FSA review: strong panel, broad terms, quick

datePosted on 13:54, March 4th, 2009 by Lew

The government has appointed three very eminent and well-respected persons to the panel which will review the Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004, has granted them broad terms of reference, and has imposed a short deadline of 30 June by which they must report back to the Attorney-General. The press release, FAQ and linked ToR document is here.

This seems very positive. The three appointees – Justice Eddie Durie, Professor Richard Boast and Hana O’Regan – are highly-regarded, and none are enemies of tino rangatiratanga or friends of blanket expropriation. The terms of reference give this panel the authority to cover a wide scope of issues, including the prejudicial nature of the FSA (which scotched due process via the courts), to take new submissions, to hold hui and meetings on the matter, and to reconsider historical submissions to the FSA, and `other public documents’ which must surely include the report of UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Dr Rodolfo Stavenhagen, which the Clark government dismissed with scorn.

I have two reservations: first, the short deadline, and second, the lack of commitment to following through on the recommendations of the panel. The short deadline is both a blessing and a curse – it will mean the issue doesn’t drag on, but this could be at the expense of full consultation. The second issue is more serious – there seems to be no indication that the government is under obligation to act on the recommendations, and that means we must take them on their word. The government response to the panel’s report will be a defining issue in NZ political history.

L

2 Responses to “FSA review: strong panel, broad terms, quick”

  1. gingercrush on March 4th, 2009 at 14:02

    Should be six months. I just don’t see three months as long enough. Six months wouldn’t be lengthy but would allow all issues to be explored properly. On the second point, the media will play a huge role in this. If the media and Maori are able to push for the recommendations to be made then something will have to give. Its also interesting, in what type of pressure the Maori Party will put on National and indeed how much pressure the Maori Party will have from their supporters.

  2. Will de Cleene on March 4th, 2009 at 14:16

    Three months is fine. I’m impressed. That’s the way to do it.

Leave a Reply

Name: (required)
Email: (required) (will not be published)
Website:
Comment: