respond in kind, and only change when the opponent changes the tone of its response. In other words, always replicate the opponent’s move.

As the stronger actor, the US is advantaged by such a strategy, as it puts the other side in a quandary vis a vis domestic constituencies and its own rhetoric (Iran is the current case in point). If there are internal contradictions within the political structure of the opponent, such a strategy is designed to expose them.   For example, the US (under Reagan of all people!) told General Pinochet that they would prefer that he not stand for the presidency of Chile under his rigged constitutional referendum in 1988, and offered several inducements (personal as well as political) for his cooperation. He refused, so the US responded by publicly announcing that, in the interest of US-Chile relations, it would prefer that he did not assume the presidency even if he won.  The conservative coalition that backed him splintered over the offer. He consequently lost the referendum and his hand-picked successor lost the 1989 election that restored democracy to Chile. The point is that Reagan and company wanted a conservative post-authoritarian elected government untainted by the name “Pinochet.” When he showed his megalomaniac tendencies and his support base fractured, Chileans got a left-center, pro-market government instead. Win-win on all counts from a post-Reagan US perspective.

I use the Chilean example only because I am personally familiar with it, but the general point is this: a willingness to talk after periods of estrangement is a diplomatic tit-for-tat opening. It puts the ball in the opponent’s court and gives (US) politicians room to delineate their subsequent moves. Exploiting media opportunities to show “friendliness” is symbolic sop thrown out to soften the opponent’s constituency, and can only be undermined by resistance from one’s own constituency (which is why Fox News and its Republican lapdogs are barking so ferociously about it).  Watching local and international media spinmeisters weave their interpretations (however governments may succeed in controlling interpretations), both sides can measure the external and internal consequences of their respective responses, and carry on accordingly. That gives them a degree of separation from political responsibility in the event of failure.

Closer to home, the question arises: does New Zealand understand the utility of a tit-for-tat strategy when dealing with places like, say, Fiji? If not, MFAT should read the above, and the vast literature that underpins it.

pirate-jail-thumb-230x130-2644-fBackground
The Pirate Bay is a BitTorrent tracker – one of the world’s largest, most popular and best-known. Four of its co-founders were yesterday convicted of “assisting in making copyright content available”, sentenced to 12 months’ jail each and required to pay 30 million Kronor (about NZ$6.3m) between them. The offence was not the same as actually distributing the copyright material – the torrent files hosted on TPB are not themselves subject to copyright, but they enable a user to easily access material which is. For a quick backgrounder, see The Guardian’s FAQ, and for exhaustive coverage, see Threat Level’s archive.

I’m very interested indeed in the roles which intellectual property mechanisms play in the world. This verdict has complex and possibly profound political, social, technological and economic implications. I won’t argue its legal merits, but, despite their claims, I don’t think this case or verdict is in the content owners’ best long-term interests, because it perpetuates a business model which has been proven unfit for its purpose.

pirate-bay-guilty-mass-protests-followSocial and political implications
The social and political implications of this verdict seem likely to result in a sort of Streisand effect where by winning a battle, copyright owners may galvanise opposition to their business model and enforcement practices. This verdict was never going to be the end; as defendant Peter Sunde said it was to decide nothing other than which side would file an appeal. [Video in two parts here and here. The first five minutes or so is in Swedish; the rest is in English.] So as much bad-will as there is against the content owners, there’s plenty more time for it to build.

Online media consumption (sanctioned and otherwise) is largely the domain of the two generations born since the baby boom – quite distinct from those in control of the legal, business and political systems which produce that media and constrain its usage, who are middle-aged and older. There exists a significant disconnect between these generations, and the Pirate Bay verdict seems like it could crystallise that disconnect into an outright generational divide along political and philosophical lines. Those in their thirties and forties have been heavily involved in shaping the internet into the phenomenon it is, nurturing fledgling technologies (including filesharing) to meet their own needs and building cultures and identities around different types of participation. It’s theirs; they created it. The generation now in their teens and twenties have known nothing else, and they are the driving force behind its constant recreation, and are if anything even more strongly engaged. The content industry is currently trying the ‘stick’ approach – trying to dictate terms to two generations who’re used to having things their way and are more than capable of making it so. As those generations displace their pre-internet elders, and as the developing world begins to participate more strongly in traditionally-Western information communities, content owners will find themselves less able to dictate terms, not more so. Those in charge of intellectual property realise this and have been busy over the past few decades establishing and extending copyright, patent and trademark systems, conditional trade treaties, anti-circumvention legislation, privacy infringements under the guise of cyber-terrorism prevention, and other such measures under the auspices of TRIPS, the DMCA, the PATRIOT Act, IPRED and plenty of lawsuits, including this one – all in order to retain their existing, inferior business models rather than be forced to compete on the open market of ideas in order to develop better ones.

pirate-party-membership There are political implications for all of this, as well – the Pirate Party of Sweden, formed to reform copyright law, abolish the patent system and strengthen privacy rights, claims to have gained 3,000 new members in the seven hours following the verdict, giving it a larger membership than four out of seven current parties in the Swedish parliament (and if their online membership graph can be believed, it looks like they were up above 5,000 new members within 12 hours). Candidate Christian Engström said:

“The ruling is our ticket to the European Parliament,” concluded Engström, who expects a populist backlash against the ruling to help his party’s chances of gaining a seat in the EU’s primary legislative body. [source]

Now, single-issue parties have a particularly hard row to hoe (even TPB’s Peter Sunde doesn’t vote for the Pirate Party), and in terms of realpolitik few countries can afford to deviate from the intellectual property line established by TRIPS. Nevertheless there are big philosophical issues at stake here. Politicians ignore those two generations at their peril.

Technological and economic implicationspirate_bay
Technological and economic implications are linked because technology dictates the means by which content may be distributed, and without distribution there is no revenue. The Streisand effect mentioned above will likely manifest initially in the market for media as a short-term (and possibly short-lived) , but its long-term implications are much broader. Many of the content owners’ arguments against groups like TPB rest on the flawed premise that demand for content is static and copyright infringement is zero-sum (that is: every copy downloaded represents one less copy bought). The fall in revenue, they claim, is because of copyright infringement, so reducing copyright infringement will necessarily cause revenue to pick up again. There are two problems here: first, the genie is already out of the bottle, and two generations are now accustomed to consuming media on their own terms. They will not be forced to consume media in only the ways which content owners want them to, and whoever applies the stick in an attempt to make them do so will suffer as a consequence, because the content industries depend upon their consumers for survival, not the other way around. Second, and this is critical: by engaging in an aggressive game of whack-a-mole to safeguard a broken business model, the content industry has hastened the destruction of that business model by ensuring that only the fittest filesharing systems survive. Cory Doctorow makes both points better than I:

If The Pirate Bay shuts down, it’s certain that something else will spring up in its wake, of course — just as The Pirate Bay appeared in the wake of the closure of other, more “moderate” services.
With each successive takedown, the entertainment industry forces these services into architectures that are harder to police and harder to shut down. And with each takedown, the industry creates martyrs who inspire their users into an ideological opposition to the entertainment industry, turning them into people who actively dislike these companies and wish them ill (as opposed to opportunists who supplemented their legal acquisition of copyrighted materials with infringing downloads).
It’s a race to turn a relatively benign symbiote (the original Napster, which offered to pay for its downloads if it could get a license) into vicious, antibiotic resistant bacteria that’s dedicated to their destruction.

Content owners, by enforcing the discipline required to survive in a hostile environment, are granting clandestine distribution systems an enormous advantage: those systems evolve and improve while their own system stagnates. There are a few exceptions: Radiohead and Trent Reznor are at the forefront.

Of much more grave seriousness, however, is the chilling effect this verdict could have on the internet – search engines, ISPs and end users. Roger Wallis, Emeritus Professor of Media at Sweden’s Royal Institute of Technology (and an expert witness for the defence) warned:

This will cause a flood of court cases. Against all the ISPs. Because if these guys assisted in copyright infringements, then the ISPs also did. This will have huge consequences. The entire development of broadband may be stalled.

His point is that TPB’s technology meant their servers never hosted copyright files – those were hosted on its users’ home computers, and TPB simply provides a search engine to find content and a service which tells one user’s computer where to find files hosted on another user’s computer. If that makes one criminally liable, then those who are doing the actual distribution (te end users) and a whole lot of other people and organisations whose computers provide similar assistance including search engines and ISPs, are also criminally liable – and could even be more culpable than TPB were, since those computers actually host and distribute the copyright files themselves. Due to the highly robust, distributed, fault-tolerant nature of modern content-distribution systems made fit by nearly a decade’s worth of fine-tuning, there is simply no way to beat filesharing without targeting end-users and ISPs on a case-by-case basis. Any reluctance to roll out or use broadband internet services will have catastrophic flow-on economic effects, and given that media consumption is a major driver of broadband, content owners are in a catch-22 situation: either they aggressively prosecute ISPs and end-users or they fail to beat filesharing. In the former case, they get to keep their business model, at the cost of making criminals of their consumer base and ensuring that yet more complex, robust and powerful distribution mechanisms are developed – and possibly at the cost of the internet as we know it. In the latter case, they have to develop systems which are fit enough to survive on their own. The longer they delay, the harder it will be.

An upcoming post will look at the battle for hearts and minds which will fundamentally determine the winner in this contest.

L

Speak You’re Branes

datePosted on 16:46, April 17th, 2009 by Lew

I’ve been following Speak You’re Branes for a while, since a mate linked me to it, and it is made of win and awesome. We need a blog like it in NZ.

L

12Next