get viagra in edmonton without a prescription zetron bula 150 mg zoloft doxycycline pediatric dose whats the price for a viagra in jamaica how much does viagra cost in the united states comprar viagra en similares can you make cialis in lab costo del viagra generico in farmacia guadalajara cipro dosage in dialysis donde comprar finasteride en guadalajara is 1000 mg zithromax safe clomid nausea vomiting viagra online same day buy ciprofloxacin canada what does viagra costs order nolvadex whartisthebestin accutane pulse treatment clomid pct uk shop online diflucan in dialysis patients legit generic cialis cold medicine safe with zoloft wo kann ich viagra mit paypal bezahlen can you but viagra over the counter in sydney tachyphylaxis viagra generic mefcontrib open generics for zoloft sildenafil axapharm filmtabl 100 mg 12 stk metformin tablets australia tlenek azotu viagra online metformina 850 mg como tomar how many 5 mg cialis can i take sildenafil 100 erfahrungen viagra en tiempo real is viagra safe for a woman cialis cutting pills ampicillin concentration liquid culture charleston cialis 5 mg prezzo voucher side effect of prednisolone in nephrotic syndrome sildenafil 100mg uk cost best way to make clomid work how long does 5mg of cialis stay in your system medias de compression para correr donde comprar viagra buy cheap generic cialis from india can i buy viagra online in australia legal max dose amoxil donde comprar cytotec bogota colombia cialis 5 mg one time cipro vs generic haloperidol 1 mg bijsluiter cialis can i take benicar and viagra lasix 500 mg tablets buy remedios similares viagra generic lasix therapeutic dose diflucan in third trimester jaundice which one is cheaper cialis or viagra pharmacy online in australia for cialis where to buy viagra without a prescription in vancouver where can i get viagra in ghana ciprofloxacin where to buy in gauteng female viagra for sale in uk zithromax tadalafil trade names in india 3 mg cialis manforce viagra tablets order viagra dubai cialis lilly uk clomid 100mg and ovulation comprar viagra en portugal sin receta buy viagra online cheap novalgin 500 mg beipackzettel ciprofloxacin long safe take metformin prednisone 10 mg 6 day directions for gout robaxin generico de cialis para que serve tadalafil 7 mg doxycycline antibiotics uk viagra generico precio peru tadalafil in extenze cheap viagra glasgow walk in buy viagra glasgow can i buy clomid at walmart socialism definition in politics specialist for recurring u t i in males teclozan 500 mg metformin diademas telefonicas accutane cost wal mart cialis price 5mg oral ciprofloxacin dose dziala jak viagra for sale is it safe to take ambien while on prednisone viagra over the counter and its price does viagra work for women viagra free nhs prescription florida cancer specialists in brandon fl what happens if you take 200 milligrams of viagra clomid 50 mg geen effect side effect of doxycycline hyclate 100mg what will happen if i take 400 mg of zoloft celexa equivalent to 100 mg zoloft siti sicuri dove comprare cialis samsung galaxy s4 generico de cialis diflucan tablet 150 mg usa online viagra online bestellen legal dictionary inderal la for tremors review zovirax cream price uk rare where do i purchase doxycycline medication get viagra today in chicago aspiratore nasale neonato controindicazioni viagra como usar cytotec para un mes de embarazo what does womens cialis have in it celevac 500 mg metformin prednisone online no rx next day buy doxycycline 100mg for std with mastercard can i get pregnant after one cycle of clomid bicyclol 25 mg of zoloft select ob plus dha generic cialis finasteride and rogaine in morning or night cialis 20mg 12 stk cost of ciprofloxacin ear drops without insurance viagra suppliers in berlin cytotec in obstetrics what is the common use of ampicillin in newborns buying cialis from india cialis generika erfahrung half of a 100mg viagra acquisto viagra pagamento in contrassegno assicurazione prednisone burning in chest where to buy liquid clomid australia how lasix works in the body chi ha usato propecia can you take cipro with doxycycline finasteride online uk stores evonik werbung viagra online medsmex clomid reviews clomid 50mg how many tablets in pad any over the counter type pills like viagra asics gt 2150 womens reviews on cialis cialis free tablets can accutane cause hearing loss cialis 20 mg90 pills dumolid 10 mg prednisone dosagens de cialis why do we give lasix in between blood transfusion cialis price dosage recommended best days to take clomid for twins kann ich viagra ohne rezept kaufen what is socialism in america publication date cost cephalex compared to ciprofloxin buy cialis in penang can you buy cialis in indonesia buy viagra for female in india cover taste of prednisone liquid how to buy clomid uk viagra price wallmart can i take 2 viagra pills in one day acne treatment without accutane cost is clomid available in kenya propranolol manufacturer in india is cialis a counter drug cialis once daily nhs uk cialis discounts and coupons cialis in spanje kopen walmart drug prices cialis success rate of clomid in obese women buying viagra at tesco online 160 mg propranolol anxiety performance snafi tadalafil price in egypt usar pilula cytotec zoloft 150 mg a day cialis cheap tablets what strength cialis should i take if i take clomid will i have twins risk of ovarian hyperstimulation with clomid for sale same type requirement makes generic cialis cutting cialis tablets in half dosagem clomid pos ciclo viagra tablet usages farmaco generico equivalente viagra side finasteride name brand viagra online kamagra bertolli asian actress in viagra inelusi cu piatra albastra generic viagra lasix calcium in urine prednisone 10 mg cost doxycycline in chinese language buy cheap generic cialis online nome do luftal generico de cialis buying viagra in rocky point mexico cialis tables 20mgs how much to buy accutane cream uk prednisone and lasix prix du cialis 20 does doxycycline work viagra andorra online induction de lovulation clomid reviews forgot to take clomid pill buy cialis cheap en cuanto dinero sale la pastilla cytotec venezuela how to get viagra over the counter in canada 20mg cialis costco cost doxycycline datasheet medsafe bevorderen innesteling iui and clomid what is the safest site to order cialis from cosopt colirio generico de cialis diflucan 150 mg pills for men buy viagra in johor recomended sites for generic viagra can doxycycline cause dark urine viagra ohne rezept in deutschland kaufen order viagra online cheap where can you buy viagra in bulgaria postoval and clomid for sale cytotec dosage for miscarriage in malaysia doses of cytotec in termination of pregnacy para que sirve el inderal 10 mg best pharmacy to order viagra zoloft avoidant personality disorder buy viagra in warrington singapore over thr counter viagra is it safe to take viagra if you have emphysema cialis soft tabs bestseller propranolol in anxiety treatment cialis generic image is propecia shreading in a month cialis price in pakistan clomid 50mg success rate nolvadex 20mg buy buy 200 mg sildenafil cheap cialis online us cialis 5 mg 28 compresse prezzo italian cialis 100mg kaufen 50 mg clomid late ovulation amoxil 850 mg cytotec availability in pakistan bula sultan 25 mg of zoloft 40 mg prednisone taper for allergic reaction price of cialis in canada 10 mg cialis cheap uk paypal european antidepressant female viagra 9 maand clomid reviews viagra 100mg dawkowanie viagra tablets buy uk generic propecia same buy cipla viagra ireland boots over counter viagra fentanyl patches cost generic sildenafil web hosting india cheap generic viagra 20 cheap generic mg nolvadex order compare 20 mg lexapro to 100mg zoloft cialis diario 5 mg caixa 28 comprimidos revestidos donde comprar viagra en andorra angiotensin ii inhibitors generic viagra buy cialis no prescription washington can viagra help with premature ejaculation how much clomid should i take after cycle prolopa hbs 100 25 mg of zoloft viagra 50 mg generic cheap rx cialis cialis brand buy online 20mg is it illegal to buy viagra in mexico finasteride biogaran 1 mg 250 mg clomid 1000 metformin prednisone 50 mg cost where can i buy dapoxetine in india ampicillin and gentamicin in nicu sildenafil in philippinnes prednisone side effect in elderly best generic for accutane tylenol with ic ciprofloxacin hcl 500 mg where to buy safe cialis cost of metformin xr how long does 100mg doxycycline stay in your system ciprofloxacino 500 mg para que sirve yahoo duracion cialis 20 mg buy cialis online no prescription canada buy sildenafil fast shipping can you take testosterone and viagra propranolol health canada glottal 500 mg metformin generico do viagra em curitiba zoloft hearing disorders invest in metformin bekomme ich cialis in luxemburg 100mg clomid and ovidrel propranolol in first trimester cialis in salt lake city dapoxetine india manufacturers association diflucan 50 mg capsule finasteride 5 mg partido engravidei com clomid 100mg how hard will 150 mg of sildenafil get you can i use doxycycline 100 mg for a throat infection can i take viagra into the us ho ciproxin 500 mg how much cialis cost at walgreens viagra buy counter asaprol generico de cialis obat metformin xr 750 mg buy cialis online with paypal australia ascorbic acid tablets bp 500 mg metformin does some food counteract viagra dosage for sildenafil citrate para que serve pramil sildenafil 50mg onde comprar viagra natural 203 k loan specialist in pennsylvania best take cipro viagra pill cheap bangkok where to buy cialis novo methacin cap 50 mg viagra apo propranolol 80 mg buy nolvadex xt online xusal tropfen beipackzettel ciprofloxacin where can i buy zentiva sildenafil tablets uk inderal safe drug viagra price in inr sildenafil dosage in bph specialist in urology bonita springs fl cialis 20 mg vs. cialis 40 mg cialis 5 10 20 mg generic viagra legal australia sildenafil 100 mg generico wrestler how much does accutane cost in california vibramycin howdotofound cost viagra generika per lastschrift metformin upset stomach map of reciprocating states gun law sildenafil eciwlcodkedefe for sale is there a danger taking indian cialis ovestin cream generico de cialis fosfomicina nombre generico de amoxil buy nolvadex pay with paypal inderal 40 india cheapest generic viagra on internet cipro 1a pharma 250 mg nebenwirkungen diclofenac cialis prescription drug do you need a prescription for viagra in argentina priligy generico opinioniste training specialist jobs in nj best spf accutane konstantin meladze viagra for sale cialis in patients with chf protocol doxycycline what not to take with it buy brand nolvadex finasteride drug dose sildenafil 50 mg de marfan lasix use in bodybuilding quando si puo usare il viagra when will generic viagra be released diflucan price in ireland buying lasix online in canada tightness in chest after taking prednisone side clomid uk buy online paypal payment diflucan for yeast infection reviews of london generic viagra propecia cialis e20 generics24 ohne wirkung radikale diflucan dream online order pharmaceutical cialis thailand buy lercapress 20 10 mg prednisone janumet sitagliptin metformin hcl buy real viagra pfizer online doxycycline gut flora quando il cialis diventa generico sildenafil ratiopharm 100 mg filmtabletten kaufen auto alternative pills to viagra cipro 500 mg tablet uses cialis online online pharmacy accutane reviews depression buy cialis online us fedex cialis price walmart insurance can i buy metformin in south africa propranolol 60 mg daily 59 mg zoloft weight ciprofloxacin hexal 500 mg biverkningar kortison viagra sale cyprus weaning off 25 mg zoloft clomid 50mg fait il grossir dibondrin liquid beipackzettel ciprofloxacin how to order lasix sildenafil tabletas 50 mg how do i buy cialis shoppers drug mart in brampton t can doxycycline hyclate treat uti and what mg cialis who makes it stores in karachi that sell viagra herbal viagra over the counter uk prezzo cialis generico 10 mg in farmacia doxycycline hcl mg to cure std zoloft and aricept verkningstid viagra for sale zovirax uk buy online cost for viagra condom viagra generic online malaysia spierx finasteride generic glucophage in renal failure brimonidine y timolol generico de cialis splitting a cialis pill in half nolvadex kopen online what is the cost of cialis with insurance at walmart prednisolone 5 mg ulotka viagra shop 24h reviews wirkstoff trevilor retard 75 mg zoloft buy lasix online reviews fue without propecia price can doxycycline cause gerd cialis 10 mg or 5mg glyxambi generic viagra omeprazole sandoz 40 mg bijwerkingen doxycycline cheap cytotec rowcmoadreders boots viagra cost will legal generic viagra available zoloft 50 mg pregnancy quiz buy female viagra online cheap formula de ciproxina 500 mg elani generico de cialis viagra tablets india price buy cytotec in philippines off brand viagra sildenafil generika legal can you buy viagra over counter in canada viagra what happens when you take it onlineshop cialis comprar com can u buy zithromax at walgreens over the counter can i buy metformin over the counter in australia lyme disease in pugs doxycycline syrup dosage is viagra available in boots costo de una pastilla cytotec klebsiella pneumoniae ampicillin resistance prednisone steroid sale buy viagra online with out a prescription cipro taste in mouth long term use of cialis 5 mg daily tablets do you need a prescription to buy doxycycline metamizol 500 mg dosierung ciprofloxacin diflucan products market in india opryszczka leczenie zovirax generic buy clomid dubai should you take zoloft in the morning or at night para que se usa el prednisone 10mg doxycycline to treat arthritis cialis dosage cost viagra pfizer use clomid bertibarots price achat viagra en ligne paypal what happens if a girl takes a viagra tablet viagra generic 100mg india sulfa in cipro prednisolone nycomed 25 mg tabletten mastiff metformin xr 750 mg twice a day reviews prednisone 20 mg for shingles onde comprar pramil viagra no rio de janeiro clomid after birth control pills cost for prescription viagra zoloft in urine drug test ampicillin in nicu dosing cialis adderall in india socialist party platform usa pelvic pain specialist in annapolis md sildenafila x tadalafila propecia prix marseille is prednisone safe for 2 weeks can doxycycline cause rash on face can you buy viagra tesco online by viagra in pakistan is 250 mg of zithromax enough to kill off pneumonia does cialis require a prescription in usa ya han usado cytotec can you use propecia with rogaine best herbal viagra india accutane tablets buy sildenafil actavis 100mg how long stay in system farmacie online italiane cialis cialis 10mg bestellen cialis 20 mg etkilimi buy prednisone in canada no prescription ovulating on clomid but not getting pregnant why is cialis safe to take with diovan viagra generico bonifico sildenafil generico retirada de pontos where purchase herbal viagra for women in aberdeen ce sa iau in loc de viagra online pharmacy nz cialis canada viagra prices 100mg us drug stores what is the proper dosage of tadalafil where can i get a cialis or viagra sample in canada metformina 750 mg bula next day del in uk viagra by phone facts regarding cheap viagra pills viagra 100 mg duracion sildenafil citrate made in india donde comprar cytotec misoprostol mexico can accutane cause wrinkles armour thyroid generic version of viagra azitromicina sandoz efg 500 mg metformin aerografo para maquillaje donde comprar viagra best place online buy viagra generic cialis best place buy best way quit propecia cialis canada .99 best time to drink viagra cheap cheap generic generic online online viagra viagra especulo descartable donde comprar viagra comprar pastillas cytotec en chicago order zovirax pills cialis for daily use canadian viagra blue tablet price in india Kiwipolitico » Blog Archive » What is it about the Christian Right?

What is it about the Christian Right?

datePosted on 18:02, February 24th, 2009 by Anita

In my short time blogging I have discovered that posts which mention the Christian Right get some kind of kneejerk reaction: sometimes someone leaps to the defence of the CR despite the lack of attack in the post, sometimes people leap in to attack the lunacy of the CR despite my lack of opening for the attack.

It’s not just blogging either. When I argue for lowering the MMP threshold one of my arguments is that it will allow the CR representation in Parliament, often people’s immediate reaction is that they’re the kind of lunatics the threshold is intended to exclude. When I talk the history of the family values movement in New Zealand with conservative people (which, you’ll have to trust me, I do respectfully and with interest) someone often leaps in to defend the CR and tell me that they’ve been misrepresented and are far more moderate than they have been painted.

What is it about the Christian Right that polarises views and creates an attack-and-defence dynamic so quickly?

I know many at the socially liberal end of the spectrum will say that the CR is prejudiced and tells them what to do. But so do many other political, religious and community groups.

Many in the CR will say that they’re ridiculed for their religious and moral beliefs and they are, to at least some extent, right. Some of their knee jerk defensiveness is a response to that contempt, some is probably out of a sense of moral certainty.

What is it that makes it ok for the socially progressive to sneer at the CR? We would never allow it to be said of GLBTQ communities, or the disabled, or ethnic minorities, or women; why do we allow it to be said about this religious minority?

21 Responses to “What is it about the Christian Right?”

  1. Anna on February 24th, 2009 at 18:23

    For me, it depends on the CR in question. Some people hold their beliefs very earnestly, and have the courage of their convictions – I tend to respect them, even though I find their beliefs unpalatable.

    I’ve met a small number of CRs who simply use their beliefs to be objectionable to other people. They claim that saying hateful things about gays is their free speech right, but when other people express their right to free speech by criticising the CR position, said CRs claim persecution. I am completely unapologetic about thinking that’s crap.

  2. Pascal's bookie on February 24th, 2009 at 20:48

    What is it that makes it ok for the socially progressive to sneer at the CR? We would never allow it to be said of GLBTQ communities, or the disabled, or ethnic minorities, or women; why do we allow it to be said about this religious minority?

    I think it’s quite simple. Those other communities are asking to be allowed to live how they want, and be treated as equal members of a pluralistic society. Parts of the CR are demanding that we live how they want us to, and pluralism can go to hell. There is no equivalence.

    The fact that for example, GLBTQ’s have rights, is taken as an affront and an act of oppression against them. “Christianity under attack” “Forcing it down my throat” and so on. It’s nonsense.

    If CR’s want to not be taken as extremists, then they need to start being a lot more vocal about slapping down the extremists that hold such high positions in their movement. “Bishop” Brian for example, said that the reason we had so many social problems was that we had elected a woman as PM, and God doesn’t like that so post hoc ergo jibba jabba hoc, QED.

    He is far from being a fringe figure in the CR. How hard would it be for these moderate CR’s to point out rather publicly, from the bully pulpit as it were, that the ‘bishop’ had stated as prophesy that he would be in power by now. He is not. I understand that the bible has a few things in it about false prophets bearing large profits. Perhaps some literalists or innerant scripture folk could start talking about that for a while, just as a sign of good faith. As it were.

    But he’s too powerful, or it would be rude, or something.

  3. Anita on February 24th, 2009 at 21:13

    Pascal’s Bookie write,

    I think it’s quite simple. Those other communities are asking to be allowed to live how they want, and be treated as equal members of a pluralistic society. Parts of the CR are demanding that we live how they want us to, and pluralism can go to hell. There is no equivalence.

    You are treating pluralism as if it is an absolute good. Pluralism means better for some people and worse for others – why shouldn’t the people for whom it is worse feel distressed and attacked by the shift in power?

    While it’s easy to argue that pluralism does (should?) treat all rights, and all people, as equal and is therefore “fair”, the reality is that it privileges some rights and some people over others. If we accept that then it is completely reasonable to campaign within a pluralist society for our rights to be privileged over others’.

  4. Pascal's bookie on February 24th, 2009 at 21:32

    You are treating pluralism as if it is an absolute good. Pluralism means better for some people and worse for others – why shouldn’t the people for whom it is worse feel distressed and attacked by the shift in power?

    I’m saying that pluralism is something progressives tend to favour, and that the CR opposes pluralism. Within a pluralist society CR types can refrain from doing whatever they think is immoral to their hearts content.

    No one is actually forcing homosexuality down their throats. Abortion isn’t mandatory. Traditional marriages are not only allowed, but very popular. Christians are completely free to live their life according to their beliefs. What is their problem exactly? It seems to be that other people have the same freedom. In other words, their problem is not ‘within pluralism’, but pluralism itself.

    How about we get specific? Civil unions. What right was being privileged over what other right here?

    (I won’t be able to reply till tomorrow)

  5. BLiP on February 24th, 2009 at 21:36

    Anita said:

    In my short time blogging I have discovered that posts which mention the Christian Right get some kind of kneejerk reaction: sometimes someone leaps to the defence of the CR despite the lack of attack in the post, sometimes people leap in to attack the lunacy of the CR despite my lack of opening for the attack.

    Hehehehe – Mars Attacks, near the end of the movie, Jack Nicolson in the command control centre, on his knees wailing:”why can’t we all just get along”

    You might as well ask why red heads attract such mocking?

    Anyway, aren’t you being just a litle too cute with this one? 24 hours previously you posted a piece about the CR responding as a dog to the mantra “family values”? And now you ask: why are they picked on?

  6. Anita on February 24th, 2009 at 22:10

    Pascal’s Bookie writes,

    No one is actually forcing homosexuality down their throats. Abortion isn’t mandatory. Traditional marriages are not only allowed, but very popular. Christians are completely free to live their life according to their beliefs. What is their problem exactly? It seems to be that other people have the same freedom. In other words, their problem is not ‘within pluralism’, but pluralism itself.

    To risk sounding like Stephen Franks for a moment…

    If we were to make it legal for husbands to beat their wives it would not cause me any direct problems and would not put me at any additional direct risk. Yet I would campaign against the change.

    If we were to make it legal for parents to kill any child under the age of two…

    As a member of society I fee I have a duty to care for the rights and safety of more than just me. If I believed that abortion was wrong I should campaign against it, otherwise I would be standing silently as part of a society that murders.

    If I believed people were harmed by homosexuality (as I happen to believe wives are by being beaten by their husbands) I should campaign to reduce the amount of harm.

    How about we get specific? Civil unions. What right was being privileged over what other right here?

    I once read an argument which was against same sex marriage on equality grounds, it made my eyes bleed and it fell out of my brain again but it was all about special treatment.

    Anyhow, I think one could construct an argument that one of the State’s roles is to signal “good” and “appropriate” and “best” and “healthy” and that we have a right for it to do so accurately and effectively, so if het marriages are “best” then for the state to provide ambiguous signals about the acceptability of other relationships is inconsistent with our right to have the state behave consistently with our best interest.

  7. Anita on February 24th, 2009 at 22:16

    BLiP writes,

    Anyway, aren’t you being just a litle too cute with this one? 24 hours previously you posted a piece about the CR responding as a dog to the mantra “family values”? And now you ask: why are they picked on?

    I wrote a post about how “family values” acts as a bridge between the CR and neoliberal anti-welfarism and people read it as an attack on the CR.

    If I had written a post about how “justice” acts as a bridge between the social, economic and environmental lefts, would people have leapt in to defend the environmentalists from my attack?

    Yes, that was one of the reasons I wrote this post. I’m not sure it’s “cute” though.

  8. Pascal's bookie on February 24th, 2009 at 23:34

    As a member of society I fee I have a duty to care for the rights and safety of more than just me. If I believed that abortion was wrong I should campaign against it, otherwise I would be standing silently as part of a society that murders.

    Quite right. However, when people are considering that argument, they are entitled to ask what else follows from that argument, and whether one consistently follows it. If one does not, then they are quite right to think that the argument is one of convenience. They are also entitled to ask how the law would work. Would it be consistently applied, or would it only affect the poor for example. How would it be policed? And in the background there is the fact that a large number of people genuinely reject the idea that it is murder. Believing that it’s murder isn’t enough, they have to be able to convince others that it is. The fact they haven’t been able to do so doesn’t mean they are being oppressed.

    If I believed people were harmed by homosexuality (as I happen to believe wives are by being beaten by their husbands) I should campaign to reduce the amount of harm.

    Of course. But the latter case is self evident and hardly needs demonstrating, the former not so much. When we already know that a person objects to homosexuality for religious reasons, it makes it even harder for them to make the case.

    Anyhow, I think one could construct an argument that one of the State’s roles is to signal “good” and “appropriate” and “best” and “healthy” and that we have a right for it to do so accurately and effectively, so if het marriages are “best” then for the state to provide ambiguous signals about the acceptability of other relationships is inconsistent with our right to have the state behave consistently with our best interest.

    Sure, but would have to actually establish that het’ marriages are best, including for non het’s wouldn’t you? And you would have to do so in a way that was convincing to people that didn’t already think homosexuality was just evil anyway. Again, they fact that haven’t been able to do so, doesn’t mean they are being oppressed.

    In any case, the asserted right to be protected (from ourselves?) is one that gets subordinated all the time, so it doesn’t sound like a very powerful right. For example, I believe people are harmed by certain types of religious thinking, but that does not drive me to think that it should be illegal, and I would campaign against making it so.

    I’m certainly not suggesting that the CR shouldn’t be allowed to make their case. Of course they can. They are free to say all sorts of things about people, and they do. Those people are free to say things back.

    Yes, some Christians get mocked and have their beliefs ridiculed. But look at what the CR says about liberals and atheists.

    According to them, my family isn’t proper enough because we didn’t get a priest or the state involved and that this is the cause of society’s downfall, my son is ‘illegitimate’, and I will spend eternity burning in hell simply because I honestly do not believe in their God, (no matter how much good I try to do, or evil I refrain from). Some of my friends are murderers, others are unnatural mentally deficient perverts because they love the wrong type of person.

    Fair enough, they can say that, and try and convince me that it’s true. But turn about is fair play. I get to call them idiots.

  9. Anita on February 25th, 2009 at 07:13

    Anita writes,

    If I believed people were harmed by homosexuality (as I happen to believe wives are by being beaten by their husbands) I should campaign to reduce the amount of harm.

    Pascal’s Bookie replies

    Of course. But the latter case is self evident and hardly needs demonstrating, the former not so much. When we already know that a person objects to homosexuality for religious reasons, it makes it even harder for them to make the case.

    For a long time it was “self evident” that husbands should physically discipline their wives, servants and children. For a long time it was “self evidence” that homosexuality was wrong.

    Clearly what is “self evident” is defined by the social norms at the time, and is affected by conscious campaigns. Why shouldn’t the CR campaign for the social norms they believe in?

    Sure, but would have to actually establish that het’ marriages are best, including for non het’s wouldn’t you? And you would have to do so in a way that was convincing to people that didn’t already think homosexuality was just evil anyway. Again, they fact that haven’t been able to do so, doesn’t mean they are being oppressed.

    Yes one would, and some of the CR believe that they have established that.

    Once upon a time some women believed they had evidence that suffrage for women would be best for society as a whole. For some time most people disagreed with them and they were oppressed.

    Believing passionately that what you believe is better than what society in general believes and campaigning for it is what brings about social change.

    Just because I happen to disagree with most of the change the CR thinks is right doesn’t mean I don’t think they should campaign for it, or that I think it’s ok for me to call them idiots.

  10. BeShakey on February 25th, 2009 at 09:13

    What is it that makes it ok for the socially progressive to sneer at the CR? We would never allow it to be said of GLBTQ communities, or the disabled, or ethnic minorities, or women; why do we allow it to be said about this religious minority?

    At the risk of setting off a diatribe from some on the left about how we should never judge other people’s views (and therefore that the Nazis were simply misunderstood), the difference is that the CR are making a range of claims that are factually wrong, and then trying to enforce a set of policies and moral standards based on their false beliefs. GLBTQ don’t generally do that and, I would hope, would be criticised if they did. Certainly groups within the left, such as the Greens, are criticsed when they take a similar stance.

  11. Rich on February 25th, 2009 at 10:38

    GLBTQ communities, or the disabled, or ethnic minorities, or women

    Being a right wing christian is an *ideology*, which none of the groups above are.

    Any set of ideas that people want to hold is subject, in my view, to be disputed and attacked by those that disagree. Ideologies that invoke a deity aren’t privileged over those (like libertarianism or socialism) that don’t.

    Discriminating against people because of their sexuality, gender or race is irrational and wrong. Discriminating against them because they have stupid ideas isn’t.

    (Within limits. Obviously the state and large employers should respect peoples beliefs as far as practical).

  12. BeShakey on February 25th, 2009 at 11:47

    (Within limits. Obviously the state and large employers should respect peoples beliefs as far as practical).

    I think the important thing is to respect people, rather than their beliefs. You might be a really nice person, but I don’t think their is any good reason why I should respect your belief that Hitler was a stand-up fella, simply because you believe it. In your example, the state and large employers can get by by applying two principles – respect for people, and relevance (ie is my flat-earth belief relevant to my job as a check-out clerk, or my entitelment to working for families? For a contrasting case, is it relevant to my job as a climate modeller or oil prospecter?).

  13. George Darroch on February 25th, 2009 at 12:10

    This is something that really pisses me off, actually – the way that Russell Norman attacks the Exclusive Brethren and talks as if they have no right to participate in politics. Apart from distracting from what should be his core message (money in politics), it essentially forms a regular attack on a small christian group.

    Now I’m no fan of the Exclusive Brethren, I find them abhorrent and they have harmed people close to me in real ways, but I’ll defend their right to participate as much as anyone.

  14. George Darroch on February 25th, 2009 at 12:17

    Being a right wing christian is an *ideology*, which none of the groups above are.

    I think you’ll find that all of the groups above participate in ways that are ‘ideological’ (insomuch as they deal with worldviews and ideas that are essentially contested). As is their right.

    I think that perhaps because NZ is seen to have a political sphere which is “beyond ideology”, where most political concepts are not disputed, their presence disrupts the consensus. Certain concepts are allowed to be debated in serious ways, but all others are to be left aside.

  15. Rich on February 25th, 2009 at 12:50

    George, I don’t believe that Russell Norman denies the right of the EB to participate in politics. OTOH, I’m sure he has attacked their unfair participation by using their wealth to spread anonymous propaganda in an election campaign. If they play by the rules (which have of course been ripped up by a National government that *wants* the rich to be able to buy elections) then they have every right to speak, advertise and run or support candidates.

    Being gay, female or from an ethnic minority is an entirely different thing to being a christian (or any other religious/political view) – a state of being, not a belief. Sure, people from these groups will often take a political stance that defends their rights (but often not, see female National party members, for instance).

    Of course, religious people don’t see it that way – they see their beliefs as ordained by a deity and privileged over the beliefs of others. They’re wrong, but are entitled to hold that opinion.

  16. George Darroch on February 26th, 2009 at 00:23

    Of course, religious people don’t see it that way – they see their beliefs as ordained by a deity and privileged over the beliefs of others. They’re wrong, but are entitled to hold that opinion.

    I think you’re missing what I’ve said. Christians in NZ do participate in politics in ways that are no different to ‘women in National’ to use your analogy, and participate (often invisibly) in ways that are seen as unthreatening to the consensus. It is only when they assert their otherness and their challenging ideology that they are rebuffed by the political sphere.

    As someone with a few ideologies that I’d like to see in public, the monoculture of NZ politics and limited range of issues available for debate is immediately obvious. I see open Christian political engagement through the same lens – as I would any other minority or disadvantaged group whose views threaten the consensus position.

  17. BLiP on February 26th, 2009 at 09:20

    George says:

    This is something that really pisses me off, actually – the way that Russell Norman attacks the Exclusive Brethren and talks as if they have no right to participate in politics. Apart from distracting from what should be his core message (money in politics), it essentially forms a regular attack on a small christian group.

    I also disagree. Norman, from what I’ve seen, points out the hypocrisy of the Exclusive Brethren in that it instructed members to NOT be involved in politics – and then, when it did involve itself, it did so in a devilishly devious manner. One wonders what other hypocrisy the Exclusive Brethren practise.

  18. jcuknz on February 26th, 2009 at 20:54

    Christian religion and the zealots it breeds have been the cause of so much strife and suffering in the past two millenium that I wonder than anybody intelligent bothers with it… a shame as I was brought up a christian, took it as a school cert subject, tutored by an aunt with her Bishops Licence to preach in COE churches .. and try to be a christian but really abhor the ‘church’ and its leaders.

    This apprears to be a problem with every religion unless the zealots are strongly suppressed.

  19. George Darroch on February 27th, 2009 at 01:12

    I also disagree. Norman, from what I’ve seen, points out the hypocrisy of the Exclusive Brethren in that it instructed members to NOT be involved in politics – and then, when it did involve itself, it did so in a devilishly devious manner. One wonders what other hypocrisy the Exclusive Brethren practise.

    Which is an attack on them. A deserved one, of course.

    What he’s trying to say is that they were scummy hypocrites who broke their own rules, spent hundreds of thousands in a secret campaign with National, and then lied about it when caught. But it is very easily seen as an attack on them because they chose to get involved in politics and thus an assertion that conservative christians have no right to get involved in politics.

    And the second perception works to a large extent because there is a default position in NZ politics that conservative christians have been marginalised deliberately and shut out, which is true, as is the point of Anita’s post.

  20. Rich on February 27th, 2009 at 08:53

    I don’t see how you can possibly think conservative christians are marginalised.

    They have a huge amount of influence in NZ politics out of proportion to their actual support. Every time the last government proposed progressive legislation, Maxim, Family First, Destiny and the rest were all over the media.

    I’d say that the few decent progressive christians *are* marginalised by the bigoted ones.

  21. Ari on February 27th, 2009 at 13:58

    I’d say that the few decent progressive christians *are* marginalised by the bigoted ones.

    Indeed. When was the last time you saw a newspaper devote more than a sentence to progressive religious values? They’re talked about so little that it could actually be a really good interest story- but it contradicts the newspaper narratives that religion is inherently conservative and complicates news stories, which is a recipe for “paying for our news”, so they don’t do it because they’re struggling financially. (Not to mention there’s like three even marginally progressive editorialists in the entire country, including Chris “Labour forever!” Trotter.) Yum. =/

Leave a Reply

Name: (required)
Email: (required) (will not be published)
Website:
Comment: